BACKGROUND: Automated mobile phone messaging has not been reported in total joint arthroplasty (TJA). Our purpose was to compare Press Ganey (PG) and Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) scores between TJA patients who did and did not receive perioperative automated mobile phone messages. METHODS: Patients were prospectively enrolled and received messages for 1 week prior until 2 weeks after TJA. Message content included reminders, activity, and pain control. Patients answered select PG/HCAHPS and questions regarding their experience with the automated communication platform. Average PG/HCAHPS scores were compared to historical TJA patients in the 3-year window prior (control group) with significance P < .05. RESULTS: Thirty-seven consecutive patients were approached and 92% (n = 34) were enrolled. The experimental group was 47% male, with 80% patients between 51 and 75 years. The experimental (n = 30) and control groups (n = 26) were similar. Patients receiving messages were more likely to have a good understanding of health responsibilities (P = .024) and feel that the care team demonstrated shared decision-making (P = .024). Of patients enrolled, 87% felt messages helped them be more prepared for surgery, 100% felt messages kept them better informed, and 97% would participate again. CONCLUSION: TJA patients who received perioperative communication via automated mobile phone messaging had improved patient satisfaction scores postoperatively. Patients perceived this form of communication was useful and kept them better informed. Automated mobile phone messaging can be an easily integrated, helpful adjunct to surgeons, healthcare systems, and case managers to more effectively communicate with patients undergoing TJA in this era of value-based care.
BACKGROUND: Automated mobile phone messaging has not been reported in total joint arthroplasty (TJA). Our purpose was to compare Press Ganey (PG) and Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) scores between TJA patients who did and did not receive perioperative automated mobile phone messages. METHODS:Patients were prospectively enrolled and received messages for 1 week prior until 2 weeks after TJA. Message content included reminders, activity, and pain control. Patients answered select PG/HCAHPS and questions regarding their experience with the automated communication platform. Average PG/HCAHPS scores were compared to historical TJA patients in the 3-year window prior (control group) with significance P < .05. RESULTS: Thirty-seven consecutive patients were approached and 92% (n = 34) were enrolled. The experimental group was 47% male, with 80% patients between 51 and 75 years. The experimental (n = 30) and control groups (n = 26) were similar. Patients receiving messages were more likely to have a good understanding of health responsibilities (P = .024) and feel that the care team demonstrated shared decision-making (P = .024). Of patients enrolled, 87% felt messages helped them be more prepared for surgery, 100% felt messages kept them better informed, and 97% would participate again. CONCLUSION: TJA patients who received perioperative communication via automated mobile phone messaging had improved patient satisfaction scores postoperatively. Patients perceived this form of communication was useful and kept them better informed. Automated mobile phone messaging can be an easily integrated, helpful adjunct to surgeons, healthcare systems, and case managers to more effectively communicate with patients undergoing TJA in this era of value-based care.
Authors: Christopher N Carender; Christopher A Anthony; Edward O Rojas; Nicolas O Noiseux; Nicholas A Bedard; Timothy S Brown Journal: Iowa Orthop J Date: 2022-06
Authors: Chris A Anthony; John E Femino; Aaron C Miller; Linnea A Polgreen; Edward O Rojas; Shelby L Francis; Alberto M Segre; Philip M Polgreen Journal: Iowa Orthop J Date: 2020
Authors: Lindsay S Howe; Daniel Wigmore; Nathaniel Nelms; Patrick Schottel; Craig Bartlett; David Halsey; Martin Krag; David Lunardini; Robert Monsey; Bruce Beynnon; Michael Blankstein Journal: J Patient Cent Res Rev Date: 2021-04-19
Authors: Ryan G Rogero; Meghan Bishop; Brandon J Erickson; Daniel Seigerman; Daniel Smith; Samir C Sodha; Howard Yeon; Justin Tsai Journal: Cureus Date: 2020-04-17
Authors: Chris A Anthony; Edward Octavio Rojas; Valerie Keffala; Natalie Ann Glass; Apurva S Shah; Benjamin J Miller; Matthew Hogue; Michael C Willey; Matthew Karam; John Lawrence Marsh Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2020-07-29 Impact factor: 5.428