| Literature DB >> 28994742 |
David A Geier1,2, Janet K Kern3,4,5, Mark R Geier6,7.
Abstract
Difficulties in the acquisition and use of listening, speaking, reading, writing, reasoning or mathematical abilities are present among persons diagnosed with learning disabilities (LDs). Previous studies suggest a significant relationship between lead (Pb) exposure and LDs. This study evaluated the potential dose-response relationship between blood Pb levels and the risk of LDs. This cross-sectional study examined 1411 children (32,788,743 weighted-persons) between 6 and 15 years old from the 2003-2004 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) by analyzing demographics, health related-questions, and laboratory tests using survey logistic and frequency modeling in SAS. On a µg Pb/dL basis, a significant dose-dependent relationship between increasing blood Pb levels and increasing risk of LDs was observed (odds ratio (OR) = 1.21, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.03-1.43). The relationship remained significant when examining covariates such as gender and race (OR = 1.19, 95% CI = 1.00-1.40). By contrast, no dose-dependence was observed between increasing blood Pb levels and the risk of hay fever in the last year (OR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.56-1.056), a non-plausibly biologically related outcome of blood Pb levels. Persons in the 50th-75th (12.80%) and 75th-100th (17.14%) percentiles of blood Pb were significantly more likely to have LDs than persons in the 0-50th percentile of blood Pb (8.78%). An estimated 1 million persons born in the US from 1989 to 1998 developed LDs from elevated blood Pb levels. Overall, this study revealed a significant dose-dependent association between increasing childhood blood Pb levels and the risk of a LD diagnosis, but it was not possible to ascribe a direct cause-effect relationship between blood Pb exposure and LD diagnosis. Childhood Pb exposure should be considered when evaluating children with LDs, and continuing efforts should be made to reduce Pb exposure.Entities:
Keywords: NHANES; lead; learning disability; neurodevelopmental disorder
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28994742 PMCID: PMC5664703 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph14101202
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
A summary of the composition of weighted persons (n = 32,788,743) examined in this study.
| Parameter Examined | Measurement |
|---|---|
| Gender (%) | |
| Males | 17,205,646 (52.47%) |
| Females | 15,583,097 (47.53%) |
| Age/Birth Year | |
| Mean Age ± std (range = 6–15 years-old) | 10.71 ± 2.84 |
| Mean Birth Year ± std (1989–1998) | 1993 ± 2.84 |
| Race (%) | |
| Non-Hispanic White | 20,419,410 (62.28%) |
| Non-Hispanic Black | 5,942,135 (18.12%) |
| Hispanic | 6,427,198 (19.60%) |
| Diagnosis Status (%) | |
| Diagnosed with Learning Disability | 3,911,498 (11.93%) |
| Diagnosed with Hay Fever in the Last Year | 3,952,024 (12.05%) |
| Mean Blood Heavy Metal Level ± std | |
| Pb (µg/dL) | 1.32 ± 0.95 |
dL = deciliter, Pb = lead, µg = microgram, std = standard deviation of the mean.
A summary of survey logistic regression models 1 generated in this study to examine the potential relationship between blood Pb levels and the risk of learning disabilities.
| Model | Variable | Odds Ratio | 95% Confidence Interval | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| I | Blood Pb (µg/dL) | 1.21 | 1.03 to 1.43 | 0.018 |
| II | Blood Pb (µg/dL) | 1.19 | 1.00 to 1.40 | 0.044 |
| Gender (female = 2 vs. male = 1) | 0.45 | 0.246 to 0.83 | 0.011 | |
| Race (non-Hispanic Black vs. non-Hispanic White) | 1.01 | 0.65 to 1.56 | 0.59 | |
| Race (Hispanic vs. non-Hispanic White) | 0.83 | 0.54 to 1.27 | 0.30 |
1 The models employed used stratum, cluster, and weight. This table reveals that increasing blood Pb levels significantly increase the risk of learning disabilities, even when considering covariates. dL = deciliter, Pb = lead, µg = microgram.
A summary of survey frequency modeling 1 to evaluate the potential relationship between increasing blood Pb levels and the risk of learning disabilities.
| Blood Pb Level of Exposure (µg/dL) | Weighted Number Diagnosed with LD (%) | Weighted Total Number of Individuals | Outcome Measurement |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 to 50th Percentile [reference] | 1,426,322 (8.78) | 16,245,275 | |
| 50th to 75th Percentile | 1,032,781 (12.80) | 8,069,241 | |
| Prevalence Ratio (95% CI) | 1.46 (1.11 to 1.92) | ||
| Rao-Scott χ2 | 9.81 | ||
| DF | 1 | ||
| 0.0017 | |||
| Prevalence Attributable Rate | 0.040 | ||
| 75th to 100th Percentile | 1,452,394 (17.14) | 8,474,227 | |
| Prevalence Ratio (95% CI) | 1.95 (1.16 to 3.29) | ||
| Rao-Scott χ2 | 8.63 | ||
| DF | 1 | ||
| 0.0033 | |||
| Prevalence Attributable Rate | 0.084 |
1 The models employed used stratum, cluster, and weight. This table shows that blood Pb levels in the 50th to 75th percentile group and the 75th to 100th percentile group were associated with a significantly increased risk of an learning disability diagnosis in comparison to the 0 to 50th percentile reference group. DF = degrees of freedom, dL = deciliter, LD = learning disabilities, Pb = lead, µg = microgram.