Literature DB >> 28994664

Compton camera study for high efficiency SPECT and benchmark with Anger system.

M Fontana1, D Dauvergne, J M Létang, J-L Ley, É Testa.   

Abstract

Single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) is at present one of the major techniques for non-invasive diagnostics in nuclear medicine. The clinical routine is mostly based on collimated cameras, originally proposed by Hal Anger. Due to the presence of mechanical collimation, detection efficiency and energy acceptance are limited and fixed by the system's geometrical features. In order to overcome these limitations, the application of Compton cameras for SPECT has been investigated for several years. In this study we compare a commercial SPECT-Anger device, the General Electric HealthCare Infinia system with a High Energy General Purpose (HEGP) collimator, and the Compton camera prototype under development by the French collaboration CLaRyS, through Monte Carlo simulations (GATE-GEANT4 Application for Tomographic Emission-version 7.1 and GEANT4 version 9.6, respectively). Given the possible introduction of new radio-emitters at higher energies intrinsically allowed by the Compton camera detection principle, the two detectors are exposed to point-like sources at increasing primary gamma energies, from actual isotopes already suggested for nuclear medicine applications. The Compton camera prototype is first characterized for SPECT application by studying the main parameters affecting its imaging performance: detector energy resolution and random coincidence rate. The two detector performances are then compared in terms of radial event distribution, detection efficiency and final image, obtained by gamma transmission analysis for the Anger system, and with an iterative List Mode-Maximum Likelihood Expectation Maximization (LM-MLEM) algorithm for the Compton reconstruction. The results show for the Compton camera a detection efficiency increased by a factor larger than an order of magnitude with respect to the Anger camera, associated with an enhanced spatial resolution for energies beyond 500 keV. We discuss the advantages of Compton camera application for SPECT if compared to present commercial Anger systems, with particular focus on dose delivered to the patient, examination time, and spatial uncertainties.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28994664     DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aa926a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  6 in total

Review 1.  Compton imaging for medical applications.

Authors:  Hideaki Tashima; Taiga Yamaya
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2022-07-22

2.  Performance demonstration of a hybrid Compton camera with an active pinhole for wide-band X-ray and gamma-ray imaging.

Authors:  Akihisa Omata; Jun Kataoka; Kazuya Fujieda; Shogo Sato; Eri Kuriyama; Hiroki Kato; Atsushi Toyoshima; Takahiro Teramoto; Kazuhiro Ooe; Yuwei Liu; Keiko Matsunaga; Takashi Kamiya; Tadashi Watabe; Eku Shimosegawa; Jun Hatazawa
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-08-20       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Crosstalk Reduction Using a Dual Energy Window Scatter Correction in Compton Imaging.

Authors:  Makoto Sakai; Raj Kumar Parajuli; Yoshiki Kubota; Nobuteru Kubo; Mitsutaka Yamaguchi; Yuto Nagao; Naoki Kawachi; Mikiko Kikuchi; Kazuo Arakawa; Mutsumi Tashiro
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-26       Impact factor: 3.576

4.  Proton range verification with MACACO II Compton camera enhanced by a neural network for event selection.

Authors:  Enrique Muñoz; Ana Ros; Marina Borja-Lloret; John Barrio; Peter Dendooven; Josep F Oliver; Ikechi Ozoemelam; Jorge Roser; Gabriela Llosá
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 5.  Development and Applications of Compton Camera-A Review.

Authors:  Raj Kumar Parajuli; Makoto Sakai; Ramila Parajuli; Mutsumi Tashiro
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-09-28       Impact factor: 3.847

6.  Improved iterative reconstruction method for Compton imaging using median filter.

Authors:  Makoto Sakai; Raj Kumar Parajuli; Yoshiki Kubota; Nobuteru Kubo; Mikiko Kikuchi; Kazuo Arakawa; Takashi Nakano
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-03-06       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.