Literature DB >> 29017861

Propensity score-matched analysis of the endoscopic bilateral axillo-breast approach (BABA) versus conventional open thyroidectomy in patients with benign or intermediate fine-needle aspiration cytology results, a retrospective study.

Mansoor Alramadhan1, Jun Ho Choe2, Jun Ho Lee3, Jung Han Kim4, Jee Soo Kim4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare the surgical outcomes of endoscopic bilateral axillo-breast approach (BABA) to conventional open thyroidectomy (COT) in patients who had thyroid nodule(s) with a benign or intermediate fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) results.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients with benign or intermediate thyroid nodule(s) who underwent BABA (n = 95) or COT (n = 262) between 2008 and 2015 were reviewed. Then, 1:1 propensity score matching was performed, and 66 matched pairs were obtained. Surgical outcomes were then compared.
RESULTS: Before matching, patients in the BABA group were significantly younger (36.5 vs. 50.7 years, p < 0.000), predominantly female (97.9% vs. 69.8%, p < 0.000), had smaller tumours (2.1 vs. 2.8 cm, p = 0.002) and more commonly underwent hemithyroidectomy (88.4% vs. 70.6%, p < 0.000) than those in the COT group. After matching, all clinicopathological characteristics were equivalent. BABA was found to be significantly associated with longer operative time (125.3 vs. 79.8 min, p < 0.000), greater drainage volume (132.9 vs. 59.1 ml, p < 0.000), longer postoperative hospital stay (3.1 vs. 2.2 days, p < 0.000), and higher average total medical expense (4000 vs. 3200 US$). However, the incidence of complications did not differ between the groups.
CONCLUSION: BABA is comparable to COT in terms of complications and is safe and feasible when performed by experienced surgeons and for carefully selected patients who are concerned about neck scarring. However, the operative time and postoperative hospital stay are significantly longer, which may increase medical expenses.
Copyright © 2017. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BABA endoscopic thyroidectomy; Bilateral axillo-breast approach; Endoscopic thyroidectomy; Thyroidectomy

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29017861     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.09.077

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Surg        ISSN: 1743-9159            Impact factor:   6.071


  5 in total

1.  Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Thyroid Surgery - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Lisa H de Vries; Dilay Aykan; Lutske Lodewijk; Johanna A A Damen; Inne H M Borel Rinkes; Menno R Vriens
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-08-12       Impact factor: 5.555

2.  Thyroidectomy Using the Lateral Cervical Small Incision Approach for Early Thyroid Cancer.

Authors:  Xi-Xin Jin; Qian-Yu Zhang; Chao Gao; Wen-Xin Wei; Chong Jiao; Li Li; Bin-Lin Ma; Chao Dong
Journal:  Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol       Date:  2022-04-20

3.  Modified equipment for facilitating the transoral vestibular approach to endoscopic thyroidectomy.

Authors:  Piyapong Bamroong; Pornthep Kasemsiri; Cattleya Thongrong; Kanokkarn Mahawerawat; Siriwan Tongwiset; Angkana Rachain; Sirikarn Khaengraeng
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2020 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 1.407

4.  Changing paradigms in endoscopic thyroid surgery: A comparison between scarless-in-the-neck axillo-breast approach and totally scarless transoral approach.

Authors:  Gyan Chand; Nitish Gupta; Goonj Johri; Anjali Mishra; Saroj Kant Mishra
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2021 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 1.407

5.  Quality of life and surgical outcome of ABBA versus EndoCATS endoscopic thyroid surgery: a single center experience.

Authors:  Ulrich Wirth; Thomas von Ahnen; Josef Hampel; Josefine Schardey; Peter Busch; Hans Martin Schardey; Stefan Schopf
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 4.584

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.