Nithya J Gogtay1, Renuka Munshi2, D H Ashwath Narayana3, B J Mahendra4, Vikas Kshirsagar5, Bhagwat Gunale6, Susan Moore7, Peter Cheslock8, Saket Thaker1, Siddharth Deshpande1, Sunil Karande9, Dipti Kumbhar2, H S Ravish3, B R Harish4, Sambhaji S Pisal6, Rajeev Dhere6, Varsha Parulekar10, William C Blackwelder11, Deborah C Molrine8, Prasad S Kulkarni6. 1. Department of Clinical Pharmacology, KEM Hospital and Seth G. S. Medical College, Mumbai, Maharashtra. 2. Department of Clinical Pharmacology, BYL Nair Charitable Hospital and Topiwala National Medical College, Mumbai, Maharashtra. 3. Department of Community Medicine, Kempegowda Institute of Medical Sciences, Bengaluru. 4. Department of Community Medicine, Mandya Institute of Medical Sciences, Karnataka. 5. Department of Preventive and Social Medicine (Community Medicine), B. J. Government Medical College and Sassoon General Hospitals. 6. Serum Institute of India Pvt Ltd, Pune, Maharashtra, India. 7. Rabies Laboratory, Kansas State University, Manhattan. 8. MassBiologics, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Boston. 9. Department of Pediatrics, KEM Hospital and Seth G. S. Medical College. 10. DiagnoSearch Life Sciences Pvt Ltd, Thane, Maharashtra, India. 11. School of Medicine, University of Maryland-Baltimore.
Abstract
Background: Lack of access to rabies immunoglobulin (RIG) contributes to high rabies mortality. A recombinant human monoclonal antibody (SII RMAb) was tested in a postexposure prophylaxis (PEP) regimen in comparison with a human RIG (HRIG)-containing PEP regimen. Methods: This was a phase 2/3, randomized, single-blind, noninferiority study conducted in 200 participants with World Health Organization category III suspected rabies exposures. Participants received either SII RMAb or HRIG (1:1 ratio) in wounds and, if required, intramuscularly on day 0, along with 5 doses of rabies vaccine intramuscualarly on days 0, 3, 7, 14 and 28. The primary endpoint was the ratio of the day 14 geometric mean concentration (GMC) of rabies virus neutralizing activity (RVNA) as measured by rapid fluorescent focus inhibition test for SII RMAb recipients relative to HRIG recipients. Results: One hundred ninety-nine participants received SII RMAb (n = 101) or HRIG (n = 98) and at least 1 dose of vaccine. The day 14 GMC ratio of RVNA for the SII RMAb group relative to the HRIG group was 4.23 (96.9018% confidence interval [CI], 2.59-6.94) with a GMC of of 24.90 IU/mL (95% CI, 18.94-32.74) for SII RMAb recipients and 5.88 IU/mL (95% CI, 4.11-8.41) for HRIG recipients. The majority of local injection site and systemic adverse reactions reported from both groups were mild to moderate in severity. Conclusions: A PEP regimen containing SII RMAb was safe and demonstrated noninferiority to HRIG PEP in RVNA production. The novel monoclonal potentially offers a safe and potent alternative for the passive component of PEP and could significantly improve the management of bites from suspected rabid animals. Clincical Trials Registration: CTRI/2012/05/002709.
RCT Entities:
Background: Lack of access to rabies immunoglobulin (RIG) contributes to high rabies mortality. A recombinant human monoclonal antibody (SII RMAb) was tested in a postexposure prophylaxis (PEP) regimen in comparison with a human RIG (HRIG)-containing PEP regimen. Methods: This was a phase 2/3, randomized, single-blind, noninferiority study conducted in 200 participants with World Health Organization category III suspected rabies exposures. Participants received either SII RMAb or HRIG (1:1 ratio) in wounds and, if required, intramuscularly on day 0, along with 5 doses of rabies vaccine intramuscualarly on days 0, 3, 7, 14 and 28. The primary endpoint was the ratio of the day 14 geometric mean concentration (GMC) of rabies virus neutralizing activity (RVNA) as measured by rapid fluorescent focus inhibition test for SII RMAb recipients relative to HRIG recipients. Results: One hundred ninety-nine participants received SII RMAb (n = 101) or HRIG (n = 98) and at least 1 dose of vaccine. The day 14 GMC ratio of RVNA for the SII RMAb group relative to the HRIG group was 4.23 (96.9018% confidence interval [CI], 2.59-6.94) with a GMC of of 24.90 IU/mL (95% CI, 18.94-32.74) for SII RMAb recipients and 5.88 IU/mL (95% CI, 4.11-8.41) for HRIG recipients. The majority of local injection site and systemic adverse reactions reported from both groups were mild to moderate in severity. Conclusions: A PEP regimen containing SII RMAb was safe and demonstrated noninferiority to HRIG PEP in RVNA production. The novel monoclonal potentially offers a safe and potent alternative for the passive component of PEP and could significantly improve the management of bites from suspected rabid animals. Clincical Trials Registration: CTRI/2012/05/002709.
Authors: Kristian Daniel Ralph Roth; Esther Veronika Wenzel; Maximilian Ruschig; Stephan Steinke; Nora Langreder; Philip Alexander Heine; Kai-Thomas Schneider; Rico Ballmann; Viola Fühner; Philipp Kuhn; Thomas Schirrmann; André Frenzel; Stefan Dübel; Maren Schubert; Gustavo Marçal Schmidt Garcia Moreira; Federico Bertoglio; Giulio Russo; Michael Hust Journal: Front Cell Infect Microbiol Date: 2021-07-07 Impact factor: 5.293
Authors: Jacob D Galson; Sebastian Schaetzle; Rachael J M Bashford-Rogers; Matthew I J Raybould; Aleksandr Kovaltsuk; Gavin J Kilpatrick; Ralph Minter; Donna K Finch; Jorge Dias; Louisa K James; Gavin Thomas; Wing-Yiu Jason Lee; Jason Betley; Olivia Cavlan; Alex Leech; Charlotte M Deane; Joan Seoane; Carlos Caldas; Daniel J Pennington; Paul Pfeffer; Jane Osbourn Journal: Front Immunol Date: 2020-12-15 Impact factor: 7.561
Authors: Philip J M Brouwer; Tom G Caniels; Karlijn van der Straten; Jonne L Snitselaar; Yoann Aldon; Sandhya Bangaru; Jonathan L Torres; Nisreen M A Okba; Mathieu Claireaux; Gius Kerster; Arthur E H Bentlage; Marlies M van Haaren; Denise Guerra; Judith A Burger; Edith E Schermer; Kirsten D Verheul; Niels van der Velde; Alex van der Kooi; Jelle van Schooten; Mariëlle J van Breemen; Tom P L Bijl; Kwinten Sliepen; Aafke Aartse; Ronald Derking; Ilja Bontjer; Neeltje A Kootstra; W Joost Wiersinga; Gestur Vidarsson; Bart L Haagmans; Andrew B Ward; Godelieve J de Bree; Rogier W Sanders; Marit J van Gils Journal: Science Date: 2020-06-15 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Dawn L Weir; Si'Ana A Coggins; Bang K Vu; Jessica Coertse; Lianying Yan; Ina L Smith; Eric D Laing; Wanda Markotter; Christopher C Broder; Brian C Schaefer Journal: Viruses Date: 2021-03-01 Impact factor: 5.048