Literature DB >> 29019803

The SPOT GRADE: A New Method for Reproducibly Quantifying Surgical Wound Bleeding.

William D Spotnitz1,2, Dirk Zielske2, Valerie Centis1, Rachel Hoffman3, Daniel L Gillen4, Catherine Wittmann2, Vincent Guyot2, Doris M Campos2, Patricia Forest2, Alan Pearson5, Paul C McAfee6.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Benchtop model with prospective surgeon video testing.
OBJECTIVE: To create a surface bleeding severity scale, the SPOT GRADE (SG), for quantitative assessment of target bleeding site (TBS) blood loss. This is of particular interest for spinal surgery due to epidural bleeding and an inability to use diathermy and radiofrequency cautery close to nerve roots. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: A novel apparatus perfusable at known flow rates and simulating different sized wounds was used to create movies to educate surgeons on specific degrees of bleeding.
METHODS: Training (36) and testing (108) videos were created using a benchtop apparatus employing different bleeding severities based on the six-level SG (none, minimal, mild, moderate, severe, and extreme) and TBS sizes (1, 10, and 50 cm). Fourteen surgeons in four specialties (cardiothoracic, abdominal, spine, and orthopedic lower extremity) were trained and tested to evaluate SG characteristics including inter-rater and intrarater reliability.
RESULTS: The interclass correlation coefficient was estimated to be 0.89840 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.85771, 1), whereas the intraclass correlation coefficient was estimated to be 0.93673 (95% CI: 0.89603, 1). In 98% of cases (95% CI: 0.9736, 0.9927), surgeons correctly identified eligible bleeds for a future clinical trial (scores = 1, 2, or 3) and in 91% of cases (95% CI: 0.8895, 0.9344), surgeons correctly identified noneligible bleeds (scores = 4 or 5). In 98.6% of cases (95% CI: 0.9777, 0.9945), physicians correctly identified true hemostasis (score = 0). Based upon these data the probability of a physician rating a bleed incorrectly as hemostasis (score = 0) is estimated to be 1.51% (95% CI: 0.0061, 0.0363).
CONCLUSION: This SG is reproducible and reliable providing a basis for educating surgeons on TBS blood loss. It appears to be a new standard for evaluating wound blood loss. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29019803     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002447

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  2 in total

1.  SPOT GRADE II: Clinical Validation of a New Method for Reproducibly Quantifying Surgical Wound Bleeding: Prospective, Multicenter, Multispecialty, Single-Arm Study.

Authors:  Daniel J Del Gaizo; William D Spotnitz; Rachel W Hoffman; Mark Christopher Hermann; Linda S Sher; Russell H Spotnitz; Yuri S Genyk; Ian J Schorn; Daniel L Gillen; Bobby L White; Bruce G Miller; Roberto J Manson
Journal:  Clin Appl Thromb Hemost       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 2.389

2.  Prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled trial evaluating the performance of a novel combination powder vs hemostatic matrix in cardiothoracic operations.

Authors:  Nicholas C Dang; Abbas Ardehali; Brian A Bruckner; Patrick E Parrino; Daniel L Gillen; Rachel W Hoffman; Russell Spotnitz; Stephanie Cavoores; Ian J Shorn; Roberto J Manson; William D Spotnitz
Journal:  J Card Surg       Date:  2019-11-25       Impact factor: 1.620

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.