Literature DB >> 28992001

Genomic inbreeding depression for climatic adaptation of tropical beef cattle.

A Reverter, L R Porto-Neto, M R S Fortes, P Kasarapu, M A R de Cara, H M Burrow, S A Lehnert.   

Abstract

Inbreeding has the potential to negatively impact animal performance. Strategies to monitor and mitigate inbreeding depression require that it can be accurately estimated. Here, we used genomewide SNP data to explore 3 alternative measures of genomic inbreeding: the diagonal elements of the genomic relationship matrix (FGRM), the proportion of homozygous SNP (FHOM), and the proportion of the genome covered by runs of homozygosity (FROH). We used 2,111 Brahman (BR) and 2,550 Tropical Composite (TC) cattle with phenotypes recorded for 10 traits of relevance to tropical adaptation. We further explored 3 marker densities ranging from a high-density chip (729,068 SNP), a medium-density chip (71,726 SNP) specifically designed for cattle, and a low-density chip (18,860 SNP) associated with the measures of inbreeding. Measures of FGRM were highly correlated across the 3 SNP densities and negatively correlated with FHOM and FROH in the BR population. In both populations, there was a strong positive correlation for each measure of inbreeding across the 3 SNP panels. We found significant ( < 0.01) inbreeding depression for various traits, particularly when using the highest-density SNP chip in the BR population, where inbreeding was negatively associated with coat color and coat type such that inbred animals presented shorter, slicker, and lighter coats. Based on FGRM using the medium-density chip, we found that a 1% increase in inbreeding in the BR and TC populations was associated with a decrease of 0.514 and 0.579 kg BW, respectively, in yearlings. In the TC population, a 1% increase in FHOM was associated with a decrease in BCS of -0.636% ( < 0.001). The low-density chip, comprising SNP associated with inbreeding, captured genes, and regions with pleiotropic effects ( < 0.001). However, it did not improve our ability to identify inbreeding depression, relative to the use of higher-density panels. We conclude that where heterogeneous populations are present, such as in tropical environments where composite animals abound, measures of inbreeding that do not depend on allele frequencies, such as FHOM and FROH, are preferable for estimating genomic inbreeding. Finally, the sustainable intensification of livestock systems in tropical regions will rely on genetic safeguards to ensure that productivity is improved while also adapting animals to cope with climate change. The results of this study are a step toward achieving that goal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28992001     DOI: 10.2527/jas2017.1643

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  9 in total

1.  Association analysis of loci implied in "buffering" epistasis.

Authors:  Antonio Reverter; Zulma G Vitezica; Marina Naval-Sánchez; John Henshall; Fernanda S S Raidan; Yutao Li; Karin Meyer; Nicholas J Hudson; Laercio R Porto-Neto; Andrés Legarra
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-03-01       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Semi-parametric estimates of population accuracy and bias of predictions of breeding values and future phenotypes using the LR method.

Authors:  Andres Legarra; Antonio Reverter
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2018-11-06       Impact factor: 4.297

3.  A multivariate analysis with direct additive and inbreeding depression load effects.

Authors:  Luis Varona; Juan Altarriba; Carlos Moreno; María Martínez-Castillero; Joaquim Casellas
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2019-12-26       Impact factor: 4.297

4.  Trends in genetic diversity and the effect of inbreeding in American Angus cattle under genomic selection.

Authors:  Emmanuel A Lozada-Soto; Christian Maltecca; Duc Lu; Stephen Miller; John B Cole; Francesco Tiezzi
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 4.297

5.  Genomic Patterns of Homozygosity in Chinese Local Cattle.

Authors:  Lingyang Xu; Guoyao Zhao; Liu Yang; Bo Zhu; Yan Chen; Lupei Zhang; Xue Gao; Huijiang Gao; George E Liu; Junya Li
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-11-18       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Estimating dominance genetic variances for growth traits in American Angus males using genomic models.

Authors:  Carolina A Garcia-Baccino; Daniela A L Lourenco; Stephen Miller; Rodolfo J C Cantet; Zulma G Vitezica
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-01-01       Impact factor: 3.159

7.  Comparison of Genetic Merit for Weight and Meat Traits between the Polled and Horned Cattle in Multiple Beef Breeds.

Authors:  Imtiaz A S Randhawa; Michael R McGowan; Laercio R Porto-Neto; Ben J Hayes; Russell E Lyons
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 2.752

8.  Grid search approach to discriminate between old and recent inbreeding using phenotypic, pedigree and genomic information.

Authors:  Pattarapol Sumreddee; El Hamidi Hay; Sajjad Toghiani; Andrew Roberts; Samuel E Aggrey; Romdhane Rekaya
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2021-07-13       Impact factor: 3.969

Review 9.  Sustainable Intensification of Beef Production in the Tropics: The Role of Genetically Improving Sexual Precocity of Heifers.

Authors:  Gerardo Alves Fernandes Júnior; Delvan Alves Silva; Lucio Flavio Macedo Mota; Thaise Pinto de Melo; Larissa Fernanda Simielli Fonseca; Danielly Beraldo Dos Santos Silva; Roberto Carvalheiro; Lucia Galvão Albuquerque
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 2.752

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.