BACKGROUND: Prescribing criteria have been suggested for proprotein convertase subtilisin kexin-9 (PCSK-9) inhibitors but few studies exist of their real-world effectiveness. METHODS: This study audited PCSK-9 inhibitor therapy in 105 consecutive patients from two hospital centres-a university hospital (UH; n = 70) and a district general hospital (DGH; n = 35). Baseline characteristics including cardiovascular disease risk factors, NICE qualification criteria, efficacy and side effects were assessed. RESULTS: Baseline LDL-C levels were similar in both centres. NICE criteria were met for 2.05 items in the whole study (UH patients 1.7 and DGH patients 2.7). District general hospital patients were more likely to have familial hypercholesterolaemia (89 vs 69%; P = .02); intolerance to statins (94 vs 52%; P < .001) and polyvascular disease (42% vs 17%; P = .005). Prescriptions (evolocumab 73%; alirocumab 23%) were collected by 76% of patients (UH 64% vs DGH 100%). Therapy was discontinued by time of review in 15% of patients (UH 7% vs DGH 25%; P = .02). In adherent patients PCSK-9 inhibitor treatment reduced TC by 28% (2.24 ± 2.39 mmol/L; P < .001) and LDL-C by 49% (2.10 ± 1.33 mmol/L; P < .001). A LDL-C < 2.5 mmol/L was achieved in 30% of patients and <2.0 mmol/L in 20%. PCSK-9 therapy was effective and safe in patients with increased lipoprotein (a), diagnosed muscle diseases (including myopathies and muscular dystrophy) or poststatin rhabdomyolysis, nephrotic syndrome or HIV disease. Mixed results were obtained in patients with significant mixed hyperlipidaemia. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that PCSK-9 inhibitors are effective but that prescriptions should not be changed to long-term delivery until patients have been reviewed and shown to be adherent.
BACKGROUND: Prescribing criteria have been suggested for proprotein convertase subtilisin kexin-9 (PCSK-9) inhibitors but few studies exist of their real-world effectiveness. METHODS: This study audited PCSK-9 inhibitor therapy in 105 consecutive patients from two hospital centres-a university hospital (UH; n = 70) and a district general hospital (DGH; n = 35). Baseline characteristics including cardiovascular disease risk factors, NICE qualification criteria, efficacy and side effects were assessed. RESULTS: Baseline LDL-C levels were similar in both centres. NICE criteria were met for 2.05 items in the whole study (UH patients 1.7 and DGHpatients 2.7). District general hospital patients were more likely to have familial hypercholesterolaemia (89 vs 69%; P = .02); intolerance to statins (94 vs 52%; P < .001) and polyvascular disease (42% vs 17%; P = .005). Prescriptions (evolocumab 73%; alirocumab 23%) were collected by 76% of patients (UH 64% vs DGH 100%). Therapy was discontinued by time of review in 15% of patients (UH 7% vs DGH 25%; P = .02). In adherent patientsPCSK-9 inhibitor treatment reduced TC by 28% (2.24 ± 2.39 mmol/L; P < .001) and LDL-C by 49% (2.10 ± 1.33 mmol/L; P < .001). A LDL-C < 2.5 mmol/L was achieved in 30% of patients and <2.0 mmol/L in 20%. PCSK-9 therapy was effective and safe in patients with increased lipoprotein (a), diagnosed muscle diseases (including myopathies and muscular dystrophy) or poststatin rhabdomyolysis, nephrotic syndrome or HIV disease. Mixed results were obtained in patients with significant mixed hyperlipidaemia. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that PCSK-9 inhibitors are effective but that prescriptions should not be changed to long-term delivery until patients have been reviewed and shown to be adherent.
Authors: Alberto Cordero; Moisés Rodríguez-Mañero; Lorenzo Fácila; M Rosa Fernández-Olmo; Manuel J Gómez-Martínez; Alfonso Valle; Jose Mª Castellano; Miriam Martín Toro; José Seijas-Amigo; Alvaro Vicedo; José R González-Juanatey Journal: J Diabetes Metab Disord Date: 2020-06-01
Authors: Anindita Chakraborty; Jing Pang; Dick C Chan; Wendy Barnett; Ann Marie Woodward; Mary Vorster; Gerald F Watts Journal: Clin Cardiol Date: 2021-05-06 Impact factor: 3.287
Authors: Muhammed T Gürgöze; Annemarie H G Muller-Hansma; Michelle M Schreuder; Annette M H Galema-Boers; Eric Boersma; Jeanine E Roeters van Lennep Journal: Clin Pharmacol Ther Date: 2018-09-07 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: Krzysztof Chlebus; Barbara Cybulska; Piotr Dobrowolski; Marzena Romanowska-Kocejko; Marta Żarczyńska-Buchowiecka; Natasza Gilis-Malinowska; Aneta Stróżyk; Justyna Borowiec-Wolna; Marcin Pajkowski; Beata Bobrowska; Renata Rajtar-Salwa; Aleksandra Kwapiszewska; Małgorzata Waluś-Miarka; Magdalena Chmara; Rafał Gałąska; Maciej Małecki; Tomasz Zdrojewski; Marcin Gruchała Journal: Cardiol J Date: 2022-02-11 Impact factor: 2.737
Authors: Tim Reynolds; Peter Carey; Jacob George; Gerasimos Konidaris; Deepa Narayanan; Sudarshan Ramachandran; Luke Saunders; Adie Viljoen; Gordon Ferns Journal: Drugs Real World Outcomes Date: 2019-12
Authors: Tim Hollstein; Ursula Kassner; Thomas Grenkowitz; Friederike Schumann; Thomas Bobbert; Elisabeth Steinhagen-Thiessen Journal: Am J Cardiovasc Drugs Date: 2021-01 Impact factor: 3.571