Literature DB >> 28990579

Bone matrix production in hydroxyapatite-modified hydrogels suitable for bone bioprinting.

Annika Wenz1, Kirsten Borchers, Günter E M Tovar, Petra J Kluger.   

Abstract

Though bioprinting is a forward-looking approach in bone tissue engineering, the development of bioinks which are on the one hand processable with the chosen printing technique, and on the other hand possess the relevant mechanical as well as osteoconductive features remains a challenge. In the present study, polymer solutions based on methacrylated gelatin and methacrylated hyaluronic acid modified with hydroxyapatite (HAp) particles (5 wt%) were prepared. Encapsulation of primary human adipose-derived stem cells in the HAp-containing gels and culture for 28 d resulted in a storage moduli significantly increased to 126% ± 9.6% compared to the value on day 1 by the sole influence of the HAp. Additional use of osteogenic media components resulted in an increase of storage module up to 199% ± 27.8%. Similarly, the loss moduli was increased to 370% ± 122.1% under the influence of osteogenic media components and HAp. Those changes in rheological material characteristics indicate a distinct change in elastic and viscous hydrogel properties, and are attributed to extensive matrix production in the hydrogels by the encapsulated cells, what could also be proven by staining of bone matrix components like collagen I, fibronectin, alkaline phosphatase and osteopontin. When using the cell-laden polymer solutions as bioinks to build up relevant geometries, the ink showed excellent printability and the printed grid structure's integrity remained intact over a culture time of 28 d. Again, an intense matrix formation as well as upregulation of osteogenic markers by the encapsulated cells could be shown. In conclusion, we demonstrated that our HAp-containing bioinks and hydrogels on basis of methacrylated gelatin and hyaluronic acid are on the one hand highly suitable for the build-up of relevant three-dimensional geometries with microextrusion bioprinting, and on the other hand exhibit a significant positive effect on bone matrix development and remodeling in the hydrogels, as indicated by rheological measurements and staining of bone components. This makes the developed composite hydrogels an excellent material for bone bioprinting approaches.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28990579     DOI: 10.1088/1758-5090/aa91ec

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biofabrication        ISSN: 1758-5082            Impact factor:   9.954


  21 in total

Review 1.  The Role of the Microenvironment in Controlling the Fate of Bioprinted Stem Cells.

Authors:  Lauren N West-Livingston; Jihoon Park; Sang Jin Lee; Anthony Atala; James J Yoo
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2020-06-19       Impact factor: 60.622

Review 2.  Collagen-based bioinks for hard tissue engineering applications: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  C F Marques; G S Diogo; S Pina; J M Oliveira; T H Silva; R L Reis
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 3.896

3.  Advanced formulation of methacryl- and acetyl-modified biomolecules to achieve independent control of swelling and stiffness in printable hydrogels.

Authors:  Sandra Stier; Lisa Rebers; Veronika Schönhaar; Eva Hoch; Kirsten Borchers
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 3.896

4.  Flow Behavior Prior to Crosslinking: The Need for Precursor Rheology for Placement of Hydrogels in Medical Applications and for 3D Bioprinting.

Authors:  Jakob M Townsend; Emily C Beck; Stevin H Gehrke; Cory J Berkland; Michael S Detamore
Journal:  Prog Polym Sci       Date:  2019-01-17       Impact factor: 29.190

5.  Process-Structure-Quality Relationships of Three-Dimensional Printed Poly(Caprolactone)-Hydroxyapatite Scaffolds.

Authors:  Sam Gerdes; Azadeh Mostafavi; Srikanthan Ramesh; Adnan Memic; Iris V Rivero; Prahalada Rao; Ali Tamayol
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2020-02-27       Impact factor: 3.845

Review 6.  3D bioprinting and craniofacial regeneration.

Authors:  Ruby Dwivedi; Divya Mehrotra
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2020-08-14

7.  The effects of hydroxyapatite nanoparticles embedded in a MMP-sensitive photoclickable PEG hydrogel on encapsulated MC3T3-E1 pre-osteoblasts.

Authors:  Maria Carles-Carner; Leila S Saleh; Stephanie J Bryant
Journal:  Biomed Mater       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 3.715

Review 8.  3D Bioprinting Stem Cell Derived Tissues.

Authors:  Nishat Tasnim; Laura De la Vega; Shweta Anil Kumar; Laila Abelseth; Matthew Alonzo; Meitham Amereh; Binata Joddar; Stephanie M Willerth
Journal:  Cell Mol Bioeng       Date:  2018-05-21       Impact factor: 3.337

9.  Fabrication of Mechanically Reinforced Gelatin/Hydroxyapatite Bio-Composite Scaffolds by Core/Shell Nozzle Printing for Bone Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Haeri Kim; Hanjun Hwangbo; YoungWon Koo; GeunHyung Kim
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 10.  3D Printing-Encompassing the Facets of Dentistry.

Authors:  Gunpreet Oberoi; Sophie Nitsch; Michael Edelmayer; Klara Janjić; Anna Sonja Müller; Hermann Agis
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2018-11-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.