Literature DB >> 2901993

Comparison of the new antihistamine acrivastine (BW 825C) versus cyproheptadine in the treatment of idiopathic cold urticaria.

H Neittaanmäki1, J E Fräki, J R Gibson.   

Abstract

A double-blind, crossover trial with a new triprolidine derivative, acrivastine (BW 825C; 8 mg 3 times daily), cyproheptadine (4 mg 3 times daily) and placebo was carried out in 18 patients suffering from idiopathic cold urticaria. Acrivastine and cyproheptadine significantly (p less than 0.01) reduced weal areas following ice cube challenge when compared to placebo. Acrivastine was found to be significantly more effective (p less than 0.01) than cyproheptadine in reducing weal areas. Furthermore, cyproheptadine caused significantly more drowsiness than acrivastine (p = 0.021) or placebo (p = 0.013), which did not differ from each other. This study shows that acrivastine is an effective agent in the treatment of cold urticaria and suggests that acrivastine in the dose used lacks adverse effects, such as drowsiness, traditionally associated with antihistamine therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 2901993     DOI: 10.1159/000248523

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dermatologica        ISSN: 0011-9075


  3 in total

Review 1.  The antihistamines of the nineties.

Authors:  M M Janssens; P H Howarth
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy       Date:  1993

Review 2.  Acrivastine. A review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic efficacy in allergic rhinitis, urticaria and related disorders.

Authors:  R N Brogden; D McTavish
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 3.  Urticaria. Recognition, causes and treatment.

Authors:  A D Ormerod
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 9.546

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.