Literature DB >> 28994816

The Aortic Ring Co-culture Assay: A Convenient Tool to Assess the Angiogenic Potential of Mesenchymal Stromal Cells In Vitro.

Farwah Iqbal1, Yarden S Gratch2, Peter Szaraz3, Clifford L Librach4.   

Abstract

Angiogenesis is a complex, highly regulated process responsible for providing and maintaining adequate tissue perfusion. Insufficient vasculature maintenance and pathological malformations can result in severe ischemic diseases, while overly abundant vascular development is associated with cancer and inflammatory disorders. A promising form of pro-angiogenic therapy is the use of angiogenic cell sources, which can provide regulatory factors as well as physical support for newly developing vasculature. Mesenchymal Stromal Cells (MSCs) are extensively investigated candidates for vascular regeneration due to their paracrine effects and their ability to detect and home to ischemic or inflamed tissues. In particular, first trimester human umbilical cord perivascular cells (FTM HUCPVCs) are a highly promising candidate due to their pericyte-like properties, high proliferative and multilineage potential, immune-privileged properties, and robust paracrine profile. To effectively evaluate potentially angiogenic regenerative cells, it is a requisite to test them in reliable and "translatable" pre-clinical assays. The aortic ring assay is an ex vivo angiogenesis model that allows for easy quantification of tubular endothelial structures, provides accessory supportive cells and extracellular matrix (ECM) from the host, excludes inflammatory components, and is fast and inexpensive to set up. This is advantageous when compared to in vivo models (e.g., corneal assay, Matrigel plug assay); the aortic ring assay can track the administered cells and observe intercellular interactions while avoiding xeno-immune rejection. We present a protocol for a novel application of the aortic ring assay, which includes human MSCs in co-cultures with developing rat aortic endothelial networks. This assay allows for the analysis of the MSC contribution to tube formation and development through physical pericyte-like interactions and of their potency for actively migrating to sites of angiogenesis, and for evaluating their ability to perform and mediate ECM processing. This protocol provides further information on changes in MSC phenotype and gene expression following co-culture.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28994816      PMCID: PMC5752259          DOI: 10.3791/56083

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis Exp        ISSN: 1940-087X            Impact factor:   1.355


  32 in total

Review 1.  Angiogenesis assays: a critical overview.

Authors:  Robert Auerbach; Rachel Lewis; Brenda Shinners; Louis Kubai; Nasim Akhtar
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 8.327

Review 2.  Mesenchymal stem cells as trophic mediators.

Authors:  Arnold I Caplan; James E Dennis
Journal:  J Cell Biochem       Date:  2006-08-01       Impact factor: 4.429

Review 3.  The endothelial cell tube formation assay on basement membrane turns 20: state of the science and the art.

Authors:  Irina Arnaoutova; Jay George; Hynda K Kleinman; Gabriel Benton
Journal:  Angiogenesis       Date:  2009-04-28       Impact factor: 9.596

4.  All MSCs are pericytes?

Authors:  Arnold I Caplan
Journal:  Cell Stem Cell       Date:  2008-09-11       Impact factor: 24.633

Review 5.  A critical analysis of current in vitro and in vivo angiogenesis assays.

Authors:  Carolyn A Staton; Malcolm W R Reed; Nicola J Brown
Journal:  Int J Exp Pathol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.925

6.  In vitro angiogenesis: endothelial cell tube formation on gelled basement membrane extract.

Authors:  Irina Arnaoutova; Hynda K Kleinman
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2010-03-11       Impact factor: 13.491

Review 7.  Human studies of angiogenic gene therapy.

Authors:  Rajesh Gupta; Jörn Tongers; Douglas W Losordo
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2009-10-09       Impact factor: 17.367

8.  Ontogeny of human umbilical cord perivascular cells: molecular and fate potential changes during gestation.

Authors:  Seok-Ho Hong; Leila Maghen; Shlomit Kenigsberg; Anouk-Martine Teichert; Ashley W Rammeloo; Ekaterina Shlush; Peter Szaraz; Schreiber Pereira; Ayub Lulat; Rong Xiao; Shang-Mian Yie; Andrée Gauthier-Fisher; Clifford L Librach
Journal:  Stem Cells Dev       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 3.272

9.  Use of the mouse aortic ring assay to study angiogenesis.

Authors:  Marianne Baker; Stephen D Robinson; Tanguy Lechertier; Paul R Barber; Bernardo Tavora; Gabriela D'Amico; Dylan T Jones; Boris Vojnovic; Kairbaan Hodivala-Dilke
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2011-12-22       Impact factor: 13.491

10.  A review on angiogenesis and its assays.

Authors:  Zoya Tahergorabi; Majid Khazaei
Journal:  Iran J Basic Med Sci       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 2.699

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  A Challenge for Engineering Biomimetic Microvascular Models: How do we Incorporate the Physiology?

Authors:  Arinola O Lampejo; Nien-Wen Hu; Daniela Lucas; Banks M Lomel; Christian M Nguyen; Carmen C Dominguez; Bing Ren; Yong Huang; Walter L Murfee
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-06-20

2.  Antiangiogenic Activity and in Silico Cereblon Binding Analysis of Novel Thalidomide Analogs.

Authors:  Megan L Peach; Shaunna L Beedie; Cindy H Chau; Matthew K Collins; Suzana Markolovic; Weiming Luo; David Tweedie; Christian Steinebach; Nigel H Greig; Michael Gütschow; Neil Vargesson; Marc C Nicklaus; William D Figg
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-12-02       Impact factor: 4.411

Review 3.  The therapeutic potential of mesenchymal stem cells for cardiovascular diseases.

Authors:  Yajun Guo; Yunsheng Yu; Yueqiu Chen; Shijun Hu; Zhenya Shen
Journal:  Cell Death Dis       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 8.469

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.