BACKGROUND: The aim of this prospective cohort study was to evaluate the efficacy of maternal screening for congenital cytomegalovirus infection (CCI) using cytomegalovirus (CMV) immunoglobulin G (IgG) and the IgG avidity index (AI). METHODS: Pregnant women underwent screening of CMV IgG and AI measurements. IgG-negative women underwent remeasurement of IgG after educational intervention. Women with an AI ≤45% received further examinations, including measurement of CMV IgM. All newborns received polymerase chain reaction analyses of the urine, and CCI was diagnosed by the detection of CMV-DNA in the urine. Primary infection was defined as an AI <35% and/or positive IgM (>1.20 index). Serum samples from women with an AI >45% were stored, and the IgM levels were measured after delivery. The efficacy of AI and IgM for CCI screening was compared. RESULTS: A total of 1562 (71.2%) women tested positive for IgG. In this study, 10 newborns with CCI were detected. The presence of infection in 3 newborns from mothers with primary infection was predicted by screening of IgG and AI <35%. However, infection in 7 newborns from women with nonprimary infection could not be predicted by screening of CMV IgG, AI <35%, or IgM. The application of an AI <35% for CCI screening yielded 22.2% sensitivity, 95.0% specificity, 2.5% positive predictive value, and 99.5% negative predictive value and was similar to that of IgM (11.1% sensitivity, 93.2% specificity, 0.9% positive predictive value, and 92.7% negative predictive value). CONCLUSIONS: Maternal screening using CMV IgG and AI can identify pregnancies with CCI from primary infection, but overlooks a number of those from nonprimary infection.
BACKGROUND: The aim of this prospective cohort study was to evaluate the efficacy of maternal screening for congenital cytomegalovirus infection (CCI) using cytomegalovirus (CMV) immunoglobulin G (IgG) and the IgG avidity index (AI). METHODS: Pregnant women underwent screening of CMV IgG and AI measurements. IgG-negative women underwent remeasurement of IgG after educational intervention. Women with an AI ≤45% received further examinations, including measurement of CMV IgM. All newborns received polymerase chain reaction analyses of the urine, and CCI was diagnosed by the detection of CMV-DNA in the urine. Primary infection was defined as an AI <35% and/or positive IgM (>1.20 index). Serum samples from women with an AI >45% were stored, and the IgM levels were measured after delivery. The efficacy of AI and IgM for CCI screening was compared. RESULTS: A total of 1562 (71.2%) women tested positive for IgG. In this study, 10 newborns with CCI were detected. The presence of infection in 3 newborns from mothers with primary infection was predicted by screening of IgG and AI <35%. However, infection in 7 newborns from women with nonprimary infection could not be predicted by screening of CMV IgG, AI <35%, or IgM. The application of an AI <35% for CCI screening yielded 22.2% sensitivity, 95.0% specificity, 2.5% positive predictive value, and 99.5% negative predictive value and was similar to that of IgM (11.1% sensitivity, 93.2% specificity, 0.9% positive predictive value, and 92.7% negative predictive value). CONCLUSIONS: Maternal screening using CMV IgG and AI can identify pregnancies with CCI from primary infection, but overlooks a number of those from nonprimary infection.
Authors: Bettie Voordouw; Barry Rockx; Thomas Jaenisch; Pieter Fraaij; Philippe Mayaud; Ann Vossen; Marion Koopmans Journal: Clin Microbiol Rev Date: 2019-12-11 Impact factor: 26.132