Literature DB >> 29020441

Three-Dimensional Printing of Nano Hydroxyapatite/Poly(ester urea) Composite Scaffolds with Enhanced Bioactivity.

Jiayi Yu1, Yanyi Xu1, Shan Li1, Gabrielle V Seifert1, Matthew L Becker1.   

Abstract

Polymer-bioceramic composites incorporate the desirable properties of each material while mitigating the limiting characteristics of each component. 1,6-Hexanediol l-phenylalanine-based poly(ester urea) (PEU) blended with hydroxyapatite (HA) nanocrystals were three-dimensional (3D) printed into porous scaffolds (75% porosity) via fused deposition modeling and seeded with MC3T3-E1 preosteoblast cells in vitro to examine their bioactivity. The resulting 3D printed scaffolds exhibited a compressive modulus of ∼50 MPa after a 1-week incubation in PBS at 37 °C, cell viability >95%, and a composition-dependent enhancement of radio-contrast. The influence of HA on MC3T3-E1 proliferation and differentiation was measured using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction, immunohistochemistry and biochemical assays. After 4 weeks, alkaline phosphatase activity increased significantly for the 30% HA composite with values reaching 2.5-fold greater than the control. Bone sialoprotein showed approximately 880-fold higher expression and 15-fold higher expression of osteocalcin on the 30% HA composite compared to those of the control. Calcium quantification results demonstrated a 185-fold increase of calcium concentration in mineralized extracellular matrix deposition after 4 weeks of cell culture in samples with higher HA content. 3D printed HA-containing PEU composites promote bone regeneration and have the potential to be used in orthopedic applications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29020441     DOI: 10.1021/acs.biomac.7b01222

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomacromolecules        ISSN: 1525-7797            Impact factor:   6.988


  7 in total

1.  Innovations in Craniofacial Bone and Periodontal Tissue Engineering - From Electrospinning to Converged Biofabrication.

Authors:  Zeynep Aytac; Nileshkumar Dubey; Arwa Daghrery; Jessica A Ferreira; Isaac J de Souza Araújo; Miguel Castilho; Jos Malda; Marco C Bottino
Journal:  Int Mater Rev       Date:  2021-07-05       Impact factor: 15.750

Review 2.  Applications of nanotechnology in 3D printed tissue engineering scaffolds.

Authors:  Noah Z Laird; Timothy M Acri; Jaidev L Chakka; Juliana C Quarterman; Walla I Malkawi; Satheesh Elangovan; Aliasger K Salem
Journal:  Eur J Pharm Biopharm       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 5.589

3.  In vivo changes of nanoapatite crystals during bone reconstruction and the differences with native bone apatite.

Authors:  Xiyu Li; Qin Zou; Haifeng Chen; Wei Li
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2019-11-13       Impact factor: 14.136

4.  A Preliminary Evaluation of the Pro-Chondrogenic Potential of 3D-Bioprinted Poly(ester Urea) Scaffolds.

Authors:  Samuel R Moxon; Miguel J S Ferreira; Patricia Dos Santos; Bogdan Popa; Antonio Gloria; Ramaz Katsarava; David Tugushi; Armenio C Serra; Nigel M Hooper; Susan J Kimber; Ana C Fonseca; Marco A N Domingos
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 4.329

5.  Tuning Cell Behavior on 3D Scaffolds Fabricated by Atmospheric Plasma-Assisted Additive Manufacturing.

Authors:  Maria Cámara-Torres; Ravi Sinha; Paolo Scopece; Thomas Neubert; Kristina Lachmann; Alessandro Patelli; Carlos Mota; Lorenzo Moroni
Journal:  ACS Appl Mater Interfaces       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 9.229

6.  Enhanced osteogenic differentiation of stem cells by 3D printed PCL scaffolds coated with collagen and hydroxyapatite.

Authors:  Zahra Ebrahimi; Shiva Irani; Abdolreza Ardeshirylajimi; Ehsan Seyedjafari
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-20       Impact factor: 4.996

Review 7.  Novel Inorganic Nanomaterial-Based Therapy for Bone Tissue Regeneration.

Authors:  Yu Fu; Shengjie Cui; Dan Luo; Yan Liu
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 5.076

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.