Literature DB >> 29018971

CSF RBC count in successful first-attempt lumbar puncture: the interest of atraumatic needle use.

Dimitri Renard1, Eric Thouvenot2,3.   

Abstract

The objective of this study is to analyze CSF red blood cell (RBC) count from first-attempt lumbar punctures and to analyze parameters associated with first-attempt lumbar punctures and hemorrhagic lumbar puncture. This is a prospective analysis of consecutive patients who underwent lumbar puncture for any reason other than suspected acute subarachnoid hemorrhage. Analyzed parameters were the following: age, indication for lumbar puncture, aPTT ratio, PTT, platelet count, patient's position, needle type (atraumatic/standard), needle diameter, person performing lumbar puncture (medical student/resident/attending physician), number of lumbar levels punctured, necessity of needle repositioning, CSF RBC and white blood cell count, and protein level. Lumbar puncture resulting in RBC count > 5 RBC/mm2 was classified as hemorrhagic lumbar puncture (different cut-offs were studied: > 5/> 10/> 100/> 500/> 1000 RBC). In total, 169 elective lumbar punctures in 165 different patients were included. First-attempt lumbar puncture occurred in 22% > 5 RBC, in 19.5% > 10 RBC, in 4.5% > 100 RBC, in 3% > 500 RBC, and 1.5% > 1000 RBC count. First-attempt lumbar puncture was associated with non-hemorrhagic lumbar puncture for each of the RBC count cut-offs (OR for non-hemorrhagic lumbar puncture in first-attempt lumbar puncture 2.8, 95% CI 1.4-5.7). The presence of a hemorrhagic disorder (concerning cerebral amyloid angiopathy in all patients) and higher aPTT ratio were associated with hemorrhagic lumbar puncture. Atraumatic needle use was associated with non-hemorrhagic lumbar puncture for RBC count cut-offs ≤ 5 and ≤ 10 RBC (OR for non-hemorrhagic lumbar puncture in atraumatic needle use 2.5 [95% CI 1.3-4.8] and 2.2 [95% CI 1.1-4.4], respectively). First-attempt lumbar puncture and hemorrhagic lumbar puncture were not associated with other parameters. Slightly elevated CSF RBC count after first-attempt lumbar puncture occurs relatively frequently, but is even more frequent in non-first-attempt lumbar puncture. Atraumatic needle use is associated with non-hemorrhagic lumbar puncture.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hemorrhagic; Lumbar puncture; Needle

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29018971     DOI: 10.1007/s10072-017-3142-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurol Sci        ISSN: 1590-1874            Impact factor:   3.307


  10 in total

1.  Incidence of traumatic lumbar puncture.

Authors:  Kaushal H Shah; Kathleen M Richard; Sarah Nicholas; Jonathan A Edlow
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.451

2.  "Traumatic tap" proportion in pediatric lumbar puncture.

Authors:  Dante Pappano
Journal:  Pediatr Emerg Care       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.454

3.  Standard vs atraumatic Whitacre needle for diagnostic lumbar puncture: a randomized trial.

Authors:  R Lavi; D Yarnitsky; D Yernitzky; J M Rowe; A Weissman; D Segal; I Avivi
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2006-10-24       Impact factor: 9.910

4.  "Atraumatic" Sprotte needle reduces the incidence of post-lumbar puncture headaches.

Authors:  M Strupp; O Schueler; A Straube; S Von Stuckrad-Barre; T Brandt
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2001-12-26       Impact factor: 9.910

5.  Risk factors for traumatic and bloody lumbar puncture in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Authors:  Scott C Howard; Amar J Gajjar; Cheng Cheng; Stephen B Kritchevsky; Grant W Somes; Patricia L Harrison; Raul C Ribeiro; Gaston K Rivera; Jeffrey E Rubnitz; John T Sandlund; Alberto J de Armendi; Bassem I Razzouk; Ching-Hon Pui
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002 Oct 23-30       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Incidence of traumatic lumbar puncture: experience of a large, tertiary care pediatric hospital.

Authors:  Miguel M Glatstein; Merav Zucker-Toledano; Alper Arik; Dennis Scolnik; Asaf Oren; Shimon Reif
Journal:  Clin Pediatr (Phila)       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 1.168

7.  Are atraumatic spinal needles as efficient as traumatic needles for lumbar puncture?

Authors:  N Pelzer; J Vandersteene; T J S Bekooij; G G Schoonman; P W Wirtz; L J Vanopdenbosch; H Koppen
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 3.307

8.  Randomised controlled trial of atraumatic versus standard needles for diagnostic lumbar puncture.

Authors:  S R Thomas; D R Jamieson; K W Muir
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-10-21

Review 9.  Distinguishing traumatic lumbar puncture from true subarachnoid hemorrhage.

Authors:  Kaushal H Shah; Jonathan A Edlow
Journal:  J Emerg Med       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 1.484

10.  Interpreting red blood cells in lumbar puncture: distinguishing true subarachnoid hemorrhage from traumatic tap.

Authors:  Amanda D Czuczman; Lisa E Thomas; Alyson B Boulanger; David A Peak; Emily L Senecal; David F Brown; Keith A Marill
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 3.451

  10 in total
  2 in total

1.  Bioimpedance spinal needle provides high success and low complication rate in lumbar punctures of pediatric patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Authors:  Satu Långström; Anu Huurre; Juho Kari; Olli Lohi; Harri Sievänen; Sauli Palmu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-26       Impact factor: 4.996

2.  Specific lumbar puncture training during clinical clerkship durably increases atraumatic needle use.

Authors:  Xavier Moisset; Bruno Pereira; Carole Jamet; Alexandre Saturnin; Pierre Clavelou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-06-10       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.