Literature DB >> 29020222

Antimicrobial Resistance Gene Acquisition and Depletion Following Fecal Microbiota Transplantation for Recurrent Clostridium difficile Infection.

Victor Leung1, Caroline Vincent2, Thaddeus J Edens3, Mark Miller4, Amee R Manges5,6.   

Abstract

Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) may be a novel approach to eliminate multidrug-resistant bacteria from the gut and to prevent future infections. Using whole metagenome sequencing data from 8 FMT donor-recipient pairs, we identified 37 and 95 antimicrobial resistance genes that were acquired by or removed from FMT recipients, respectively.
© The Author(s) 2017. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clostridium difficile infection; antimicrobial resistance; fecal microbiota transplantation; metagenomics; multidrug resistance

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29020222      PMCID: PMC5850035          DOI: 10.1093/cid/cix821

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Infect Dis        ISSN: 1058-4838            Impact factor:   9.079


Globally, the incidence of antimicrobial resistant infections is growing [1]. The cupboard of available and efficacious antimicrobial agents is becoming increasingly bare, few new agents exist in the developmental pipeline, and the time lag to drug accessibility is long. There is an urgent need to consider novel interventions, including nonpharmacologic approaches to preventing colonization and possibly treating infection from multiply drug-resistant bacteria. Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is a nonpharmacologic treatment for recurrent Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) in hospitalized patients with antibiotic-associated diarrhea. FMT involves the infusion of healthy donor feces into the intestinal tract of patients with recurrent CDI via a nasojejunal/nasoduodenal tube or via colonoscope or retention enema. FMT has been shown to be highly effective for treating CDI [2, 3] and has led to the elimination of C. difficile from the intestinal tract of infected patients. Engraftment of the donor’s intestinal microbiota and microbiota recovery in the recipient have been demonstrated [4]. Following treatment of recurrent CDI with FMT, investigators began to notice that other highly drug-resistant bacteria were also disappearing along with C. difficile. Initial case reports indicated that several types of multidrug-resistant opportunistic organisms such as carbapenemase- and extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)–producing Enterobacteriaceae, vancomycin-resistant Enterococci, and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus were being eliminated in patients undergoing FMT for recurrent CDI [5]. Shortly thereafter, case reports began emerging using FMT to directly decolonize non-CDI patients with resistant infections or patients at risk of infection [5, 6]. A recent study showed complete decolonization of various organisms in 15 of 20 (70%) patients [7]. Finally, a study by Millan et al showed that FMT may contribute to the reduction of antimicrobial-resistant genes in FMT recipients [8]. In this study, we sought to replicate these findings and to ask whether FMT recipients could also acquire antimicrobial resistance genes as the result of FMT. We sought to characterize changes to microbiota composition and antimicrobial resistance gene carriage as the result of FMT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients who had multiply recurrent CDI (defined as a primary episode followed by at least 2 recurrences) were eligible and enrolled (Jewish General Hospital protocol number 10–050) following informed consent for both the FMT and the metagenomic analyses. An episode of CDI (primary or recurrence) was defined as the presence of a positive C. difficile toxin assay (enzyme immunoassay or nucleic acid amplification assay) or clinicopathologic symptoms/signs of CDI (typical endoscopic or pathologic changes) and at least 3 diarrheal bowel movements in 24 hours. A CDI recurrence was defined as an episode of CDI within 60 days following the end of treatment for a previous CDI episode. FMT donors were identified from family, household members, or friends of CDI patients, and selected donors were enrolled following informed consent for donor screening procedures, stool donation, and metagenomic analyses. Screening of donor candidates included stool culture for bacterial enteric pathogens; C. difficile cytotoxin assay; ova and parasite enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (Giardia lamblia, Entamoeba histolytica, and Cryptosporidium species); and serology for human immunodeficiency virus, syphilis, hepatitis A virus (hepatitis A immunoglobulin M), hepatitis B virus (hepatitis B surface antigen), hepatitis C virus (hepatitis C total antibody) and human T-lymphotropic virus types 1/2 (antibody). Donors also reported no acute illness, no diarrhea, no functional bowel disorders, no receipt of antibiotics within 1 month, and no immunosuppressive therapy within 3 months of stool donation. FMT was performed by V. L. and M. M. in Montréal, Québec, between 2010 and 2012. In brief, FMT preparation included cessation of the chronic suppressive oral vancomycin 2 days prior to FMT, a clear fluid diet for 24 hours prior to FMT, and a self-administered rectal enema on the morning of the FMT with no additional bowel preparation. The FMT protocol included a rectal enema infusion of 150 g of filtered and homogenized donor stools, blended in 750 mL of nonbacteriostatic normal saline. The stool suspension was delivered via the enema tube with the patient in the lateral decubitus position and was retained for 2 hours with the patient changing position laterally every 30 minutes. The study subject was assessed on days 3, 7, 14, 30, 60, and 90 post-FMT, where stool was collected and C. difficile culture and cytotoxin assay were performed. For this study, treatment failure was defined as onset of a CDI episode ≤60 days post‐FMT if no antibiotics had been taken during the post-FMT period. Treatment success was defined by absence of a CDI episode within ≤60 days post‐FMT if no antibiotics had been taken during the period. We performed whole metagenome DNA sequencing from stool specimens from donors and from recipients prior to FMT, and at the 6 visits following FMT. Total microbial DNA was extracted from 200 mg of stool using the QIAamp DNA stool mini kit. Library preparation was performed using a Cold Spring Harbor Protocol for highly multiplexed sample sequencing [9]. Whole metagenome sequencing was performed on the Illumina 2500 HiSeq platform at the McGill University Genome Québec Innovation Centre. Sequencing read datasets were quality filtered and then annotated using MetaPhlAn [10] for taxonomic composition and the Comprehensive Antimicrobial Resistance Database (CARD) [11] for antimicrobial gene identification. Sequencing reads were normalized and aligned to CARD using Bowtie2; positive genes exhibited >95% homology over 80% of CARD gene length. Log-based changes in relative abundance of microbial taxa in the FMT recipients were investigated. We defined acquisition of an antimicrobial resistance gene by the recipient as a resistance gene present in the donor at the FMT visit, absent in the recipient at or before the FMT visit and then present in the recipient at any subsequent visit. Antimicrobial resistance gene depletion was defined as a resistance gene absent in the donor at the FMT visit, present in the recipient at the FMT visit, and then absent in the recipient at all subsequent visits. All analyses were performed in R (version 3.3).

RESULTS

Eight FMT donor and recipient pairs were enrolled in the study. All were treatment successes except for FMT recipient number 4, who was a documented treatment failure. No adverse events were reported. A total of 64 metagenomic datasets from the 8 FMT recipients and 8 donors were available. Significant changes in the intestinal microbiota of FMT recipients were observed (Figure 1). As expected, normal commensal bacteria increased in abundance (eg, Bacteroides, Eubacterium) in recipients, whereas opportunistic pathogens decreased (eg, Klebsiella) (Figure 1). At baseline, prior to FMT, quinolone resistance genes (eg, gyrA, gyrB, and parC) were enriched in the recipients, tetracycline resistance genes (eg, tetQ) were enriched in the donors, and aminoglycoside resistance genes (eg, variants of APH) were present at similar levels in donors and recipients. The donors in this study were excluded if they had received antibiotics in the 30 days prior to donation. This exclusion criterion has been widened to 6–12 months in recent FMT procedures, thereby reducing the possible selection of resistance genes in donor stool. A total of 37 genes met the criterion for FMT gene acquisition; there were 93 pair–gene combinations for which there was evidence of acquisition. Of these 93 instances, 72 pair–gene combinations of resistance gene acquisition occurred at visit 1 (3 days post-FMT) and another 13 occurred at visit 2 (7 days post-FMT), suggesting transfer from the donor to recipient. Of the genes possibly acquired, only a few were clinically relevant (eg, ESBL [TEM-33 and OXA-137] and quinolone resistance [gyrB]) (Table 1). A total of 95 resistance genes met the criterion for FMT gene depletion. There was evidence for depletion in 127 pair–gene combinations. Multiple clinically relevant quinolone, β-lactamase, ESBL, and vancomycin resistance genes were depleted in the FMT recipients (Table 1 ).
Figure 1.

Changes in selected genera in microbiota composition after fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT). Each box corresponds to specific bacterial genera; only those genera exhibiting a change of 1 log in relative abundance are presented. Shading corresponds to the log relative abundance of each genera in the donor and in the recipient following FMT (darker = more abundance; lighter or white less abundant or absent). An X indicates a visit with missing data. Rows correspond to FMT donor–recipient pairs. Columns represent study role (donor [D] and recipient [R]) and study visit as follows: D.V0, infusion; R.V0 at FMT; R.V1, 3 days post-FMT; R.V2, 7 days post-FMT; R.V3, 14 days post-FMT; R.V5, 30 days post-FMT; R.V6, 60 days post-FMT; and R.V7, 90 days post-FMT. V4 (not shown) corresponds to a single specimen for 1 recipient, collected outside of the normal study visit schedule.

Table 1.

Evidence for Antimicrobial Resistance Gene Acquisition Following Fecal Microbiota Transplantation for Clostridium difficile Infection

Resistance Gene ClassGenesDonor–Recipient Pair: Acquisition by Visit and Pair
12345678
Selected genes acquired following FMT by visit and pair
 AminoglycosideAAC; APH; AADV5V5V1V3
 Chloramphenicolcat; catSV4V5, V7V2
 β-lactamasecblA-1; cepA; cfxA-cfxA6V2, V3V3V1, V2V1V1, V2V1V1
 TrimethoprimdfrFV3V1V1V1
 MacrolideermB; ermF; ermG; ermQ; ermTV2, V3V2V1, V2V1, V2V1V1V6
 QuinolonegyrBV1
 Mulidrug effluxmdtA; mdtB; mdtC; mdtM; mdtN; mdtP; pmrAV1V1
 Macrolide effluxmefA; melV6V1V1, V2V1, V2V1
 Sulfonamidesul2V5
 ESBLOXA-347; TEM-33V1V1
 Tetracyclinetet32; tet40; tetO; tetQ; tetW; tetXV2, V4, V5V1, V3V1V1V1V1V1V1
Donor–Recipient Pair: Depletion by Pair
12345678
Selected genes depleted following FMT by pair
 β-lactamaseCMY-43; CMY-98; OXY-1, OXY-2; OXY-3-1; OXY-5-111011011
 ESBLCTX-M-40; CTX-M-8; SHV-100; SHV-10600001001
 FosfomycinAny FosA01101011
 PolymyxinPmrC-F00001001
 QuinoloneQnrB1100000010
 VancomycinvanRA; vanXA00100000

Only selected genes are shown. Resistance gene acquisition was defined as a gene present in the donor at the FMT visit; absent in the recipient at or before the FMT visit, and then present in the recipient at any subsequent visit. For each pair, the visit for which the resistance gene was acquired is shown (eg, V1 = visit 1 [2–3 days post-FMT] and V2 = visit 2 [7 days post-FMT]). Resistance gene depletion was defined as a gene absent in the donor at the FMT visit, present in the recipient at the FMT visit, and then absent in the recipient at all subsequent visits. Resistance gene depletion is indicated for each pair by the number 1 in the table.

Abbreviations: ESBL, extended-spectrum β-lactamase; FMT, fecal microbiota transplantation.

Evidence for Antimicrobial Resistance Gene Acquisition Following Fecal Microbiota Transplantation for Clostridium difficile Infection Only selected genes are shown. Resistance gene acquisition was defined as a gene present in the donor at the FMT visit; absent in the recipient at or before the FMT visit, and then present in the recipient at any subsequent visit. For each pair, the visit for which the resistance gene was acquired is shown (eg, V1 = visit 1 [2–3 days post-FMT] and V2 = visit 2 [7 days post-FMT]). Resistance gene depletion was defined as a gene absent in the donor at the FMT visit, present in the recipient at the FMT visit, and then absent in the recipient at all subsequent visits. Resistance gene depletion is indicated for each pair by the number 1 in the table. Abbreviations: ESBL, extended-spectrum β-lactamase; FMT, fecal microbiota transplantation. Changes in selected genera in microbiota composition after fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT). Each box corresponds to specific bacterial genera; only those genera exhibiting a change of 1 log in relative abundance are presented. Shading corresponds to the log relative abundance of each genera in the donor and in the recipient following FMT (darker = more abundance; lighter or white less abundant or absent). An X indicates a visit with missing data. Rows correspond to FMT donor–recipient pairs. Columns represent study role (donor [D] and recipient [R]) and study visit as follows: D.V0, infusion; R.V0 at FMT; R.V1, 3 days post-FMT; R.V2, 7 days post-FMT; R.V3, 14 days post-FMT; R.V5, 30 days post-FMT; R.V6, 60 days post-FMT; and R.V7, 90 days post-FMT. V4 (not shown) corresponds to a single specimen for 1 recipient, collected outside of the normal study visit schedule.

DISCUSSION

This study confirms changes in recipient microbiota composition in response to FMT [12]. These changes in taxonomic composition may contribute to the acquisition and depletion of antimicrobial resistance genes in FMT recipients. We show that antimicrobial resistance gene acquisition from FMT donor stool is likely. Some resistance genes are endogenous to commensal bacteria, so some level of resistance gene exchange is expected. However, several clinically consequential resistance genes emerged in the recipient immediately after FMT; this observation is important for the selection and screening of healthy FMT stool donors and argues for the development of defined microbial communities, low in antimicrobial resistance genes. Information about spontaneous resistance gene acquisition and depletion in healthy subjects would also be useful for understanding the potential risk of resistance gene transmission in FMT. We observed a large depletion of antimicrobial resistance genes as the result of FMT, specifically the loss of multiple clinically relevant antimicrobial resistance genes, including genes belonging to the ESBL, glycopeptide, and quinolone antimicrobial classes. This concurs with other published studies [5, 8]. By changing the composition of the intestinal microbiota, FMT changes the distribution of antimicrobial-resistant gene-carrying organisms. FMT may be a nonpharmacologic approach to managing patients colonized with or at risk from infections due to multidrug-resistant bacteria. It is still not clear how effective or durable this approach could be, but it seems promising.
  11 in total

1.  Illumina sequencing library preparation for highly multiplexed target capture and sequencing.

Authors:  Matthias Meyer; Martin Kircher
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Protoc       Date:  2010-06

2.  The comprehensive antibiotic resistance database.

Authors:  Andrew G McArthur; Nicholas Waglechner; Fazmin Nizam; Austin Yan; Marisa A Azad; Alison J Baylay; Kirandeep Bhullar; Marc J Canova; Gianfranco De Pascale; Linda Ejim; Lindsay Kalan; Andrew M King; Kalinka Koteva; Mariya Morar; Michael R Mulvey; Jonathan S O'Brien; Andrew C Pawlowski; Laura J V Piddock; Peter Spanogiannopoulos; Arlene D Sutherland; Irene Tang; Patricia L Taylor; Maulik Thaker; Wenliang Wang; Marie Yan; Tennison Yu; Gerard D Wright
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2013-05-06       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Fecal Microbiota Transplantation in Patients With Blood Disorders Inhibits Gut Colonization With Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria: Results of a Prospective, Single-Center Study.

Authors:  Jaroslaw Bilinski; Pawel Grzesiowski; Nikolaj Sorensen; Krzysztof Madry; Jacek Muszynski; Katarzyna Robak; Marta Wroblewska; Tomasz Dzieciatkowski; Grazyna Dulny; Jadwiga Dwilewicz-Trojaczek; Wieslaw Wiktor-Jedrzejczak; Grzegorz W Basak
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 9.079

Review 4.  Fecal microbial transplantation as a therapeutic option in patients colonized with antibiotic resistant organisms.

Authors:  Michael Laffin; Braden Millan; Karen L Madsen
Journal:  Gut Microbes       Date:  2017-01-06

5.  Duodenal infusion of donor feces for recurrent Clostridium difficile.

Authors:  Els van Nood; Anne Vrieze; Max Nieuwdorp; Susana Fuentes; Erwin G Zoetendal; Willem M de Vos; Caroline E Visser; Ed J Kuijper; Joep F W M Bartelsman; Jan G P Tijssen; Peter Speelman; Marcel G W Dijkgraaf; Josbert J Keller
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 6.  Fecal microbiota transplantation for the intestinal decolonization of extensively antimicrobial-resistant opportunistic pathogens: a review.

Authors:  Amee R Manges; Theodore S Steiner; Alissa J Wright
Journal:  Infect Dis (Lond)       Date:  2016-05-19

7.  Metagenomic microbial community profiling using unique clade-specific marker genes.

Authors:  Nicola Segata; Levi Waldron; Annalisa Ballarini; Vagheesh Narasimhan; Olivier Jousson; Curtis Huttenhower
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2012-06-10       Impact factor: 28.547

8.  Dynamic changes in short- and long-term bacterial composition following fecal microbiota transplantation for recurrent Clostridium difficile infection.

Authors:  Alexa Weingarden; Antonio González; Yoshiki Vázquez-Baeza; Sophie Weiss; Gregory Humphry; Donna Berg-Lyons; Dan Knights; Tatsuya Unno; Aleh Bobr; Johnthomas Kang; Alexander Khoruts; Rob Knight; Michael J Sadowsky
Journal:  Microbiome       Date:  2015-03-30       Impact factor: 14.650

9.  Recovery of the gut microbiome following fecal microbiota transplantation.

Authors:  Anna M Seekatz; Johannes Aas; Charles E Gessert; Timothy A Rubin; Daniel M Saman; Johan S Bakken; Vincent B Young
Journal:  MBio       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 7.867

10.  Fecal Microbial Transplants Reduce Antibiotic-resistant Genes in Patients With Recurrent Clostridium difficile Infection.

Authors:  Braden Millan; Heekuk Park; Naomi Hotte; Olivier Mathieu; Pierre Burguiere; Thomas A Tompkins; Dina Kao; Karen L Madsen
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2016-03-29       Impact factor: 9.079

View more
  17 in total

1.  Efficacy and safety of fecal microbiota transplantation for decolonization of intestinal multidrug-resistant microorganism carriage: beyond Clostridioides difficile infection.

Authors:  Young Kyung Yoon; Jin Woong Suh; Eun-Ji Kang; Jeong Yeon Kim
Journal:  Ann Med       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 4.709

2.  The Role of Microbiota in Preventing Multidrug-Resistant Bacterial Infections.

Authors:  Yascha Khodamoradi; Johanna Kessel; Jörg Janne Vehreschild; Maria J G T Vehreschild
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2019-10-04       Impact factor: 5.594

Review 3.  Antimicrobial resistance in nephrology.

Authors:  Tina Z Wang; Rosy Priya L Kodiyanplakkal; David P Calfee
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 28.314

Review 4.  Captivity and Animal Microbiomes: Potential Roles of Microbiota for Influencing Animal Conservation.

Authors:  Jason W Dallas; Robin W Warne
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2022-03-22       Impact factor: 4.552

5.  The Use of Microbiome Restoration Therapeutics to Eliminate Intestinal Colonization With Multidrug-Resistant Organisms.

Authors:  Srinivasa Nithin Gopalsamy; Michael H Woodworth; Tiffany Wang; Cynthia T Carpentieri; Nirja Mehta; Rachel J Friedman-Moraco; Aneesh K Mehta; Christian P Larsen; Colleen S Kraft
Journal:  Am J Med Sci       Date:  2018-08-29       Impact factor: 2.378

6.  Impact of Amoxicillin-Clavulanate followed by Autologous Fecal Microbiota Transplantation on Fecal Microbiome Structure and Metabolic Potential.

Authors:  Christopher Bulow; Amy Langdon; Tiffany Hink; Meghan Wallace; Kimberly A Reske; Sanket Patel; Xiaoqing Sun; Sondra Seiler; Susan Jones; Jennie H Kwon; C A Burnham; Gautam Dantas; Erik R Dubberke
Journal:  mSphere       Date:  2018-11-21       Impact factor: 4.389

Review 7.  Gut Microbiota Modulation for Multidrug-Resistant Organism Decolonization: Present and Future Perspectives.

Authors:  Livia Gargiullo; Federica Del Chierico; Patrizia D'Argenio; Lorenza Putignani
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2019-07-25       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 8.  Potential Application of Combined Therapy with Lectins as a Therapeutic Strategy for the Treatment of Bacterial Infections.

Authors:  João Victor de Oliveira Santos; Ana Lúcia Figueiredo Porto; Isabella Macário Ferro Cavalcanti
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-02

9.  Fecal Transplant in Children With Clostridioides difficile Gives Sustained Reduction in Antimicrobial Resistance and Potential Pathogen Burden.

Authors:  Suchitra K Hourigan; Michelle Ahn; Keylie M Gibson; Marcos Pérez-Losada; Grace Felix; Melissa Weidner; Ian Leibowitz; John E Niederhuber; Cynthia L Sears; Keith A Crandall; Maria Oliva-Hemker
Journal:  Open Forum Infect Dis       Date:  2019-08-26       Impact factor: 3.835

Review 10.  The Intestinal Microbiota as a Reservoir and a Therapeutic Target to Fight Multi-Drug-Resistant Bacteria: A Narrative Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Andrea Aira; Csaba Fehér; Elisa Rubio; Alex Soriano
Journal:  Infect Dis Ther       Date:  2019-10-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.