| Literature DB >> 29020084 |
Maslin Osathanunkul1,2, Sarawut Ounjai1, Rossarin Osathanunkul3, Panagiotis Madesis4.
Abstract
It is long believed that some spices may help protect against certain chronic conditions. Spices are usually parts of plants that have been powdered into small pieces. Have you ever wondered what the curry powder in your dish is made of? The aim of this work was to develop an appropriate DNA-based method for assessment of spice identity. Selecting the best marker for species recognition in the Zingiberaceae family. Six DNA regions were investigated in silico, including ITS, matK, rbcL, rpoC, trnH-psbA and trnL. Then, only four regions (ITS, matK, rbcL and trnH-psbA) were included in the simulated HRM (High-resolution Melting) analysis as the results from previous analysis showed that rpoC and trnL may not be suitable to be used to identify Zingiberaceae species in HRM analysis based on both the percentage of nucleotide variation and GC content. Simulated HRM analysis was performed to test the feasibility of Bar-HRM. We found that ITS2 is the most effective region to be used for identification of the studied species and thus was used in laboratory HRM analysis. All seven tested Zingiberaceae plants were then able to be distinguished using the ITS2 primers in laboratory HRM. Most importantly the melting curves gained from fresh and dried tissue overlapped, which is a crucial outcome for the applicability of the analysis. The method could be used in an authentication test for dried products. In the authentication test, only one of seven store-sold Zingiberaceae products that were tested contained the species listed on their labels, while we found substitution/contamination of the tested purchased products in the rest.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29020084 PMCID: PMC5636142 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186283
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Retrieved sequences of Zingiberaceae from GenBank of six selected regions, including matK, rbcL, rpoC, trnH-psbA, trnL and ITS.
Numbers of sequences from each genus are indicated.
Plants and spice products included in this study.
| No. | Scientific Name | HRM analysis | Commercial product | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Simulated | Laboratory | |||
| Accession Number | Voucher Number | |||
| 1 | - | QBG 3640 | P6.0-P6.1, | |
| 2 | FJ972779, JF953193, FJ972790, GQ118657 | - | - | |
| 3 | - | QBG 36908 | P7.0-P7.1 | |
| 4 | AF478726, KM983426, HM749001 | QBG 30400 | P4.0-P4.6 | |
| 5 | JQ409924, AB551931, KC441134, KC597940 | QBG 78245 | P2.0-P2.6 | |
| 6 | JQ409976, AB047743, KC441189, KC597942 | - | - | |
| 7 | KU159396, KU159407, KX559433, X559391 | QBG 46181 | P3.0-P3.6 | |
| 8 | DQ064585, KC598023, KC598029, KC597868 | QBG 78341 | P5.0-P5.6 | |
| 9 | KR816715, KC598025, GU180524, EU552521 | QBG 46145 | P1.0-P1.6 | |
| 10 | KC582875, HM367680, KC598032, KC597871 | - | - | |
*Accession Number of sequences from ITS, matK, rbcL, and trnH-psbA regions, respectively
** rbcL sequence of the species was not included in the simulated HRM analysis due to lack of sequence in database (GenBank)
Store locations and products.
| Store # | Store location (coordinates) | Product | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 18.785149, 98.991650 | |||||||
| 1 | 18.791640, 98.998779 | |||||||
| 2 | 18.722076, 98.958554 | x | x | |||||
| 3 | 18.787966, 98.991336 | x | ||||||
| 4 | 18.742528, 99.122746 | x | ||||||
| 5 | 18.735272, 99.017258 | x | x | |||||
| 6 | 18.790268, 99.000587 | x | x | |||||
● Products included in this study
X No products
Search results of the selected DNA regions of Zingiberaceae species retrieved from GenBank.
| Regions | Number of | Length (bp) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sequences | Genera | Min | Max | |
| 879 | 48 | 209 | 3,315 | |
| 425 | 16 | 153 | 1,548 | |
| 60 | 7 | 501 | 501 | |
| 647 | 4 | 153 | 1,243 | |
| 436 | 35 | 191 | 1,197 | |
| ITS | 930 | 50 | 208 | 2,661 |
Zingiberaceae sequence profile of the selected regions (matK, rbcL, rpoC, trnH-psbA, trnL and ITS) in the analysis dataset.
| Markers | ITS | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sequences in analysis dataset | 242 | 323 | 60 | 87 | 102 | 252 |
| Length (bp) | 686 | 471 | 501 | 830 | 976 | 776 |
| Variable sites (%) | 36.88 | 12.95 | 3.79 | 11.69 | 16.49 | 69.07 |
| Average %GC content | 29.3 | 44.0 | 38.9 | 29.5 | 33.1 | 55.8 |
Fig 2Simulated prediction of fluorescent high-resolution DNA melting curves of PCR products from (A) rbcL (B) matK (C) trnH-psbA and (D) ITS. Sequences or fragments of eight different plant species in Zingiberaceae were included in the analyses of three regions (matK, trnH-psbA and ITS), but only seven plant species of rbcL were included.
Fig 3The melting profiles of amplicons generated from trnH-psbA (A-B), ITS1 (C-D) and ITS2 (E-F). The HRM analyses were performed in triplicate on each of the three taxa included Zingiber officinale, Curcuma longa and Boesenbergia rotunda. Fresh samples are represented with a thin line and the dried samples with a dotted line.
Fig 4Melting profiles of ITS2 amplicons in HRM analyses, (A) of seven tested Zingiberaceae species. Fresh samples are represented with a thin line, and the dried samples with a dotted line. Average Tm values from three replicates of each plant species were presented. The fluorescent melting curves from ITS2 amplicons of spice products; (B) Zingiber officinale, (C) Curcuma longa, (D) Kaempferia parviflora, (E) Boesenbergia rotunda, (F) Zingiber montanum, (G) Alpinia galangal, and (H) Amomum uliginosum in an authentication assay. The coloured thin line indicates the reference sample of each plant species. The dotted lines with the colour as same as the reference samples indicate products containing the plant species as labelled. The grey lines indicate products that did not contain the plant species as labelled.
Bar-HRM identifications of the tested spice products.
| Species on the label | Product code | Bar-HRM | Species on the label | Product code | Bar-HRM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P1.0 | P4.0 | ||||
| P1.1 | P4.1 | ||||
| P1.2 | P4.2 | X | |||
| P1.3 | P4.3 | X | |||
| P1.4 | P4.4 | X | |||
| P1.5 | X | P4.5 | |||
| P1.6 | P4.6 | X | |||
| P2.0 | P5.0 | ||||
| P2.1 | X | P5.1 | X | ||
| P2.2 | X | P5.2 | X | ||
| P2.3 | X | P5.3 | X | ||
| P2.4 | X | P5.4 | X | ||
| P2.5 | X | P5.5 | X | ||
| P2.6 | X | P5.6 | X | ||
| P3.0 | P6.0 | ||||
| P3.1 | P6.1 | X | |||
| P3.2 | X | P6.3 | X | ||
| P3.3 | X | P6.4 | X | ||
| P3.4 | X | P7.0 | |||
| P3.5 | P7.1 | ||||
| P3.6 | x |
● Results from the Bar-HRM analysis indicated the same plant species as on the label
x Results from the Bar-HRM analysis indicated different plant species as labelled
* Products purchased from the same store were given the same number after ‘.’(dot) in product code