Literature DB >> 28993892

Screening investigations in small-for-gestational-age near-term and term infants.

Mohan B Krishnamurthy1, Abigail Popiel2, Atul Malhotra3,4,5.   

Abstract

The aims of this study are to examine how frequently near-term and term small-for-gestational-age (SGA) infants were investigated in our clinical practice, whether being born less than the third centile for weight increased the yield of positive investigations, and whether there were additional characteristics in infants with positive investigations. This retrospective cohort study was compiled using a database of a large maternity network, using the search near term and term gestational age (greater than or equal to 35 weeks) over a span of 4 years. SGA babies were further filtered into less than the tenth centile and third centile. Out of a population of 30,461 infants in the study period, 3437 (11.3%) SGA infants were identified. Four hundred fifteen SGA infants (12.1%) underwent screening investigations, of which 49 infants (11.8%) yielded a positive investigation. 27.2% of karyotypes, 12.8% of cranial ultrasounds and 0.4% of urine CMV tests showed positive results in < 10th centile group. Being born less than the third centile for weight did not increase the yield of positive investigations. Most infants with positive investigations had an additional maternal or neonatal characteristic or risk factor present.
CONCLUSION: SGA babies without additional maternal or neonatal characteristics have a poor yield on neonatal screening investigations. Additional characteristics may be considered while deciding whether a SGA infant needs screening investigation. What is Known: • Small-for-gestational-age (SGA) infants have an increased risk of short- and long-term complications. • Whilst the causes for SGA are multifactorial, there has been a tendency to undertake screening investigations like Toxoplasma, Others, Rubella, Cytomegalovirus, Herpes group of viruses (TORCH) screening and cranial ultrasounds in the neonatal period. What is New: • Comprehensive study investigating the rates of screening in near-term and term SGA population. • The yield of screening tests for near-term and term SGA infants without additional antenatal and postnatal characteristics is low.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cranial ultrasound; Cytomegalovirus; IUGR; Karyotype

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28993892     DOI: 10.1007/s00431-017-3031-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Pediatr        ISSN: 0340-6199            Impact factor:   3.183


  20 in total

Review 1.  The thrifty phenotype hypothesis.

Authors:  C N Hales; D J Barker
Journal:  Br Med Bull       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.291

2.  Global Prevalence of Small for Gestational Age Births.

Authors:  Robert E Black
Journal:  Nestle Nutr Inst Workshop Ser       Date:  2015-06-16

3.  Intrauterine growth retardation.

Authors:  F C Battaglia
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1970-04-01       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Australian national birthweight percentiles by sex and gestational age, 1998-2007.

Authors:  Timothy A Dobbins; Elizabeth A Sullivan; Christine L Roberts; Judy M Simpson
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  2012-09-03       Impact factor: 7.738

5.  Is routine TORCH screening and urine CMV culture warranted in small for gestational age neonates?

Authors:  S van der Weiden; E P de Jong; A B Te Pas; J M Middeldorp; A C T M Vossen; M Rijken; F J Walther; E Lopriore
Journal:  Early Hum Dev       Date:  2010-12-09       Impact factor: 2.079

6.  Behavioural problems at the age of eleven years in preterm-born children with or without fetal brain sparing: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Antonia J M van den Broek; Joke H Kok; Bregje A Houtzager; Sicco A Scherjon
Journal:  Early Hum Dev       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.079

7.  Neurologic outcomes at school age in very preterm infants born with severe or mild growth restriction.

Authors:  Isabelle Guellec; Alexandre Lapillonne; Sylvain Renolleau; Marie-Laure Charlaluk; Jean-Christophe Roze; Stéphane Marret; Rachel Vieux; Kaminski Monique; Pierre-Yves Ancel
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2011-03-07       Impact factor: 7.124

8.  Yield and costs of screening growth-retarded infants for torch infections.

Authors:  N A Khan; S N Kazzi
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.862

9.  The C in TORCH: a cost-effective alternative to screening small-for-gestational-age infants.

Authors:  Daniel Wei; Smeeta R Sardesai; Lorayne Barton
Journal:  Neonatology       Date:  2014-04-08       Impact factor: 4.035

10.  National and regional estimates of term and preterm babies born small for gestational age in 138 low-income and middle-income countries in 2010.

Authors:  Anne C C Lee; Joanne Katz; Hannah Blencowe; Simon Cousens; Naoko Kozuki; Joshua P Vogel; Linda Adair; Abdullah H Baqui; Zulfiqar A Bhutta; Laura E Caulfield; Parul Christian; Siân E Clarke; Majid Ezzati; Wafaie Fawzi; Rogelio Gonzalez; Lieven Huybregts; Simon Kariuki; Patrick Kolsteren; John Lusingu; Tanya Marchant; Mario Merialdi; Aroonsri Mongkolchati; Luke C Mullany; James Ndirangu; Marie-Louise Newell; Jyh Kae Nien; David Osrin; Dominique Roberfroid; Heather E Rosen; Ayesha Sania; Mariangela F Silveira; James Tielsch; Anjana Vaidya; Barbara A Willey; Joy E Lawn; Robert E Black
Journal:  Lancet Glob Health       Date:  2013-06-25       Impact factor: 26.763

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Vaccines for Perinatal and Congenital Infections-How Close Are We?

Authors:  Tulika Singh; Claire E Otero; Katherine Li; Sarah M Valencia; Ashley N Nelson; Sallie R Permar
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2020-12-15       Impact factor: 3.418

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.