| Literature DB >> 29016249 |
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The incidence of obesity and related metabolic diseases is high and increasing in sub-Saharan African women. Evidence on the determinants of these diseases is limited, particularly in black South African women.Entities:
Keywords: Obesity; South Africa; adiponectin; behavioural determinants; body-size perception; metabolic syndrome; women
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29016249 PMCID: PMC5645693 DOI: 10.1080/16549716.2017.1359922
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Glob Health Action ISSN: 1654-9880 Impact factor: 2.640
Figure 1.A conceptual, hypothetical framework of the proposed links between behaviours, body composition, and metabolic syndrome [13]. HDL, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol.
Multivariable linear regression models for baseline and change in anthropometry outcomes.
| Covariate | Regression coefficients ( | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMIa | WCb | WCa | Subtotal fatb | Subtotal fata | Lean massb | Lean massa | Central fata | Peripheral fata | |
| Age | – | 0.21*** | – | 0.15*** | – | 0.002 | −0.14* | – | – |
| Alcohol consumption (≥3 drinks/day) | – | – | −0.15** | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| Household SES score | – | – | – | 0.08** | – | 0.05 | – | – | – |
| Active smoker | – | – | – | – | – | −0.14* | – | – | |
| Participants who underestimated actual body size | – | – | – | – | −0.16* | – | – | – | −0.15* |
| Work MVPA (min/week) | – | – | – | – | – | 0.06* | – | – | – |
| Vigorous PA (min/week) | −0.11* | – | −0.15** | – | −0.12* | – | – | −0.15* | −0.13* |
a Change in body composition, adjusted for matching baseline body composition variable [age, socio-economic status (SES), dietary intake, alcohol consumption, smoking, and education]; b baseline body composition, adjusted for age, SES, fat mass [for the waist circumference (WC) model], sitting time, total moderate–vigorous physical activity (MVPA), work MVPA, leisure MVPA, and walking for travel. Only those independent variables significant in the bivariate analysis were included in the final models shown in this table.
–, Not included in the model; BMI, body mass index; PA, physical activity.
*p < 0.05; **p < 0.005; ***p < 0.0005.
Source of data: Gradidge et al. (2014, 2015) [10, 11].
Multivariable linear regression models for baseline metabolic variables.
| Covariate | Regression coefficients ( | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fasting glucose | Fasting insulin | HDL | LDL | Total cholesterol | Triglycerides | SBP | DBP | |
| Age | 0.10** | −0.07* | −0.05 | 0.28*** | 0.25*** | 0.08* | 0.24*** | 0.13*** |
| Sitting time (min/week) | – | – | – | – | – | 0.12*** | – | 0.08* |
| Total MVPA (min/week) | – | −0.11*** | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| WC (cm) | 0.11** | 0.35*** | −0.16*** | 0.18*** | 0.09* | – | 0.17*** | 0.21*** |
| Walking for travel (min) | – | – | – | – | −0.08* | – | – | – |
All models initially included age, socio-economic status, subtotal fat mass, lean mass, waist circumference (WC), sitting time, total moderate–vigorous physical activity (MVPA), work MVPA, leisure MVPA, and walking for travel. Only those independent variables significant in the bivariate analysis were included in the final models shown in this table.
–, Not included in the model; HDL, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure.
*p < 0.05; **p < 0.005; ***p < 0.0005.
Source of data: Gradidge et al. (2014) [10].
Figure 2.Physical activity patterns by sedentary behaviour-promoting household assets. MVPA, moderate–vigorous physical activity; TV, television. Source of data: Gradidge et al. (2014) [10]. **p < 0.005, ***p < 0.0005 vs women who do not own motor vehicles or TVs.
Figure 3.Body composition across body-size dissatisfaction groups. Source of data: Gradidge et al. (2015) [11]; ***p < 0.0005 vs women who desired to increase their body size.
Multivariable linear regression models for metabolic syndrome (MetS) and associated metabolic outcomes.
| Covariate | Odds ratio (95% confidence interval) for outcomes | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MetSa | Triglyceridesa | HDLa | Glucosea | Elevated BPa | |
| Age | 1.34 (1.04, 1.16)*** | 1.07 (1.02, 1.12)** | – | 1.09 (1.03, 1.15)** | 1.05 (1.001, 1.11)* |
| Adiponectin (µg/ml) | 0.84 (0.77, 0.92)*** | 0.92 (0.86, 0.98)*** | 0.93 (0.90, 0.97)*** | 0.93 (0.87, 1.001)* | – |
| Cigarette smoking | 3.07 (1.28, 7.33)* | 2.53 (1.21, 5.30) * | – | – | – |
| FFSTM (trunk) (kg) | 1.34 (1.10, 1.61)** | – | 1.14 (1.04, 1.24) * | – | – |
| HOMA | 1.31 (1.16, 1.48)*** | 1.11 (1.001, 1.24)* | – | 1.73 (1.49, 2.00)*** | – |
| Leg fat (kg) | – | 0.85 (0.79, 0.92)*** | – | – | – |
| Subcutaneous abdominal fat (kg) | 0.56 (0.39, 0.79)** | – | – | 0.59 (0.42, 0.83) ** | – |
The metabolic syndrome (MetS) was defined as three or more out of four components, without waist circumference [12]. The following scientifically plausible variables were included in the initial bivariate logistic regression analysis: homeostasis model assessment (HOMA), adiponectin, trunk fat-free soft-tissue mass (FFSTM), subcutaneous abdominal fat thickness, waist and hip circumference, total body fat mass, total body FFSTM, subcutaneous and visceral adipose fat thickness, menopausal status, receiving anti-retroviral medication, and smoking. The models shown here display the independent variables that remained after backward, stepwise removal of non-significant (p > 0.05) variables.
aCut-offs defined by the harmonised method [29].
– Not included in the model; BP, blood pressure; HDL, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol.
*p < 0.05; **p < 0.005; ***p < 0.0005.
Source of data: Gradidge et al. (2016) [12].