Literature DB >> 29016753

Clinical impact, safety, and accuracy of the remotely monitored implantable loop recorder Medtronic Reveal LINQTM.

Massimiliano Maines1, Alessandro Zorzi1, Giancarlo Tomasi1, Carlo Angheben1, Domenico Catanzariti1, Lucio Piffer1, Maurizio Del Greco1.   

Abstract

Aims: Implantable loop recorders (ILR) are indicated in a variety of clinical situations when extended cardiac rhythm monitoring is needed. We aimed to assess the clinical impact, safety, and accuracy of the new Medtronic Reveal LINQTM ILR that can be inserted outside the electrophysiology (EP) laboratory and remotely monitored. Methods and results: All 154 consecutive patients (100 males, 63 ± 15 year-old) who received the Reveal LINQTM ILR during the period July 2014-June 2016 were enrolled. The device was implanted in a procedure room and all patients where provided with the MyCareLinkTM remote monitoring system. Data were reviewed every working day via the Carelink® web system by a specialist nurse who, in case of significant events, consulted an electrophysiologist. During a mean follow-up of 12.1 (6.7-18.4) months (range 2-24 months), a diagnosis was made in 99 (64%) patients and in 60 (39%) ≥1 therapeutic interventions were established following recording of arrhythmias. In 26 of these 60 patients, remote monitoring prompted therapeutic interventions following asymptomatic arrhythmic events 3.8 months before the next theoretical scheduled in-office data download. False bradycardia detection for undersensing occurred in 44 (29%) patients and false tachycardia detection for oversensing in 4 (3%). One patient experienced skin erosion requiring explantation and none suffered from infection.
Conclusion: The remote monitoring feature of the Reveal LINQTM allowed earlier diagnosis of asymptomatic but serious arrhythmias in a significant proportion of patients. Implantation of the device outside the EP laboratory appeared safe. However, R-wave undersensing and consequent false recognition of bradyarrhythmias remains a clinically important technical issue.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29016753     DOI: 10.1093/europace/eux187

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Europace        ISSN: 1099-5129            Impact factor:   5.214


  13 in total

1.  Recommendations on the utilization of telemedicine in cardiology.

Authors:  Michael Gruska; Gerhard Aigner; Johann Altenberger; Dagmar Burkart-Küttner; Lukas Fiedler; Marianne Gwechenberger; Peter Lercher; Martin Martinek; Michael Nürnberg; Gerhard Pölzl; Gerold Porenta; Stefan Sauermann; Christoph Schukro; Daniel Scherr; Clemens Steinwender; Markus Stühlinger; Alexander Teubl
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 1.704

2.  Surveillance of Arrhythmia in Patients After Myocardial Infarction Using Wearable Electrocardiogram Patch Devices: Prospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Ju-Seung Kwun; Chang-Hwan Yoon; Sun-Hwa Kim; Ki-Hyun Jeon; Si-Hyuck Kang; Wonjae Lee; Tae-Jin Youn; In-Ho Chae
Journal:  JMIR Cardio       Date:  2022-06-09

Review 3.  [Indications for loop recorder implantation for syncope].

Authors:  Andreas Schuchert
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2018-05-02

4.  Drowning in Data: Workflow Changes Improve the Collection of Clinically Relevant and Actionable Data.

Authors:  Susan Davish; Catherine Baker; Mary Fulks; Judi Godsey; Kerri Parker
Journal:  Perspect Health Inf Manag       Date:  2019-10-01

5.  Safety of in-hospital insertable cardiac monitor procedures performed outside the traditional settings: results from the Reveal LINQ in-office 2 international study.

Authors:  Prashanthan Sanders; Christopher Piorkowski; Johannes A Kragten; Grahame K Goode; Satish R Raj; Trang Dinh; M Rizwan Sohail; Rishi Anand; Angel Moya-Mitjans; Noreli Franco; Kurt Stromberg; John D Rogers
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2019-05-31       Impact factor: 2.298

6.  Clinical evaluation of a small implantable cardiac monitor with a long sensing vector.

Authors:  Christopher Piorkowski; Mathias Busch; Georg Nölker; Jörn Schmitt; Franz Xaver Roithinger; Glenn Young; Miloš Táborský; Gundula Herrmann; Dietmar Schmitz
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2019-06-05       Impact factor: 1.976

7.  Analysis of the determining factors of detectable P-wave and amplitude of QRS complex sensed by implantable loop recorder.

Authors:  Jang Ho Ahn; Hyunho Ryu; Il-Young Oh; Youngjin Cho; Ji Hyun Lee
Journal:  J Arrhythm       Date:  2021-06-24

8.  Factors affecting signal quality in implantable cardiac monitors with long sensing vector.

Authors:  Giovanni B Forleo; Claudia Amellone; Riccardo Sacchi; Leonida Lombardi; Maria Teresa Lucciola; Valentina Scotti; Maurizio Viecca; Marco Schiavone; Daniele Giacopelli; Massimo Giammaria
Journal:  J Arrhythm       Date:  2021-06-21

Review 9.  Remote Cardiac Rhythm Monitoring in the Era of Smart Wearables: Present Assets and Future Perspectives.

Authors:  Anastasia Xintarakou; Vasileios Sousonis; Dimitrios Asvestas; Panos E Vardas; Stylianos Tzeis
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-03-01

10.  The BIOMONITOR III Injectable Cardiac Monitor: Clinical Experience with a Novel Injectable Cardiac Monitor.

Authors:  Nico Reinsch; Anna Füting; Dennis Höwel; Kars Neven
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 4.241

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.