Literature DB >> 29018254

Genetic variation of Sporothrix globosa isolates from diverse geographic and clinical origins in China.

Lipei Zhao1, Yan Cui1, Yu Zhen1, Lei Yao1, Ying Shi1, Yang Song1, Ruili Chen1, Shanshan Li1.   

Abstract

Sporothrix globosa is the main causative agent of sporotrichosis, a common mycosis that usually affects the skin, in China. Despite increasing efforts in the molecular identification of this fungal pathogen, its modes of transmission and epidemiology remain poorly understood. The goals of this study were to assess the genetic diversity of S. globosa using amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) analysis and to assess the correlation of AFLP profiles with the geographic origins, growth rates, clinical forms, and antifungal susceptibilities of S. globosa isolates. AFLP analysis of 225 clinical S. globosa isolates from eight provinces or municipalities in China identified eight distinct clustering groups (I-VIII), with groups I, II and IV being the most common. The AFLP genotypes showed distinct distribution patterns among different regions within Jilin Province and between northern and southern China, but there was no obvious association between the AFLP genotypes and the growth rates, clinical forms or antifungal susceptibilities of the S. globosa isolates. These results expand our understanding of the genetic variation of S. globosa and suggest that AFLP analysis is a potentially useful tool for studying the epidemiology of this fungal pathogen.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29018254      PMCID: PMC5658771          DOI: 10.1038/emi.2017.75

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Microbes Infect        ISSN: 2222-1751            Impact factor:   7.163


INTRODUCTION

Sporotrichosis is a common chronic deep mycosis caused by the dimorphic fungus Sporothrix schenckii.[1] Based on its clinical manifestations, sporotrichosis can be classified into fixed cutaneous, lymphocutaneous, disseminated cutaneous and extracutaneous forms. Sporotrichosis was first described in 1898 in the United States[2] and has since been reported worldwide, with a high prevalence in tropical and subtropical areas. While S. schenckii has long been considered a single species, increasing numbers of phenotypic and molecular studies suggest that the pathogenic Sporothrix species comprises at least four closely related but clearly distinct species, including S. schenckii sensu stricto, S. globosa, S. brasiliensis and S. luriei.[3, 4] Among them, S. globosa is perhaps the most extensively studied, with reports from North, Central, and South America, Europe and Asia.[5, 6] Since the first report of sporotrichosis in China in 1916, the incidence of the disease has continued to increase. Several outbreaks have been reported, particularly in Jilin Province, where the largest number of sporotrichosis cases in China have been recorded.[7, 8] Many molecular studies have demonstrated that S. globosa is the most prevalent etiologic agent of sporotrichosis in China.[8, 9, 10, 11, 12] Several retrospective studies of clinical S. schenckii isolates from China using random amplified polymorphic DNA analysis[13, 14] and restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis[15] have shown a correlation among the genotypes, clinical forms, and geographic origins of isolates, although S. schenckii was not differentiated from S. globosa or other Sporothrix species. Amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) analysis is a highly sensitive method for detecting DNA polymorphisms and has been widely used for genetic variation and linkage analysis of bacteria, plants, and animals as well as fungi. When this technique was used to examine the genetic diversity of S. schenckii isolates in Peru, two distinct clusters were noted, although there was no correlation between these AFLP genotypes and the geographical origins or clinical manifestations of the disease.[16] Recently, Zhang et al.[17] applied AFLP analysis to 20 S. globosa isolates of diverse geographic origins, including nine isolates from China, and found that all isolates were tightly clustered into the same group. However, the study gave no detail on the genetic diversity of the nine isolates from China, and any geographic and phenotypic associations were not reported. In the present study, we used AFLP analysis to examine 225 clinical S. globosa isolates from eight provinces or municipalities in China with the aim of identifying any correlations between AFLP profiles and the geographic origins, growth rates, clinical characteristics and antifungal susceptibilities of the isolates.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fungal isolates and cultivation

A total of 225 clinical S. globosa isolates from China were included in this study. The isolates were collected between 2009 and 2013 from patients with sporotrichosis (one isolate per patient). The samples were collected at six hospitals, with the patients originating from eight different provinces or municipalities in China (Figure 1 and Table 1). Twenty four of the isolates had been previously identified as S. globosa based on sequence analysis of the calmodulin gene (CAL; Shiying, 2015, unpublished data). These sequences are available from the GenBank database using the accession numbers listed in Table 1. Demographic information and clinical manifestation data for each patient were provided by the investigators at each hospital (Table 1). Aspergillus fumigatus strain IFM40808 (wild-type) and three S. globosa isolates (ATCC MYA-4911, ATCC MYA-4912, and ATCC MYA-4914) were used as controls for AFLP analysis. These strains were provided as a gift by the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College. All isolates were inoculated onto potato dextrose agar slants and cultured at 28 °C for 7 days.
Figure 1

Geographical origins of the Sporothrix globosa isolates studied in this work.

Table 1

Clinical isolates of Sporothrix globosa included in the study

 LocationIsolate IDaYear of identificationGender (M/F)Age (year)Clinical form (D, F, L, E)bGenBank Accession code
Jilin ProvinceBaicheng CityFHJU09033102c2009M4FKY349948
  FHJU090602012009F56LKY349946
  FHJU090729022009F42FKY349944
  FHJU100427022010M41LKY350105
  FHJU110214042011F11LKY349942
  FHJU110303012011F49LKY349947
  FHJU110518032011M0.25FKY350125
  FHJU11053102c2011F57DKY350126
  FHJU110704052011F3FKY349943
  FHJU111103012011F43FKY349940
  FHJU111228052011M34FKY349945
  FHJU120220052012F15LKY349934
  FHJU120617042012F44FKY349939
  FHJU130419042013F53FKY349941
 Baishan CityFHJU090426012009F54FKY349965
  FHJU10122702c2010F24FKY350091
  FHJU13031801c2013F51FKY349978
 Changchun CityFHJU090307022009M9FKY350078
  FHJU090321012009M57FKY350061
  FHJU090415012009M13FKY350075
  FHJU091125012009F56LKY350073
  FHJU091204012009F53LKY350068
  FHJU091219012009F29FKY350046
  FHJU100410012010F9FKY350123
  FHJU100413022010F73LKY350085
  FHJU100426012010F38LKY350116
  FHJU100427012010F27LKY350110
  FHJU100526012010F17LKY350109
  FHJU101222012010M5FKY350088
  FHJU101227032010F2FKY350090
  FHJU10122903c2010F74LKY350101
  FHJU101229042010F59FKY350086
  FHJU101230032010F4FKY350120
  FHJU101231032010M5FKY350092
  FHJU10082301c2011F73EKY350117
  FHJU110104022011F60FKY350054
  FHJU110211052011F65FKY350060
  FHJU110218022011M58FKY350064
  FHJU110225042011F48FKY350058
  FHJU110301022011F53LKY350071
  FHJU110502052011F62LKY350133
  FHJU11050502c2011M0.25FKY350094
  FHJU110507032011F4LKY350080
  FHJU110513012011F22FKY350098
  FHJU110513062011F47LKY350134
  FHJU11051601c2011F77LKY350074
  FHJU110609012011M9LKY350097
  FHJU110610012011F28FKY350041
  FHJU11062001c2011F56DKY350056
  FHJU11101901c2011M78FKY350044
  FHJU11102601c2011F59FKY350076
  FHJU111121022011F40FKY350072
  FHJU111212032011F39LKY350055
  FHJU120109032012F65FKY350059
  FHJU120129012012F45FKY350057
  FHJU120130032012F68LKY350077
  FHJU120204012012F42FKY350082
  FHJU120212012012F51LKY350084
  FHJU120215062012F54LKY350093
  FHJU120308022012F9FKY350040
  FHJU120319012012F46FKY350069
  FHJU120319032012M33FKY350042
  FHJU120324012012F60LKY350062
  FHJU120406032012M43FKY350095
  FHJU120416012012F62LKY350096
  FHJU120429012012F3FKY350081
  FHJU120503052012F48FKY350065
  FHJU120504032012F9LKY350039
  FHJU120522022012F79FKY350063
  FHJU120523022012F62LKY350079
  FHJU120604022012F45LKY350066
  FHJU120607022012F50FKY350043
  FHJU120615032012F47FKY350067
  FHJU120616012012F37FKY350083
  FHJU120623012012F6FKY350045
  FHJU120820022012F64FKY350070
  FHJU130323022013M17FKY350001
 Jilin CityFHJU090416022009F45LKY349981
  FHJU09041603c2009M0.3FKY349980
  FHJU090420022009M44LKY349989
  FHJU090428012009F52LKY349967
  FHJU10051701c2010F67FKY350112
  FHJU110306012011M9FKY349991
  FHJU110308032011F75LKY350129
  FHJU110520012011M4FKY349993
  FHJU11102001c2011M4FKY349972
  FHJU120104022012F68LKY349982
  FHJU120105022012F59LKY349986
  FHJU120216022012F44LKY349987
  FHJU120216032012F12FKY349974
  FHJU120220032012F76LKY349985
  FHJU120306042012F5FKY349988
  FHJU120312062012M60FKY349983
  FHJU120326012012M6FKY349992
  FHJU120403042012M12FKY349990
  FHJU120626022012F54LKY349984
  FHJU120911012012F59LKY349973
 Liaoyuan CityFHJU090203012009F59LKY350008
  FHJU090526012009M61LKY350007
  FHJU10020301c2010F55LKY350113
  FHJU100609012010M51FKY350099
  FHJU110213012011F46FKY349979
  FHJU11021806c2011M48DKY349976
  FHJU11061302c2011F70LKY350006
  FHJU11070404c2011M59LKY350005
  FHJU111205032011M1.5FKY349994
  FHJU120617022012F28LKY350004
  FHJU130411022013F42FKY349975
 Siping CityFHJU090227022009F44FKY350127
  FHJU090305012009F7FKY350131
  FHJU090331052009M1LKY350011
  FHJU090901012009F59FKY350015
  FHJU091126012009F4FKY350020
  FHJU10042303c2010M29FKY350121
  FHJU100511012010M2FKY350103
  FHJU100524012010F50FKY350107
  FHJU100801012010F36FKY350100
  FHJU101215012010M1FKY350087
  FHJU101231012010F41FKY350102
  FHJU110110042011M3FKY349996
  FHJU11011202c2011F47LKY350034
  FHJU110211072011F6LKY350012
  FHJU110222012011M48LKY349998
  FHJU110228022011F67LKY350018
  FHJU110304032011F60FKY350014
  FHJU110425022011F19LKY350016
  FHJU110502012011F30LKY349999
  FHJU110602022011M28FKY350013
  FHJU110615012011F63LKY350017
  FHJU110826012011F60FKY350024
  FHJU111206012011M7LKY350021
  FHJU111206022011M7LKY350038
  FHJU120202012012F55FKY350023
  FHJU120228032012M2FKY350037
  FHJU12033001c2012M82LKY350009
  FHJU12040302c2012F70FKY349995
  FHJU120410042012F44FKY350130
  FHJU120509032012M55LKY350022
  FHJU120516052012F24FKY350010
  FHJU120629012012F4FKY350000
  FHJU120809012012F54FKY349997
  FHJU130323012013M14LKY350019
 Songyuan CityFHJU100204012010F47LKY350108
  FHJU10042001c2010M3FKY350111
  FHJU100515012010M3FKY350104
  FHJU10060202c2010M0.5FKY350106
  FHJU101224012010M5FKY350089
  FHJU11021402c2011F52DKY349968
  FHJU11021405c2011F48DKY349950
  FHJU110217012011M39LKY349954
  FHJU110221032011M4FKY349953
  FHJU110224022011M6LKY349952
  FHJU11022602c2011F6FKY349955
  FHJU110301012011M7LKY349936
  FHJU110303042011F24FKY349949
  FHJU110307022011F54FKY349956
  FHJU110509032011M11FKY349938
  FHJU110517022011F62LKY350122
  FHJU110520022011F27LKY350032
  FHJU110524022011F62LKY350124
  FHJU110525012011M43LKY349958
  FHJU110616052011M48LKY349963
  FHJU110620062011F50FKY350028
  FHJU11081502c2011M25FKY349970
  FHJU110906022011F58FKY349957
  FHJU11112801c2011M55FKY349969
  FHJU111205022011F75FKY350132
  FHJU111212012011F29LKY349959
  FHJU120131022012M64FKY350036
  FHJU120214022012F62LKY350029
  FHJU120221022012F54LKY349971
  FHJU12030101c2012F58LKY349964
  FHJU12030203c2012M50DKY350030
  FHJU120309012012M43FKY350035
  FHJU120326022012F58FKY350031
  FHJU120328042012F5FKY349935
  FHJU12040301c2012F53LKY349960
  FHJU12041002c2012F45FKY349951
  FHJU120419022012M55FKY350033
  FHJU120510022012F64FKY349966
  FHJU120822012012F55LKY349937
  FHJU13031803c2013F46FKY349962
  FHJU130405012013M10FKY349961
 Tonghua CityFHJU110217022011M36FKY350026
  FHJU110620052011F51FKY350128
  FHJU11081801c2011F9FKY350053
  FHJU111111022011M44LKY350050
  FHJU111224022011F50FKY350027
  FHJU120530012012F49FKY350025
  FHJU130226012013F58LKY350003
  FHJU13051103c2013F7FKY350002
 Yanbian Korean Autonomous PrefectureFHJU11102401c2011F3FKY350047
  FHJU11121301c2011F77LKY350049
  FHJU111226022011M7LKY350118
  FHJU120312042012F68LKY350119
  FHJU12040702c2012M65FKY350115
Neimenggu Autonomous RegionTongliao CityFHJU11021401c2011F41FKY350052
  FHJU12032202c2012F60LKY350051
  FHJU120411012012M4FKY350048
Heilongjiang ProvinceWuchang CityFHJU11050101c2011M7LKY349977
 Hegang CityFHJU12071101c2012M64FKY350114
Jiangsu CMCC1    KR075722d
Jiangsu CMCC2    KR075723d
Jiangsu CMCC3    KR075724d
Jiangsu CMCC4    KR075725d
Jiangsu CMCC5    KR075726d
Chongqing CQMU11    KR075728d
Chongqing CQMU2    KR075729d
Chongqing CQMU3    KR075730d
Chongqing CQMU4    KR075731d
Chongqing CQMU5    KR075762d
Chongqing CQMU6    KR075732d
Chongqing CQMU7    KR075763d
Chongqing CQMU8    KR075733d
Beijing FHPU3    KR075744d
Beijing FHPU4    KR075745d
Beijing FHPU5    KR075746d
Beijing FHPU7    KR075748d
Guangdong SHZU2    KR075750d
Guangdong SHZU5    KR075753d
Guangdong SHZU6    KR075754d
Sichuan WHSU1    KR075758d
Sichuan WHSU3    KR075759d
Sichuan WHSU4    KR075760d
Sichuan WHSU5    KR075761d

Abbreviations: female, F; male, M.

The first four alphabet letters in the isolate ID represent abbreviations for the following hospitals: FHJU, The First Hospital of Jilin University; CCMC, Institute of Dermatology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College; CQMU, the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University; FHPU, Peking University First Hospital; SHZU, Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhongshan University; WHSU, West China Hospital of Sichuan University.

F—fixed cutaneous; L—lymphocutaneous; D—disseminated cutaneous; E—extracutaneous.

Isolates which performed the antifungal susceptibility.

These 24 isolates were previously identified as S. globosa by Shiying (2015, unpubil. data).

Morphological and physiological studies

Samples of mycelia (~1 mm diameter) from each culture slant were subcultured on fresh potato dextrose agar plates and incubated at various temperatures (30 °C, 35 °C or 37 °C) for 21 days. Colony diameters were measured after 7, 14 and 21 days of incubation. Assimilation of carbon sources, including sucrose and raffinose, was examined according to previously described methods.[18] All isolates were assayed in 96-well microplates, and each plate contained positive controls with glucose and negative controls with no carbon source. Conidial viability in the presence of the different carbon sources was determined following incubation for 5 days at 25 °C.

DNA extraction and sequencing

Total genomic DNA of all isolates was extracted using an alkaline lysis extraction method.[19, 20] Briefly, fungal pellets were resuspended sequentially in Solution I (0.9% w/v glucose, 25 mmol/L Tris, 6 mmol/L ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, pH 8.0) and Solution II (1% SDS, 0.2 mol/L sodium hydroxide), followed by precipitation with Solution III (12% sodium acetate, 12% acetic acid). The supernatant was collected and successively treated with phenol:chloroform:isoamyl alcohol (25:24:1) and chloroform:isoamyl alcohol (24:1). Nucleic acids were precipitated with ice-cold isoamyl alcohol at −20 °C. DNA pellets were washed with 70% ethanol, dissolved in 40 μL of ddH2O, and stored at −20 °C until use. All DNA samples were quantified using an ultraviolet spectrophotometer, and then the quality was checked using 0.8% (w/v) agarose gel electrophoresis. To confirm that an isolate was S. globosa, we performed a PCR assay to amplify the S. globosa CAL gene using the previously reported primers CL1 (5′-GA(GA)T(AT)CAAGGAGGCCTTCTC-3′) and CL2A (5′-TTT TTG CAT CAT GAG TTG GAC-3′).[21] The thermocycling conditions included an initial denaturation at 94 °C for 1 min, followed by 35 cycles of 94 °C for 30 s, 60 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 1 min, and a final extension of 72 °C for 5 min. The PCR products were examined by electrophoresis in 0.8% (w/v) agarose gels. In addition, all products were purified and subjected to Sanger sequencing by Sangon Biotech (Shanghai, China).

AFLP analysis

The AFLP procedure was carried out essentially as described by Vos et al.[22] with some modifications. All primers and adapters[22] were synthesized by Sangon Biotech. Briefly, 1 μg of genomic DNA was digested with FastDigest EcoRI (1 μL) and FastDigest SaqAI (1 μL; an isoschizomer of MseI) in a 20- μL reaction mixture at 37 °C for 5 min. The digested products were then ligated to their respective adapters (EcoRI adapter, 5′-CTCGTAGACTGCGTACC-3′ SaqAI adapter, 5′-GACGATGAGTCCTGAG-3′) using T4 DNA Ligase (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) at 25 °C for 1 h. The quality and quantity of the digested and ligated products were examined by agarose gel electrophoresis. Preamplification was performed in a total volume of 20 μL, containing 5 μL of diluted (1:20) ligation products, 2 mM magnesium chloride, 0.2 mM of each dNTP, 2 μL of 10 × PCR buffer, 1 U Taq DNA polymerase (Takara, Otsu, Japan), and 1 μL of each primer (EcoRI-A, 5′-GTA GAC TGC GTA CCA ATT CA-3′ SaqAI-C, 5′-GAC GAT GAG TCC TGA GTA AC-3′ 10 μM). The thermocycling conditions were: 94 °C for 2 min, followed by 25 cycles of 94 °C for 30 s, 56 °C for 1 min, and 72 °C for 1 min, and a final extension of 72 °C for 10 min. Selective amplification was carried out in a 20- μL reaction volume consisting of 5 μL of diluted (1:20) preamplification products, 1 mM magnesium chloride, 0.15 mM of each dNTP, 2 μL of 10 × PCR buffer, 1.5 U Taq DNA polymerase (Takara), and 0.6 μL of each primer (EcoRI-ACT, 5′-GAC TGC GTA CCA ATT CAC T-3′ SaqAI-CAA, 5′-GAT GAG TCC TGA GTA ACA A-3′ 10 μM). The thermocycling conditions were as follows: 94 °C for 4 min, followed by 12 cycles of 94 °C for 30 s, 65 °C (with a 0.7 °C decrease per cycle) for 1 min, and 72 °C for 1 min, and then 23 cycles of 94 °C for 30 s, 56 °C for 1 min, and 72 °C for 1 min. The products of the selective amplification were separated by 6% (w/v) denaturing polyacrylamide gel in 1 × TBE buffer for ~1.5 h at 50 W. Following staining with 2% (w/v) silver nitrate, the gels were scanned with a Bio-Rad gel imaging system (Hercules, CA, USA), and the DNA bands were manually scored as present (1) or absent (0) and compiled into a binary matrix. The raw data were analyzed using the unweighted pair-group method with arithmetic average and the Dice coefficient, as implemented in NTSYS-pc version 2.10 (Exeter Software Co., Setauket, NY, USA).

Antifungal agents and antifungal susceptibility testing

We assessed the susceptibility of 43 of the S. globosa isolates (Table 1), which represented each of the different AFLP genotypes, to eight antifungal agents, including amphotericin B (AMB; Bio Basic Inc., Markham, ON, Canada), terbinafine (TRB), itraconazole (ICZ), fluconazole (FCZ), voriconazole (VCZ), posaconazole (POS), albaconazole (ALB) and caspofungin (CAS). TRB, ICZ, FCZ and VCZ were purchased from Tokyo Chemical Industry, Tokyo, Japan. POS, ALB, and CAS were purchased from Toronto Research Chemicals, Toronto, ON, Canada. All susceptibility assays were carried out in RPMI 1640 medium buffered to pH 7 with 0.165 mol/L morpholinepropanesulfonic acid (MOPS). The S. globosa isolates were cultured in microplates, which were prepared as described by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (standard M38-A2).[23] Final drug concentrations ranged from 0.125–64 μg/mL for FCZ, and from 0.03–16 μg/mL for the other drugs. Each inoculum was prepared by adding 5 mL of sterile saline to the agar plate and then removing the colony surface by gentle scraping. The resulting suspensions were diluted, and the numbers of conidia in the suspensions were adjusted to twice the desired final concentration ((1–5) × 104 colony-forming units/mL). The microplates were incubated at 30 °C and read after 72 h. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) were determined as per the guidelines of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (standard M38-A2).[23] Candida parapsilosis ATCC 22019 and Candida krusei ATCC 6258 were used as quality control strains in the antifungal susceptibility testing assays.

Statistical analysis

Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Dunnett’s T3 Test were used to evaluate the differences in the growth rates, colony sizes, and MIC values of isolates grown under different conditions, and the relationship between clinical manifestation and colony size. The chi-square test and Fisher’s exact test were used to evaluate the relationships between AFLP profiles and the geographic origin, sex and age of patients, clinical manifestation, and year of identification. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software version 21 (IBM SPSS Statistics, Somers, NY, USA). A value of P<0.05 was considered statistically significant. The reliability of AFLP clustering analysis was evaluated using a high cophenetic correlation coefficient after 1000 permutations (r=0.772).

RESULTS

Morphological and physiological analyses

All isolates demonstrated good growth by 21 days of cultivation on potato dextrose agar at 30 °C and 35 °C. All isolates initially produced cream-colored colonies, some of which gradually deepened in color to brown or black. Most colonies were oval or round in shape, with a wrinkled surface and a milky membranous edge. The colony diameters were 16–42 mm at 30 °C and 3–15 mm at 35 °C. When the culture temperature was increased to 37 °C, most isolates showed very limited growth, with colony sizes ranging from 1.5–5.5 mm in diameter. Seven isolates showed no growth at this temperature (FHJU12030101, FHJU12010502, FHJU12010402, FHJU11050201, FHJU12062301, FHJU11102601 and CCMC1). All growth data are summarized in Table 2. ANOVA and Dunnett’s T3 Test results showed that the average colony size of AFLP group IV isolates was significantly different from those of group I and group II isolates, while no significant difference in the average colony size was observed between any other AFLP groups. There were no significant differences (P>0.05) in the average colony size between isolates grown at different temperatures or between isolates obtained from patients with different clinical forms of sporotrichosis. All isolates assimilated glucose and sucrose, but none could assimilate raffinose.
Table 2

Morphological characteristics and AFLP genotypes of Sporothrix globosa isolates in China

Group by AFLPNumber of isolatesMean colony diameter (mm)±SDGrowth rate (mm/week)±SD
  30 °C35 °C37 °C30 °C35 °C37 °C
I5229.89±5.02a6.48±2.16a3.12±1.17a9.96±1.67a2.16±0.27a1.04±0.39a
II9331.86±5.02a8.58±2.20b2.54±0.63b10.62±1.67a2.86±0.73b0.85±0.21b
III232.00±2.83a,b9.50±0.71a,b4.95±0.07c10.67±0.94a,b3.17±0.24a,b1.65±0.02c
IV4934.53±3.25b9.21±2.34b2.56±0.72a,b11.51±1.08b3.07±0.78b0.85±0.24a,b
V1232.73±6.04a,b9.67±3.22b3.20±1.15a,b10.91±2.01a,b3.22±1.07b1.07±0.38a,b
VI234.25±1.06a,b8.25±2.47a,b2.40±0.28a,b,c11.42±0.35a,b2.75±0.82a,b0.80±0.09a,b,c
VII333.83±5.80a,b10.3±0.58a,b3.23±0.84a,b,c11.28±1.93a,b3.44±0.19a,b1.08±0.28a,b,c
VIII325.83±3.75a,b6.17±0.29a,b2.97±0.35a,b8.61±1.25a,b2.06±0.10a,b0.99±0.12a,b
total21631.9±4.978.26±2.492.76±0.9010.67±1.662.75±0.830.92±0.30

α=0.05; a, b, c=Groups; Nine isolates were excluded since they were not clustered into the AFLP groups.

Sequencing of the S. globosa CAL gene

High-quality DNA (OD260/OD280 ratio values of 1.8–2.0) was extracted from all isolates, and the CAL gene was successfully amplified in all cases. The resulting ~770 bp amplicons were sequenced and subjected to BLAST analysis against the GenBank database. All sequences showed 99%–100% nucleotide sequence identity to CAL from S. globosa type strain CBS 120340, confirming that all isolates were S. globosa. The sequences generated in this study have been deposited in GenBank under the accession numbers shown in Table 1.

AFLP profile and correlation analysis

The AFLP profiles of the 225 S. globosa isolates and four reference strains are shown in Figure 2. A total of eight main clustering groups (designated I–VIII) were identified at a cophenetic correlation coefficient of 0.55. Nine isolates (FHJU11122805, FHJU12021602, FHJU13032301, FHJU12031204, FHJU11030304, FHJU10121501, FHJU10042702, FHJU09030501 and FHPU5) failed to form clusters and were well separated from the eight main clustering groups. Groups I, II, and IV could each be divided into a further two or five subgroups (Figure 2). The AFLP profile similarity levels among these 229 isolates ranged from 0.20 to 0.94. Group II was the most prevalent group, accounting for 42% of all isolates, followed by group I (23%) and group IV (21%). Three Sporothrix globosa reference isolates were clustered into Group II, and the A. fumigatus control isolate deviated from all S. globosa isolates. All the remaining groups were much less prevalent (no more than 5%).
Figure 2

Clustering dendrogram of the 225 Sporothrix globosa isolates based on amplified fragment length polymorphism profiles generated using the unweighted pair-group method with arithmetic mean and the Dice coefficient. Eight major groups (designated I–VIII) were obtained at a coefficient of 0.55.

The majority of the isolates involved in this study originated from nine different regions within Jilin Province (n=196; 86%). As shown in Table 3, isolates from Changchun (n=60) belonged to AFLP groups II (35/60) and IV (25/60). The Siping isolates mainly belonged to group II (23/31), while the Baicheng isolates (n=12) and most of the isolates from Jilin City (18/19) were clustered together into group I. Groups III and VIII consisted entirely of isolates from Songyuan. A significant association was found between AFLP profiles and geographic origins within Jilin Province (χ2-test, P=0.000, Table 3).
Table 3

Distribution of Sporothrix globosa AFLP genotypes among different geographic origins in China

 Group IGroup IIGroup IIIGroup IVGroup VGroup VIGroup VIIGroup VIIITotal
 IaIbIIaIIbIIdIIe IVaIVbIVcIVd     
Jilin Province
 Changchun  27224 1744     60
 Songyuan1715 2 210      340
 Siping  518   4  11 2 31
 Jilin117          1  19
 Baicheng12              12
 Liaoyuan2 24      1 11 11
 Tonghua  5    3       8
 Baishan2          1   3
 Yanbian  1    2   1   4
Heilongjiang  1        1   2
Neimenggu  1    2       3
Beijing           3   3
Jiangsu  2    1   2   5
Sichuan  3        1   4
Chongqing  7        1   8
Guangdong  2        1   3
Total44861244423944212233216
 5293 49     
The remaining 28 isolates originated from seven other provinces or municipalities, and most (25/28, 89%) clustered into groups IIa and V. When comparing isolates from northern China (including Jilin, Heilongjiang, Neimenggu and Beijing) and southern China (including Jiangsu, Sichuan, Chongqing and Guangdong), the isolates from northern China primarily clustered in groups I, II and IV (52/196, 26.5% 79/196, 40.3% and 48/196, 24.5%, respectively), while the isolates from southern China mostly clustered in groups IIa, IVa and V (14/20, 70% 1/20, 5% and 5/20, 25%, respectively). Statistical analysis showed a significant difference in the distribution of the AFLP genotypes between northern and southern China (χ2-test, P=0.000, Table 3). We attempted to correlate the AFLP profiles with the clinical forms of sporotrichosis (Table 4) but observed no significant correlation (P=0.251). In addition, Fisher’s exact test showed no significant association between the AFLP profiles and the sex (P=0.159) or age (P=0.565) of the patients or the sampling dates (P=0.052).
Table 4

Relationship between AFLP genotypes and different clinical forms

 Group IGroup IIGroup IIIGroup IVGroup VGroup VIGroup VIIGroup VIIITotal
Clinical formsa
 F264623141 2112
 L2231 16 13174
 D41 1    6
 E 1      1

F—fixed cutaneous; L—lymphocutaneous; D—disseminated cutaneous; E—extracutaneous.

Antifungal susceptibility testing

Antifungal susceptibility testing results are presented in Table 5. Of the eight drugs tested, TRB showed the strongest anti- S. globosa activity, with MIC values ranging from 0.03 to 8 μg/mL (geometric mean, 0.05 μg/mL), followed by POS, which produced MIC values ranging from 0.5 to >16 μg/mL (geometric mean, 2.99 μg/mL). Moderate anti- S. globosa activity was observed for CAS, ALB and ICZ, with MIC values ranging from 0.25 to >16 μg/mL, 4 to 16 μg/mL, and 1 to >16 μg/mL, respectively. FCZ, VCZ and AMB showed poor activity against S. globosa.
Table 5

Susceptibility testing results in μg/mL of Sporothrix globosa isolates

Group by AFLPMICFCZICZVCZTRBAMBPOSCASALB
I (n=10)Range64–>642–>168–>160.03–8>160.5–>160.5–>164–16
 GM>6412.12>160.06>163.036.067.46
II (n=10)Range>642–>168–>160.03–0.06>161–>168–>164–16
 GM>649.19>160.03>162.14>168
III (n=2)Range>648–>1616–>160.03>161–40.25–164–16
 GM
IV (n=9)Range>642–>16>160.03–0.5>161–168–>164–16
 GM>6412.70>160.07>162>168.64
V (n=4)Range>642–>1616–>160.03–0.06>161–>161–168–16
 GM>649.51>160.04>166.724.7611.31
VI (n=2)Range>64>16>160.03–0.25>16>164–>168–16
 GM
VII (n=3)Range>6416–>1616–>160.03–0.06>161–>161–168–16
 GM>64>16>160.04>1642.5210.08
VIII (n=3)Range>641–1616–>160.03>161–81–>164–8
 GM>646.35>160.03>16285.04
Total (n=43)Range>641–>168–>160.03–8>160.5–>160.25–>164–16
 GM>6411.78>160.05>162.999.558.26

Abbreviations: amplified fragment length polymorphism, AFLP; albaconazole, ALB; amphotericin B, AMB; caspofungin, CAS; fluconazole, FCZ; genometric mean, GM; itraconazole, ICZ; minimum inhibitory concentrations, MIC; posaconazole, POS; terbinafine, TRB.

Statistical analysis showed that the observed MIC values were not associated with the AFLP genotypes, the origins of the isolates, or the clinical manifestations of the infection (ANOVA and Dunnett’s T3 Test, P>0.05, Table 5).

DISCUSSION

In the present study, we examined the growth characteristics of 225 S. globosa isolates from sporotrichosis patients originating from eight provinces or municipalities in China. Using AFLP analysis, we categorized the isolates into eight distinct clustering groups. We also examined whether there was any correlation between the AFLP profiles and the in vitro growth characteristics, antifungal susceptibility, geographic origins and clinical forms of sporotrichosis. AFLP analysis of the 225 S. globosa isolates in the current study showed that the AFLP genotypes had certain associations with the geographical origins of the isolates, especially those from Jilin Province. In particular, the isolates from Baicheng and Jilin City mostly clustered into group I, while isolates from Siping mainly clustered in group II. Isolates from Changchun were clustered into two groups: those from the central area clustered into group II, and isolates from areas near the border were identified as group IV. However, isolates from other regions, such as Songyuan and Liaoyuan, showed a great variety of genotypes. The reason for this genetic variation is unclear, but we suspect that it may be related to the frequent migration of the people in these regions. In addition, in contrast to the isolates from northern China, which were primarily clustered in groups I, II and IV, the isolates from southern China mainly clustered in groups IIa, V and IVa. While further studies are needed using a larger number of samples (especially from southern China), this observation agrees with Zhang et al.,[15] who found a significant difference in the restriction fragment length polymorphism and Southern blotting band patterns of S. globosa isolates from southern and northern China. In contrast, Zhang et al.[17] recently reported an AFLP analysis of 20 S. globosa isolates from wide geographic origins, wherein all of the isolates showed an identical AFLP pattern. The reasons for these discrepancies may include different experimental conditions or differences in the sample sizes. Different restriction endonucleases and different numbers of selective bases and primer pairs will influence the observed genetic diversity. For example, Neyra et al.[16] used the restriction endonucleases EcoRI and MseI, along with a combination of six primers, in their AFLP analysis of Peruvian strains of S. schenckii, identifying two stable populations. Zhang et al.[17] used the same restriction enzymes but only one selective primer pair to divide 122 strains of Sporothrix into 13 groups. In the present study, we chose the same restriction endonucleases and one pair of primers (out of 64 primer pairs screened) and achieved reproducible results with a relatively high number of polymorphic bands. In the current study, the AFLP genotypes appeared to be differentially distributed among different years. For example, AFLP group I accounted for the largest proportion of isolates in 2009 (8/20, 40%) and 2013 (4/8, 50%) but was absent in 2010, while group II was dominant in 2010 (18/25, 72%) but decreased in prevalence in 2011 (27/77, 35.1%) and 2012 (25/63, 39.7%). However, these differences did not reach statistical significance. Further studies are needed to confirm this observation using a larger number of isolates over a longer period of time. All of the S. globosa isolates in the current study grew well at both 30 °C and 35 °C, with 97% (218/225) of isolates showing some growth at 37 °C, although the average growth rate and colony size were decreased compared with those at the lower temperatures (Table 2). Only seven isolates could not grow at 37 °C. These observations are consistent with the report of Yu et al.[10] but contradict the report of Marimon et al.,[18] who found that S. globosa did not grow at 37 °C, with the exception of four strains that produced colonies of 2 mm in diameter. There have been conflicting reports regarding the relationship between temperature sensitivity and clinical forms of Sporothrix infection. Kwon-Chung[24] reported that isolates causing lymphocutaneous and extracutaneous sporotrichosis grew well at both 35 °C and 37 °C, whereas isolates causing fixed cutaneous sporotrichosis grew well at 35 °C but failed to grow at 37 °C. However, Yu et al.[10] found that isolates obtained from the three cutaneous forms of sporotrichosis were able to grow at 37 °C. In our study, all but seven of the 225 isolates showed growth at 37 °C. The seven isolates that did not grow included four isolates associated with lymphocutaneous sporotrichosis, two from fixed cutaneous sporotrichosis, and one (CCMC1) from an undefined form of sporotrichosis. We found no significant association between the clinical form of the disease and the AFLP genotype or growth rate of S. globosa. Hence, the clinical manifestation of sporotrichosis is most likely related to the immune status of the patient rather than the thermotolerance or AFLP genotype of the causative S. globosa strain. In the present study, we examined the drug susceptibilities of 43 S. globosa isolates representing each of the AFLP genotypes and did not detect any significant association between the in vitro antifungal drug susceptibility and the AFLP genotype. Nevertheless, our data indicated that all S. globosa isolates are highly sensitive to TRB, consistent with previous studies.[25, 26] Although only two of the examined isolates belonged to group VI, both were more sensitive to TRB than to any of the other drugs, including ICZ. Ten isolates (23%) showed resistance to POS, with MIC values of ⩾16 μg/mL. Moreover, AMB showed poor activity against all isolates, which is in contrast to previous studies.[12, 25] These findings suggest a need to determine the antifungal susceptibility of S. globosa isolates in China on a larger scale to optimize the treatment of sporotrichosis. In summary, the current AFLP analysis revealed significant genetic diversity among S. globosa isolates in China. The AFLP profiles of the isolates are associated with their geographic origins, but not with other phenotypic properties of the isolates. This study suggests that AFLP analysis is a potentially useful tool for studying the epidemiology of S. globosa. Further studies using a larger number of S. globosa isolates from patients from wider geographic origins and suffering from more diverse well-defined clinical forms of sporotrichosis are required to better understand the implications of the high degree of AFLP variation in the epidemiology of sporotrichosis.
  18 in total

1.  AFLP: a new technique for DNA fingerprinting.

Authors:  P Vos; R Hogers; M Bleeker; M Reijans; T van de Lee; M Hornes; A Frijters; J Pot; J Peleman; M Kuiper
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1995-11-11       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Comparison of isolates of Sporothrix schenckii obtained from fixed cutaneous lesions with isolates from other types of lesions.

Authors:  K J Kwon-Chung
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1979-04       Impact factor: 5.226

3.  Molecular identification of Sporothrix clinical isolates in China.

Authors:  Ting-ting Liu; Ke Zhang; Xun Zhou
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 3.066

Review 4.  Global epidemiology of sporotrichosis.

Authors:  Arunaloke Chakrabarti; Alexandro Bonifaz; Maria Clara Gutierrez-Galhardo; Takashi Mochizuki; Shanshan Li
Journal:  Med Mycol       Date:  2014-12-19       Impact factor: 4.076

Review 5.  Sporothrix schenckii and Sporotrichosis.

Authors:  Mônica Bastos de Lima Barros; Rodrigo de Almeida Paes; Armando Oliveira Schubach
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 26.132

6.  Relationships among genotypes, virulence and clinical forms of Sporothrix schenckii infection.

Authors:  X Kong; T Xiao; J Lin; Y Wang; H-D Chen
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 8.067

7.  In vitro antifungal susceptibilities of five species of sporothrix.

Authors:  Rita Marimon; Carolina Serena; Josepa Gené; Josep Cano; Josep Guarro
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2007-11-26       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Sporothrix globosa, a pathogenic fungus with widespread geographical distribution.

Authors:  Hugo Madrid; Josep Cano; Josepa Gené; Alexandro Bonifaz; Conchita Toriello; Josep Guarro
Journal:  Rev Iberoam Micol       Date:  2009-07-23       Impact factor: 1.044

9.  Molecular identification of Sporothrix species involved in the first familial outbreak of sporotrichosis in the state of Espírito Santo, southeastern Brazil.

Authors:  Manoel Marques Evangelista Oliveira; Simone Bravim Maifrede; Mariceli Araújo Ribeiro; Rosely Maria Zancope-Oliveira
Journal:  Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.743

10.  Phylogeography and evolutionary patterns in Sporothrix spanning more than 14 000 human and animal case reports.

Authors:  Y Zhang; F Hagen; B Stielow; A M Rodrigues; K Samerpitak; X Zhou; P Feng; L Yang; M Chen; S Deng; S Li; W Liao; R Li; F Li; J F Meis; J Guarro; M Teixeira; H S Al-Zahrani; Z Pires de Camargo; L Zhang; G S de Hoog
Journal:  Persoonia       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 11.051

View more
  9 in total

1.  In vitro antifungal susceptibility of Sporothrix globosa isolates from Jilin Province, northeastern China: comparison of yeast and mycelial phases.

Authors:  Yang Song; Shanshan Li; Ying Shi; Lipei Zhao; Yu Cui; Lei Yao; Yu Zhen; Ruili Chen; Yan Cui
Journal:  Braz J Microbiol       Date:  2020-06-17       Impact factor: 2.476

2.  Phenotypic and molecular characterisation of Sporothrix globosa of diverse origin from India.

Authors:  Shivaprakash M Rudramurthy; Shamanth A Shankarnarayan; Basavaraj M Hemashetter; Santwana Verma; Smriti Chauhan; Reema Nath; Jayanthi Savio; Malini Capoor; Harsimran Kaur; Anup K Ghosh; Arunaloke Chakrabarti
Journal:  Braz J Microbiol       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 2.476

3.  Genotyping of intraspecies polymorphisms of Sporothrix globosa using partial sequence of mitochondrial DNA.

Authors:  Hirokazu Mochizuki; Kazushi Anzawa; Takashi Mochizuki
Journal:  J Dermatol       Date:  2021-11-18       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 4.  Biological and Clinical Attributes of Sporothrix globosa, a Causative Agent of Sporotrichosis.

Authors:  Laura C García-Carnero; Héctor M Mora-Montes; Nallely Nava-Pérez; Lisset G Neri-García; Oscar E Romero-González; Joshua A Terrones-Cruz
Journal:  Infect Drug Resist       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 4.177

5.  Genome-wide mapping using new AFLP markers to explore intraspecific variation among pathogenic Sporothrix species.

Authors:  Jamile Ambrósio de Carvalho; Ferry Hagen; Matthew C Fisher; Zoilo Pires de Camargo; Anderson Messias Rodrigues
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2020-07-01

6.  Th2 Biased Immunity With Altered B Cell Profiles in Circulation of Patients With Sporotrichosis Caused by Sporothrix globosa.

Authors:  Jianjiao Zu; Lei Yao; Yang Song; Yan Cui; Mengqi Guan; Ruili Chen; Yu Zhen; Shanshan Li
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2020-11-13       Impact factor: 7.561

7.  Trends in the molecular epidemiology and population genetics of emerging Sporothrix species.

Authors:  J A de Carvalho; M A Beale; F Hagen; M C Fisher; R Kano; A Bonifaz; C Toriello; R Negroni; R S de M Rego; I D F Gremião; S A Pereira; Z P de Camargo; A M Rodrigues
Journal:  Stud Mycol       Date:  2021-12-17       Impact factor: 16.097

Review 8.  Trends in Molecular Diagnostics and Genotyping Tools Applied for Emerging Sporothrix Species.

Authors:  Jamile Ambrósio de Carvalho; Ruan Campos Monteiro; Ferry Hagen; Zoilo Pires de Camargo; Anderson Messias Rodrigues
Journal:  J Fungi (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-31

9.  Molecular Identification, Antifungal Susceptibility, and Geographic Origin of Clinical Strains of Sporothrix schenckii Complex in Mexico.

Authors:  Olga C Rojas; Alexandro Bonifaz; Christian Campos; Rogelio de J Treviño-Rangel; Rafael González-Álvarez; Gloria M González
Journal:  J Fungi (Basel)       Date:  2018-07-20
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.