Literature DB >> 29017916

Conflict detection and resolution rely on a combination of common and distinct cognitive control networks.

Qi Li1, Guochun Yang1, Zhenghan Li1, Yanyan Qi1, Michael W Cole2, Xun Liu3.   

Abstract

Cognitive control can be activated by stimulus-stimulus (S-S) and stimulus-response (S-R) conflicts. However, whether cognitive control is domain-general or domain-specific remains unclear. To deepen the understanding of the functional organization of cognitive control networks, we conducted activation likelihood estimation (ALE) from 111 neuroimaging studies to examine brain activation in conflict-related tasks. We observed that fronto-parietal and cingulo-opercular networks were commonly engaged by S-S and S-R conflicts, showing a domain-general pattern. In addition, S-S conflicts specifically activated distinct brain regions to a greater degree. These regions were implicated in the processing of the semantic-relevant attribute, including the inferior frontal cortex (IFC), superior parietal cortex (SPC), superior occipital cortex (SOC), and right anterior cingulate cortex (ACC). By contrast, S-R conflicts specifically activated the left thalamus, middle frontal cortex (MFC), and right SPC, which were associated with detecting response conflict and orienting spatial attention. These findings suggest that conflict detection and resolution involve a combination of domain-general and domain-specific cognitive control mechanisms.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anterior cingulate cortex; Cognitive control; Dimensional overlap; Domain-general; Domain-specific; Dorso lateral prefrontal cortex; Insula; Meta-analysis; fMRI

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29017916     DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.09.032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev        ISSN: 0149-7634            Impact factor:   8.989


  11 in total

1.  How to study the neural mechanisms of multiple tasks.

Authors:  Guangyu Robert Yang; Michael W Cole; Kanaka Rajan
Journal:  Curr Opin Behav Sci       Date:  2019-09-09

2.  Dispositional negativity, cognition, and anxiety disorders: An integrative translational neuroscience framework.

Authors:  Juyoen Hur; Melissa D Stockbridge; Andrew S Fox; Alexander J Shackman
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2019-04-17       Impact factor: 2.453

Review 3.  A Lifespan Model of Interference Resolution and Inhibitory Control: Risk for Depression and Changes with Illness Progression.

Authors:  Katie L Bessette; Aimee J Karstens; Natania A Crane; Amy T Peters; Jonathan P Stange; Kathleen H Elverman; Sarah Shizuko Morimoto; Sara L Weisenbach; Scott A Langenecker
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2020-01-15       Impact factor: 7.444

4.  Task-based fMRI predicts response and remission to exposure therapy in obsessive-compulsive disorder.

Authors:  David Pagliaccio; Rachel Middleton; Dianne Hezel; Shari Steinman; Ivar Snorrason; Marina Gershkovich; Raphael Campeas; Anthony Pinto; Page Van Meter; H Blair Simpson; Rachel Marsh
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-09-23       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Target Amplification and Distractor Inhibition: Theta Oscillatory Dynamics of Selective Attention in a Flanker Task.

Authors:  Céline C Haciahmet; Christian Frings; Bernhard Pastötter
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 3.282

6.  Consistency and strength of grapheme-color associations are separable aspects of synesthetic experience.

Authors:  Simon Lacey; Margaret Martinez; Nicole Steiner; Lynne C Nygaard; K Sathian
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  2021-04-29

7.  Static magnetic field stimulation of the supplementary motor area modulates resting-state activity and motor behavior.

Authors:  José A Pineda-Pardo; Ignacio Obeso; Pasqualina Guida; Michele Dileone; Bryan A Strange; José A Obeso; Antonio Oliviero; Guglielmo Foffani
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2019-10-31

8.  Control of response interference: caudate nucleus contributes to selective inhibition.

Authors:  Claudia C Schmidt; David C Timpert; Isabel Arend; Simone Vossel; Gereon R Fink; Avishai Henik; Peter H Weiss
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Intact Stimulus-Response Conflict Processing in ADHD-Multilevel Evidence and Theoretical Implications.

Authors:  Annet Bluschke; Moritz Mückschel; Veit Roessner; Christian Beste
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-01-15       Impact factor: 4.241

10.  Cortical activation abnormalities in bipolar and schizophrenia patients in a combined oddball-incongruence paradigm.

Authors:  Lisa Rauer; Sarah Trost; Aleksandra Petrovic; Oliver Gruber
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2020-07-24       Impact factor: 5.270

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.