Ghady Haidar1, Nathan J Philips2, Ryan K Shields1,3,4, Daniel Snyder2, Shaoji Cheng4, Brian A Potoski1,3,5, Yohei Doi1, Binghua Hao4, Ellen G Press1, Vaughn S Cooper2, Cornelius J Clancy1,4,6, M Hong Nguyen1,3,4. 1. Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 2. Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pennsylvania. 3. Antibiotic Management Program, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pennsylvania. 4. XDR Pathogen Laboratory, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pennsylvania. 5. Department of Pharmacy and Therapeutics, University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 6. VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pennsylvania.
Abstract
Background: Data on the use of ceftolozane-tazobactam and emergence of ceftolozane-tazobactam resistance during multidrug resistant (MDR)-Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections are limited. Methods: We performed a retrospective study of 21 patients treated with ceftolozane-tazobactam for MDR-P. aeruginosa infections. Whole genome sequencing and quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction were performed on longitudinal isolates. Results: Median age was 58 years; 9 patients (43%) were transplant recipients. Median simplified acute physiology score-II (SAPS-II) was 26. Eighteen (86%) patients were treated for respiratory tract infections; others were treated for bloodstream, complicated intraabdominal infections, or complicated urinary tract infections. Ceftolozane-tazobactam was discontinued in 1 patient (rash). Thirty-day all-cause and attributable mortality rates were 10% (2/21) and 5% (1/21), respectively; corresponding 90-day mortality rates were 48% (10/21) and 19% (4/21). The ceftolozane-tazobactam failure rate was 29% (6/21). SAPS-II score was the sole predictor of failure. Ceftolozane-tazobactam resistance emerged in 3 (14%) patients. Resistance was associated with de novo mutations, rather than acquisition of resistant nosocomial isolates. ampC overexpression and mutations were identified as potential resistance determinants. Conclusions: In this small study, ceftolozane-tazobactam was successful in treating 71% of patients with MDR-P. aeruginosa infections, most of whom had pneumonia. The emergence of ceftolozane-tazobactam resistance in 3 patients is worrisome and may be mediated in part by AmpC-related mechanisms. More research on treatment responses and resistance during various types of MDR-P. aeruginosa infections is needed to define ceftolozane-tazobactam's place in the armamentarium.
Background: Data on the use of ceftolozane-tazobactam and emergence of ceftolozane-tazobactam resistance during multidrug resistant (MDR)-Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections are limited. Methods: We performed a retrospective study of 21 patients treated with ceftolozane-tazobactam for MDR-P. aeruginosa infections. Whole genome sequencing and quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction were performed on longitudinal isolates. Results: Median age was 58 years; 9 patients (43%) were transplant recipients. Median simplified acute physiology score-II (SAPS-II) was 26. Eighteen (86%) patients were treated for respiratory tract infections; others were treated for bloodstream, complicated intraabdominal infections, or complicated urinary tract infections. Ceftolozane-tazobactam was discontinued in 1 patient (rash). Thirty-day all-cause and attributable mortality rates were 10% (2/21) and 5% (1/21), respectively; corresponding 90-day mortality rates were 48% (10/21) and 19% (4/21). The ceftolozane-tazobactam failure rate was 29% (6/21). SAPS-II score was the sole predictor of failure. Ceftolozane-tazobactam resistance emerged in 3 (14%) patients. Resistance was associated with de novo mutations, rather than acquisition of resistant nosocomial isolates. ampC overexpression and mutations were identified as potential resistance determinants. Conclusions: In this small study, ceftolozane-tazobactam was successful in treating 71% of patients with MDR-P. aeruginosa infections, most of whom had pneumonia. The emergence of ceftolozane-tazobactam resistance in 3 patients is worrisome and may be mediated in part by AmpC-related mechanisms. More research on treatment responses and resistance during various types of MDR-P. aeruginosa infections is needed to define ceftolozane-tazobactam's place in the armamentarium.
Authors: Krisztina M Papp-Wallace; Andrew R Mack; Magdalena A Taracila; Robert A Bonomo Journal: Infect Dis Clin North Am Date: 2020-09-30 Impact factor: 5.982
Authors: Shawn H MacVane; Ruchi Pandey; Lisa L Steed; Barry N Kreiswirth; Liang Chen Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2017-11-22 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Pablo A Fraile-Ribot; Laura Zamorano; Rocío Orellana; Ester Del Barrio-Tofiño; Irina Sánchez-Diener; Sara Cortes-Lara; Carla López-Causapé; Gabriel Cabot; Germán Bou; Luis Martínez-Martínez; Antonio Oliver Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2020-01-27 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Pablo A Fraile-Ribot; Cristóbal Del Rosario-Quintana; Carla López-Causapé; María A Gomis-Font; Mar Ojeda-Vargas; Antonio Oliver Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2019-12-20 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Helio S Sader; Cecilia G Carvalhaes; Leonard R Duncan; Dee Shortridge Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2020-04-21 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Ryan K Shields; Cornelius J Clancy; A William Pasculle; Ellen G Press; Ghady Haidar; Binghua Hao; Liang Chen; Barry N Kreiswirth; M Hong Nguyen Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2018-01-24 Impact factor: 5.948