Abhay R Vasavada1, Vaishali Vasavada2, Sajani K Shah2, Rupal H Trivedi2, Viraj A Vasavada2, Shail A Vasavada2, Samaresh Srivastava2, Aditya Sudhalkar2. 1. From the Iladevi Cataract & IOL Research Centre (A.B. Vasavada, V. Vasavada, Shah, V.A. Vasavada, S.A. Vasavada, Srivastava, Sudhalkar), Ahmedabad, India; Storm Eye Institute (Trivedi), Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA. Electronic address: icirc@abhayvasavada.com. 2. From the Iladevi Cataract & IOL Research Centre (A.B. Vasavada, V. Vasavada, Shah, V.A. Vasavada, S.A. Vasavada, Srivastava, Sudhalkar), Ahmedabad, India; Storm Eye Institute (Trivedi), Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To compare complications in children up to 4 years old having cataract surgery withintraocular lens (IOL) implantation using 2 techniques: in-the-bag IOL with anterior vitrectomy or optic capture of IOL with no anterior vitrectomy. SETTING: Iladevi Cataract & IOL Research Centre, Ahmedabad, India. DESIGN: Prospective randomized control clinical trial. METHODS: The study included children having cataract surgery with IOL implantation. Patients were randomized to Group 1 (in-the-bag 3-piece hydrophobic acrylic IOL [Acrysof MA60AC] with anterior vitrectomy) or Group 2 (optic capture of the same IOL without anterior vitrectomy). Intraoperative complications were documented. Postoperative visual axis obscuration (VAO), glaucoma, cell deposits on the IOL, and posterior synechiae were compared at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. RESULTS: The study comprised 61 children (61 eyes). The mean ages were 14.8 months ±11.47 (SD) in Group 1 (n = 30) and 18.2 ± 11.47 months in Group 2 (n = 31). Overall, only 1 eye in Group 1 developed a VAO requiring membranectomy 4 months postoperatively, and 2 eyes in Group 1 developed glaucoma over 12 months (P = .49). Intraocular lens cell deposits and posterior synechiae were comparable between groups. The IOL could not be captured in 5 eyes (16.1%); no complications occurred in these eyes. CONCLUSIONS: Optic capture of 3-piece hydrophobic acrylic IOLs could be achieved in most eyes. The VAO, glaucoma, and inflammation were comparable 12 months postoperatively. Thus, optic capture of an IOL is an alternative surgical technique that can be used to avoid vitrectomy, even in children younger than 4 years.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: To compare complications in children up to 4 years old having cataract surgery with intraocular lens (IOL) implantation using 2 techniques: in-the-bag IOL with anterior vitrectomy or optic capture of IOL with no anterior vitrectomy. SETTING: Iladevi Cataract & IOL Research Centre, Ahmedabad, India. DESIGN: Prospective randomized control clinical trial. METHODS: The study included children having cataract surgery with IOL implantation. Patients were randomized to Group 1 (in-the-bag 3-piece hydrophobic acrylic IOL [Acrysof MA60AC] with anterior vitrectomy) or Group 2 (optic capture of the same IOL without anterior vitrectomy). Intraoperative complications were documented. Postoperative visual axis obscuration (VAO), glaucoma, cell deposits on the IOL, and posterior synechiae were compared at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. RESULTS: The study comprised 61 children (61 eyes). The mean ages were 14.8 months ±11.47 (SD) in Group 1 (n = 30) and 18.2 ± 11.47 months in Group 2 (n = 31). Overall, only 1 eye in Group 1 developed a VAO requiring membranectomy 4 months postoperatively, and 2 eyes in Group 1 developed glaucoma over 12 months (P = .49). Intraocular lens cell deposits and posterior synechiae were comparable between groups. The IOL could not be captured in 5 eyes (16.1%); no complications occurred in these eyes. CONCLUSIONS: Optic capture of 3-piece hydrophobic acrylic IOLs could be achieved in most eyes. The VAO, glaucoma, and inflammation were comparable 12 months postoperatively. Thus, optic capture of an IOL is an alternative surgical technique that can be used to avoid vitrectomy, even in children younger than 4 years.
Authors: J E Self; R Taylor; A L Solebo; S Biswas; M Parulekar; A Dev Borman; J Ashworth; R McClenaghan; J Abbott; E O'Flynn; D Hildebrand; I C Lloyd Journal: Eye (Lond) Date: 2020-08-10 Impact factor: 3.775