Background: Oncogenic activation of phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase (PI3K) signaling plays a pivotal role in the development of glioblastoma (GBM). However, pharmacological inhibition of PI3K has so far not been therapeutically successful due to adaptive resistance through a rapid rewiring of cancer cell signaling. Here we identified that WEE1 is activated after transient exposure to PI3K inhibition and confers resistance to PI3K inhibition in GBM. Methods: Patient-derived glioma-initiating cells and established GBM cells were treated with PI3K inhibitor or WEE1 inhibitor alone or in combination, and cell proliferation was evaluated by CellTiter-Blue assay. Cell apoptosis was analyzed by TUNEL, annexin V staining, and blotting of cleaved caspase-3 and cleaved poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase. Both subcutaneous xenograft and orthotropic xenograft studies were conducted to evaluate the effects of the combination on tumorigenesis; the tumor growth was monitored by bioluminescence imaging, and tumor tissue was analyzed by immunohistochemistry to validate signaling changes. Results: PI3K inhibition activates WEE1 kinase, which in turn phosphorylates cell division control protein 2 homolog (Cdc2) at Tyr15 and inhibits Cdc2 activity, leading to G2/M arrest in a p53-independent manner. WEE1 inhibition abrogated the G2/M arrest and propelled cells to prematurely enter into mitosis and consequent cell death through mitotic catastrophe and apoptosis. Additionally, combination treatment significantly suppressed tumor growth in a subcutaneous model but not in an intracranial model due to limited blood-brain barrier penetration. Conclusions: Our findings highlight WEE1 as an adaptive resistant gene activated after PI3K inhibition, and inhibition of WEE1 potentiated the effectiveness of PI3K targeted inhibition, suggesting that a combinational inhibition of WEE1 and PI3K might allow successful targeted therapy in GBM.
Background: Oncogenic activation of phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase (PI3K) signaling plays a pivotal role in the development of glioblastoma (GBM). However, pharmacological inhibition of PI3K has so far not been therapeutically successful due to adaptive resistance through a rapid rewiring of cancer cell signaling. Here we identified that WEE1 is activated after transient exposure to PI3K inhibition and confers resistance to PI3K inhibition in GBM. Methods:Patient-derived glioma-initiating cells and established GBM cells were treated with PI3K inhibitor or WEE1 inhibitor alone or in combination, and cell proliferation was evaluated by CellTiter-Blue assay. Cell apoptosis was analyzed by TUNEL, annexin V staining, and blotting of cleaved caspase-3 and cleaved poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase. Both subcutaneous xenograft and orthotropic xenograft studies were conducted to evaluate the effects of the combination on tumorigenesis; the tumor growth was monitored by bioluminescence imaging, and tumor tissue was analyzed by immunohistochemistry to validate signaling changes. Results: PI3K inhibition activates WEE1 kinase, which in turn phosphorylates cell division control protein 2 homolog (Cdc2) at Tyr15 and inhibits Cdc2 activity, leading to G2/M arrest in a p53-independent manner. WEE1 inhibition abrogated the G2/M arrest and propelled cells to prematurely enter into mitosis and consequent cell death through mitotic catastrophe and apoptosis. Additionally, combination treatment significantly suppressed tumor growth in a subcutaneous model but not in an intracranial model due to limited blood-brain barrier penetration. Conclusions: Our findings highlight WEE1 as an adaptive resistant gene activated after PI3K inhibition, and inhibition of WEE1 potentiated the effectiveness of PI3K targeted inhibition, suggesting that a combinational inhibition of WEE1 and PI3K might allow successful targeted therapy in GBM.
Authors: Philip C De Witt Hamer; Shahryar E Mir; David Noske; Cornelis J F Van Noorden; Tom Würdinger Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2011-05-11 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Bhaswati Sarcar; Soumen Kahali; Antony H Prabhu; Stuart D Shumway; Yang Xu; Tim Demuth; Prakash Chinnaiyan Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2011-10-12 Impact factor: 6.261
Authors: Jenny L Pokorny; David Calligaris; Shiv K Gupta; Dennis O Iyekegbe; Dustin Mueller; Katrina K Bakken; Brett L Carlson; Mark A Schroeder; Debra L Evans; Zhenkun Lou; Paul A Decker; Jeanette E Eckel-Passow; Vincenzo Pucci; Bennett Ma; Stuart D Shumway; William F Elmquist; Nathalie Y R Agar; Jann N Sarkaria Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2015-01-21 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Mike-Andrew Westhoff; Georg Karpel-Massler; Oliver Brühl; Stefanie Enzenmüller; Katia La Ferla-Brühl; Markus D Siegelin; Lisa Nonnenmacher; Klaus-Michael Debatin Journal: Mol Cell Ther Date: 2014-10-27
Authors: Chen Zhang; Emmanuel Martinez-Ledesma; Feng Gao; Wei Zhang; Jie Ding; Shaofang Wu; Xiaolong Li; Jimin Wu; Ying Yuan; Dimpy Koul; W K Alfred Yung Journal: Am J Cancer Res Date: 2019-08-01 Impact factor: 6.166