Literature DB >> 2899840

The effect of diltiazem on mortality and reinfarction after myocardial infarction.

.   

Abstract

We studied the effect of diltiazem on mortality and reinfarction in 2466 patients with previous infarction from 38 hospitals in the United States and Canada. The patients were randomly assigned to receive diltiazem (240 mg per day, n = 1234) or placebo (n = 1232) and followed for 12 to 52 months (mean, 25). Total mortality rates were nearly identical among the two treatment groups (167 and 166, respectively), as were cumulative mortality rates. There were 11 percent fewer first recurrent cardiac events (death from cardiac causes or nonfatal reinfarction) in the diltiazem group than in the placebo group (202 vs. 226; Cox hazard ratio, 0.90; 95 percent confidence limits, 0.74 and 1.08). A significant (P = 0.0042) bidirectional interaction between diltiazem and pulmonary congestion was observed on x-ray examination. In 1909 patients without pulmonary congestion, diltiazem was associated with a reduced number of cardiac events (hazard ratio, 0.77; 95 percent confidence limits, 0.61 and 0.98); in 490 patients with pulmonary congestion, diltiazem was associated with an increased number of cardiac events (hazard ratio, 1.41; 95 percent confidence limits, 1.01 and 1.96). A similar pattern was observed with respect to the ejection fraction, which was dichotomized at 0.40. Thus, diltiazem exerted no overall effect on mortality or cardiac events in this population of patients with previous infarction. This neutral effect reflected a diltiazem-related reduction in cardiac events in the majority of patients without left ventricular dysfunction and an increase in such events in the minority of patients with left ventricular dysfunction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 2899840     DOI: 10.1056/NEJM198808183190701

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  116 in total

Review 1.  Advances in the medical management of acute coronary syndromes.

Authors:  C P Cannon
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 2.  Knowledge, patterns of care, and outcomes of care for generalists and specialists.

Authors:  L R Harrold; T S Field; J H Gurwitz
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Current and Practical Management of Acute Myocardial Infarction.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 4.  Clinical case studies in heart failure management.

Authors:  R J MacFadyen; P Shiels; A D Struthers
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 5.  Drugs used in secondary prevention after myocardial infarction: case presentation.

Authors:  S Maxwell; W S Waring
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.335

6.  Non-Q-Wave Myocardial Infarction.

Authors: 
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2000-02

7.  The multicenter research group.

Authors:  Arthur J Moss; Robert E Goldstein; Henry Greenberg; Edward M Dwyer; J Thomas Bigger; Robert B Case
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 1.468

8.  Severe myocardial depression following intravenous nimodipine for aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage.

Authors:  Kandasamy Subramani; Murad Ghrew
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2004-05-28       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 9.  Usefulness of T-wave alternans in sudden death risk stratification and guiding medical therapy.

Authors:  Tuomo Nieminen; Richard L Verrier
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.468

Review 10.  Management of acute myocardial infarction in the elderly.

Authors:  D E Forman; M W Rich
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 3.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.