| Literature DB >> 29017470 |
Fikreslasie Samuel1, Asalif Demsew2, Yonas Alem2, Yonas Hailesilassie2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Soil-transmitted helminths (STHs) are widespread in underdeveloped countries. In Ethiopia, the prevalence and distribution of helminth infection varies by different exposing risk factors. We therefore investigated the prevalence of and risk factors of STHs infection in school children living in Ambo town, west Shoa Ethiopia.Entities:
Keywords: Ethiopia; Risk factors; School children; Soil transmitted Helminthiasis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29017470 PMCID: PMC5634961 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-017-4809-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Public Health ISSN: 1471-2458 Impact factor: 3.295
Fig. 1Trial diagram: soil transmitted helminthiasis and associated risk factors among elementary school children in ambo town, western Ethiopia, 2015
Fig. 2Prevalence of intestinal helminths among school children in Ambo town, western Ethiopia, 2015
Prevalence of intestinal helminths infection among primary schools in Ambo town, 2015
| Type of parasitic infections | Helminths infection among schools | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liben mecha No (%) | Oddo liben No (%) | Senkele No (%) | Feature generation No (%) | Kidanemihret No (%) | Adventist No (%) | |
|
| 4 (2.86%) | 3 (8.57%) | 0 (.0%) | 0 (.0%) | 0 (.0%) | 0 (.0%) |
|
| 8 (5.71%) | 0 (.0%) | 0 (.0%) | 0 (.0%) | 1 (2.56%) | 0 (.0%) |
|
| 11 (7.86%) | 10 (28.6%) | 1(2.1%) | 3 (6.98%) | 0 (.0%) | 0 (.0%) |
| Hookworms | 1 (0.71%) | 1 (2.86%) | 7 (14.6%) | 0 (.0%) | 0 (.0%) | 0 (.0%) |
|
| 2 (1.43%) | 0 (.0%) | 0 (.0%) | 0 (.0%) | 1 (2.56%) | 0 (.0%) |
| Double infection with | 0 (.0%) | 2 (5.71%) | 0 (.0%) | 0 (.0%) | 0 (.0%) | 0 (.0%) |
| Double infection with | 1 (0.71%) | 0 (.0%) | 0 (.0%) | 0 (.0%) | 1 (2.56%) | 0 (.0%) |
| Triple with | 1 (0.71%) | 1 (2.86%) | 0 (.0%) | 0 (.0%) | 0 (.0%) | 0 (.0%) |
No. = number of positive cases
Association between demographic factors and the prevalence of STHs in Ambo town, western Ethiopia, 2015
| Socio-demographic factors | STHs infection status | Total | X2 | P-value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Negative | Positive | |||||
| Age | 6–10 | 156 (81.7%) | 35 (18.3%) | 191 (100.0%) | 0.49 | 0.12 |
| 11–15 | 102 (81.0%) | 24 (19.0%) | 126 (100.0%) | |||
| Gender | Girl | 145 (78.4%) | 40 (21.6%) | 185 (100.0%) | 0.068 | 0.031 |
| Boy | 113 (85.6%) | 19 (14.4%) | 132 (100.0%) | |||
| Family size | 1 parent and child | 4 (80.0%) | 1 (20.0%) | 5 (100.0%) | 0.03 | 0.0 |
| 1 parent and 2 children | 15 (88.2%) | 2 (11.8%) | 17 (100.0%) | |||
| 2 parents and 2 children | 40 (88.9%) | 5 (11.1%) | 45 (100.0%) | |||
| 2 parents & > 2 children | 193 (79.4%) | 50 (20.6%) | 243 (100.0%) | |||
| Latrine available | Yes | 216((83.7%) | 42 (16.3%) | 258 (100.0%) | 0.09 | 0.05 |
| No | 36 (67.9%) | 17 (32.1%) | 53 (100.0%) | |||
| Type of latrine | Ventilated improved | 50 (92.6%) | 4 (7.4%) | 54 (100.0%) | 0.036 | – |
| Traditional pit latrine | 152 (79.6%) | 39 (20.4%) | 191 (100.0%) | |||
| Water flash | 13 (100.0%) | 0(.0%) | 13 (100.0%) | |||
| Finger nail trimming | Yes | 115 (85.8%) | 19 (14.2%) | 134 (100.0%) | .039 | .024 |
| No | 31 (72.1%) | 12 (27.9%) | 43 (100.0%) | |||