Literature DB >> 29018176

In defence of governance: ethics review and social research.

Mark Sheehan1, Michael Dunn1, Kate Sahan1.   

Abstract

There is a growing body of literature that has sought to undermine systems of ethical regulation, and governance more generally, within the social sciences. In this paper, we argue that any general claim for a system of research ethics governance in social research depends on clarifying the nature of the stake that society has in research. We show that certain accounts of this stake-protecting researchers' freedoms; ensuring accountability for resources; safeguarding welfare; and supporting democracy-raise relevant ethical considerations that are reasonably contested. However, these accounts cannot underpin a general claim in favour of, or against, a system of research ethics governance. Instead, we defend governance in social research on the grounds that research, as an institutionalised form of enquiry, is a constitutive element of human flourishing, and that society ought to be concerned with the flourishing of its members. We conclude by considering the governance arrangements that follow from, and are justified by, our arguments. © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ethics governance; research ethics; research ethics committees; social research

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29018176     DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2017-104443

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  3 in total

1.  Pursuing impact in research: towards an ethical approach.

Authors:  Kristine Bærøe; Angeliki Kerasidou; Michael Dunn; Inger Lise Teig
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 2.652

Review 2.  Empowering local research ethics review of antibacterial mass administration research.

Authors:  Nelson K Sewankambo; Paul Kutyabami
Journal:  Infect Dis Poverty       Date:  2022-09-28       Impact factor: 10.485

3.  Ethics review of big data research: What should stay and what should be reformed?

Authors:  Agata Ferretti; Marcello Ienca; Mark Sheehan; Alessandro Blasimme; Edward S Dove; Bobbie Farsides; Phoebe Friesen; Jeff Kahn; Walter Karlen; Peter Kleist; S Matthew Liao; Camille Nebeker; Gabrielle Samuel; Mahsa Shabani; Minerva Rivas Velarde; Effy Vayena
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 2.652

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.