Literature DB >> 28992399

Comparison of the Lupus Foundation of America-Rapid Evaluation of Activity in Lupus to More Complex Disease Activity Instruments As Evaluated by Clinical Investigators or Real-World Clinicians.

Anca D Askanase1, Samantha C Nguyen1, Karen Costenbader2, S Sam Lim3, Diane Kamen4, Cynthia Aranow5, Jennifer Grossman6, Teja M Kapoor1, DeAnna Baker-Frost4, Teresa Aberle7, Aikaterini Thanou-Stavraki7, Leslie M Hanrahan8, Mimi Kim9, Joan T Merrill10.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Lupus disease measures such as the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) and the British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) index are challenging to interpret. The Lupus Foundation of America-Rapid Evaluation of Activity in Lupus (LFA-REAL) is intended to provide an efficient application of anchored visual analog scores, each representing the individual severity of active symptoms, with the sum of individual scores deriving an overall disease activity assessment. Our objective was to compare the performance of LFA-REAL to systemic lupus erythematosus disease activity assessments and compare scores between trained lupus clinical investigators and clinicians.
METHODS: Investigators scored the SLEDAI, BILAG, physician's global assessment (PGA), and LFA-REAL, while the clinicians scored the LFA-REAL. The level of agreement between physicians and instruments was determined.
RESULTS: The study included 99 patients (93% women, 31% white, mean ± SD ages 43.4 ± 13.2 years). At the first visit, the mean ± SD SLEDAI score was 5.5 ± 4.5, BILAG score 6.7 ± 7.8, and PGA score 33.6 ± 24.5. The mean ± SD investigator LFA-REAL score was 46.2 ± 42.9, and clinician LFA-REAL score 56.1 ± 53.6. At the second visit, the mean ± SD investigator LFA-REAL score was 41.3 ± 36.7, and clinician LFA-REAL score 48.3 ± 42.6. Total LFA-REAL scores correlated positively with PGA, SLEDAI, and BILAG (ρ = 0.58-0.88, P < 0.001). LFA-REAL scores produced correlation coefficients of ρ > 0.7 for musculoskeletal, mucocutaneous, and renal BILAG domains. The intraclass correlation coefficient between the LFA-REAL scores of investigators and clinicians was 0.79 for visit 1 (P < 0.001) and 0.86 for visit 2 (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: The LFA-REAL provides a reliable surrogate for more complicated disease activity measures when used by lupus clinical investigators or clinicians.
© 2017, American College of Rheumatology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 28992399     DOI: 10.1002/acr.23445

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)        ISSN: 2151-464X            Impact factor:   4.794


  5 in total

Review 1.  Real-world evidence in rheumatic diseases: relevance and lessons learnt.

Authors:  Durga Prasanna Misra; Vikas Agarwal
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 2.631

Review 2.  Clinical disease activity and flare in SLE: Current concepts and novel biomarkers.

Authors:  Aikaterini Thanou; Eldon Jupe; Mohan Purushothaman; Timothy B Niewold; Melissa E Munroe
Journal:  J Autoimmun       Date:  2021-02-22       Impact factor: 7.094

3.  Development and content validity of the Lupus Foundation of America rapid evaluation of activity in lupus (LFA-REAL™): a patient-reported outcome measure for lupus disease activity.

Authors:  Anca D Askanase; R Paola Daly; Miya Okado; Kayla Neville; Avery Pong; Leslie M Hanrahan; Joan T Merrill
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 3.186

4.  Scoring systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) disease activity with simple, rapid outcome measures.

Authors:  Aikaterini Thanou; Judith A James; Cristina Arriens; Teresa Aberle; Eliza Chakravarty; Joseph Rawdon; Stavros Stavrakis; Joan T Merrill; Anca Askanase
Journal:  Lupus Sci Med       Date:  2019-12-30

5.  Assessment of SLE activity for acute clinical decision-making: use of a colour-coded threat-level approach for the non-rheumatologist.

Authors:  Cindy Flower
Journal:  Lupus Sci Med       Date:  2021-02
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.