Literature DB >> 28992296

Efficacy and Safety of Sacubitril/Valsartan (LCZ696) Compared With Olmesartan in Elderly Asian Patients (≥65 Years) With Systolic Hypertension.

Ouppatham Supasyndh1, Jian'an Wang2, Kudsia Hafeez3, Ying Zhang3, Jack Zhang3, Hiromi Rakugi4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Systolic hypertension is common in elderly patients and remains a challenge to treat effectively. The efficacy and safety of sacubitril/valsartan (LCZ696), a first-in-class angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor, vs. olmesartan was evaluated in elderly Asian patients (≥65 years) with systolic hypertension.
METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind, 14-week study, patients initially received once-daily sacubitril/valsartan 100 mg or olmesartan 10 mg, increased to sacubitril/valsartan 200 mg or olmesartan 20 mg at week 4. At week 10, for patients with blood pressure (BP) >140/90 mm Hg, the doses were up-titrated to sacubitril/valsartan 400 mg or olmesartan 40 mg. The primary assessment was superiority of sacubitril/valsartan vs. olmesartan in reducing office mean sitting (ms) systolic BP (msSBP) from baseline at week 10. Secondary efficacy assessments included changes from baseline in ms diastolic BP (msDBP), ms pulse pressure (msPP), 24-hour mean ambulatory (ma) BP (maBP), and maPP at week 10; msBP and msPP at weeks 4 and 14.
RESULTS: Overall, 588 patients were randomized (mean age, 70.7 years; baseline msBP, 160.3/84.9 mm Hg; msPP, 75.4 mm Hg). At week 10, sacubitril/valsartan provided superior msSBP reductions vs. olmesartan (22.71 vs. 16.11 mm Hg, respectively; P < 0.001); similarly, reductions from baseline in other BP and PP assessments were significantly greater with sacubitril/valsartan. At week 14, despite more patients requiring up-titration in the olmesartan group, msBP and msPP reductions from baseline were significantly greater with sacubitril/valsartan. Both treatments were generally well-tolerated.
CONCLUSION: Sacubitril/valsartan is more effective than olmesartan in reducing BP in elderly Asian patients with systolic hypertension. © American Journal of Hypertension, Ltd 2017. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com

Entities:  

Keywords:  Asian; angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor; blood pressure; elderly; hypertension; pulse pressure; sacubitril/valsartan; systolic hypertension

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28992296     DOI: 10.1093/ajh/hpx111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hypertens        ISSN: 0895-7061            Impact factor:   2.689


  17 in total

1.  Effect of Sacubitril/Valsartan on Reducing the Risk of Arrhythmia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Ruxin Wang; Haowen Ye; Li Ma; Jinjing Wei; Ying Wang; Xiaofang Zhang; Lihong Wang
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-07-01

Review 2.  Angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors for hypertension-hemodynamic effects and relevance to hypertensive heart disease.

Authors:  Kazuomi Kario; Bryan Williams
Journal:  Hypertens Res       Date:  2022-05-02       Impact factor: 5.528

3.  Expert panel consensus recommendations for ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in Asia: The HOPE Asia Network.

Authors:  Kazuomi Kario; Jinho Shin; Chen-Huan Chen; Peera Buranakitjaroen; Yook-Chin Chia; Romeo Divinagracia; Jennifer Nailes; Satoshi Hoshide; Saulat Siddique; Jorge Sison; Arieska Ann Soenarta; Guru Prasad Sogunuru; Jam Chin Tay; Boon Wee Teo; Yuda Turana; Yuqing Zhang; Sungha Park; Huynh Van Minh; Ji-Guang Wang
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 3.738

4.  Efficacy and safety of sacubitril/valsartan compared with olmesartan in Asian patients with essential hypertension: A randomized, double-blind, 8-week study.

Authors:  Yong Huo; Weimin Li; Randy Webb; Li Zhao; Qian Wang; Weinong Guo
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2018-12-11       Impact factor: 3.738

Review 5.  Angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors: Comprehensive review and implications in hypertension treatment.

Authors:  Koichi Yamamoto; Hiromi Rakugi
Journal:  Hypertens Res       Date:  2021-07-21       Impact factor: 3.872

Review 6.  Sacubitril/valsartan: evaluation of safety and efficacy as an antihypertensive treatment.

Authors:  Sarah L Anderson; Joel C Marrs
Journal:  Drugs Context       Date:  2018-08-06

7.  Anti-Hypertensive Effect of Sacubitril/Valsartan: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Renato De Vecchis; Silvia Soreca; Carmelina Ariano
Journal:  Cardiol Res       Date:  2019-02-24

8.  Effect and safety of LCZ696 in the treatment of hypertension: A meta-analysis of 9 RCT studies.

Authors:  Qiongqiong Li; Lina Li; Fanghao Wang; Wei Zhang; Yipeng Guo; Fuzhen Wang; Youxia Liu; Junya Jia; Shan Lin
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 1.817

9.  A New Approach for Hypertension: the Case of Sacubitril/Valsartan Experienced in Randomized Controlled Trials That Selectively Restrict Its Use to the Hypertension of the Elderly.

Authors:  Renato De Vecchis; Carmelina Ariano; Silvia Soreca
Journal:  J Clin Med Res       Date:  2018-10-09

Review 10.  Effect of sacubitril/valsartan on renal function: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Francesco Spannella; Federico Giulietti; Andrea Filipponi; Riccardo Sarzani
Journal:  ESC Heart Fail       Date:  2020-09-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.