Objectives: The goal of this study was to assess the success of the morphine microdose method in a community pain clinic setting by monitoring follow-up frequency, dose escalation, and monotherapy/polytherapy ratio. The morphine microdose method involves a pretrial reduction or elimination of systemic opioids followed by a period of abstinence. Intrathecal (IT) morphine is then started at doses of less than 0.2 mg per day. Systemic opioid abstinence is then continued after pump implant and IT morphine monotherapy. Design: Retrospective review of medical records. Setting: Private and academic pain clinic practices. Subjects: Chronic noncancer pain patients. Methods: We reviewed the charts of 60 patients who had completed a microdose regimen and had an IT pump implanted between June 11, 2008, and October 11, 2014. During IT therapy, dose change over time, pain scores, side effects, max dose, and duration were recorded. Results: The majority of patients (35/60, 58%) were successfully managed solely on morphine microdose monotherapy. These patients did not require additional oral therapy. There was a significant reduction in mean pain scores, from 7.4 ± 0.32 before microdose therapy to 4.8 ± 0.3 after microdose therapy. Conclusions: Microdose therapy achieved analgesia, improved safety, and avoided systemic side effects. The safety of IT therapy was increased by using a lower concentration (2 mg/mL) and lower daily doses (<3 mg/d) of morphine. Furthermore, microdose therapy was feasible, safe, and cost-effective in the outpatient setting.
Objectives: The goal of this study was to assess the success of the morphine microdose method in a community pain clinic setting by monitoring follow-up frequency, dose escalation, and monotherapy/polytherapy ratio. The morphine microdose method involves a pretrial reduction or elimination of systemic opioids followed by a period of abstinence. Intrathecal (IT) morphine is then started at doses of less than 0.2 mg per day. Systemic opioid abstinence is then continued after pump implant and IT morphine monotherapy. Design: Retrospective review of medical records. Setting: Private and academic pain clinic practices. Subjects: Chronic noncancer painpatients. Methods: We reviewed the charts of 60 patients who had completed a microdose regimen and had an IT pump implanted between June 11, 2008, and October 11, 2014. During IT therapy, dose change over time, pain scores, side effects, max dose, and duration were recorded. Results: The majority of patients (35/60, 58%) were successfully managed solely on morphine microdose monotherapy. These patients did not require additional oral therapy. There was a significant reduction in mean pain scores, from 7.4 ± 0.32 before microdose therapy to 4.8 ± 0.3 after microdose therapy. Conclusions: Microdose therapy achieved analgesia, improved safety, and avoided systemic side effects. The safety of IT therapy was increased by using a lower concentration (2 mg/mL) and lower daily doses (<3 mg/d) of morphine. Furthermore, microdose therapy was feasible, safe, and cost-effective in the outpatient setting.
Authors: Jeffrey W Allen; Kjersti A Horais; Nicolle A Tozier; Kirsten Wegner; Jacqueline A Corbeil; Robert F Mattrey; Steven S Rossi; Tony L Yaksh Journal: Anesthesiology Date: 2006-09 Impact factor: 7.892
Authors: Rui V Duarte; Jon H Raphael; Jane L Southall; Candice Baker; Robert L Ashford Journal: Clin Neurol Neurosurg Date: 2011-12-26 Impact factor: 1.876
Authors: Thomas J Smith; Peter S Staats; Timothy Deer; Lisa J Stearns; Richard L Rauck; Richard L Boortz-Marx; Eric Buchser; Elena Català; David A Bryce; Patrick J Coyne; George E Pool Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2002-10-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Timothy R Deer; Joshua Prager; Robert Levy; Allen Burton; Eric Buchser; David Caraway; Michael Cousins; José De Andrés; Sudhir Diwan; Michael Erdek; Eric Grigsby; Marc Huntoon; Marilyn Jacobs; Phillip Kim; Krishna Kumar; Michael Leong; Liong Liem; Gladstone McDowell; Sunil J Panchal; Richard Rauck; Michael Saulino; Peter Staats; Michael Stanton-Hicks; Lisa Stearns; B Todd Sitzman; Mark Wallace; K Dean Willis; William Witt; Tony Yaksh; Nagy Mekhail Journal: Neuromodulation Date: 2012-04-11
Authors: Timothy R Deer; Joshua Prager; Robert Levy; James Rathmell; Eric Buchser; Allen Burton; David Caraway; Michael Cousins; José De Andrés; Sudhir Diwan; Michael Erdek; Eric Grigsby; Marc Huntoon; Marilyn S Jacobs; Philip Kim; Krishna Kumar; Michael Leong; Liong Liem; Gladstone C McDowell; Sunil Panchal; Richard Rauck; Michael Saulino; B Todd Sitzman; Peter Staats; Michael Stanton-Hicks; Lisa Stearns; Mark Wallace; K Dean Willis; William Witt; Tony Yaksh; Nagy Mekhail Journal: Neuromodulation Date: 2012-07-02
Authors: Jose De Andres; Salim Hayek; Christophe Perruchoud; Melinda M Lawrence; Miguel Angel Reina; Carmen De Andres-Serrano; Ruben Rubio-Haro; Mathew Hunt; Tony L Yaksh Journal: Front Pain Res (Lausanne) Date: 2022-06-16