Literature DB >> 2899393

A comparison of the identification of group A streptococci and enterococci by two rapid pyrrolidonyl aminopeptidase methods.

D B Gordon1, P C DeGirolami, S Bolivar, G Karafotias, K Eichelberger.   

Abstract

Group A streptococci and enterococci can be differentiated from other streptococci by their ability to cleave L-pyrrolidonyl-beta-napthylamide (PYR). The authors evaluated two pyrrolidonyl aminopeptidase (PYRase) systems--Minitek (BBL Microbiology Systems, Cockeysville, MD) and Identicult-AE (Scott Laboratories, Inc., Fiskeville, RI)--for the presumptive identification of Group A streptococci and enterococci. Eighty-three Group A streptococci, 77 beta-hemolytic non-Group A streptococci, 74 enterococci, 56 nonenterococcal non-beta-hemolytic streptococci, 1 Streptococcus pneumoniae, and 1 Aerococcus were tested. Compared with results obtained with reference methods (bile esculin agar and 6.5% [w/v] sodium chloride for identification of enterococci, and latex agglutination tests by Streptex [Burroughs Wellcome, NC] for grouping of beta-hemolytic streptococci) both the Identicult-AE and MInitek systems were 100% sensitive and specific for identification of both enterococci and Group A beta-hemolytic streptococci. Advantages of the Identicult-AE system compared with Minitek were the use of a smaller inoculum for which subculture was not necessary, incubation at room temperature rather than at 37 degrees C, and lower cost. Both PYRase kits tested, and in particular the Identicult-AE system, were very easy to use and should be considered as rapid, reliable, and cost-effective alternative methods for the presumptive identification of Group A streptococci and enterococci in the clinical laboratory.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 2899393     DOI: 10.1093/ajcp/90.2.210

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol        ISSN: 0002-9173            Impact factor:   2.493


  4 in total

Review 1.  Use of enzyme tests in characterization and identification of aerobic and facultatively anaerobic gram-positive cocci.

Authors:  S Bascomb; M Manafi
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 26.132

2.  Cost-effective, clinically relevant method for rapid identification of beta-hemolytic streptococci and enterococci.

Authors:  R Kirby; K L Ruoff
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Evaluation of three disk tests for identification of enterococci, leuconostocs, and pediococci.

Authors:  R Facklam; N Pigott; R Franklin; J Elliott
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 4.  Identification, classification, and clinical relevance of catalase-negative, gram-positive cocci, excluding the streptococci and enterococci.

Authors:  R Facklam; J A Elliott
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 26.132

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.