Literature DB >> 28990291

Performance evaluation of the automated nucleated red blood cell count of five commercial hematological analyzers.

G Da Rin1, M Vidali2, F Balboni3, A Benegiamo4, M Borin5, M L Ciardelli6, F Dima7, A Di Fabio8, A Fanelli9, F Fiorini10, S Francione5, L Germagnoli11, M Gioia12, T Lari13, M Lorubbio14, A Marini13, A Papa14, M Seghezzi15, L Solarino16, S Pipitone4, E Tilocca16, S Buoro15.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Recent automated hematology analyzers (HAs) can identify and report nucleated red blood cells (NRBC) count as a separate population out of white blood cells (WBC). The aim of this study was to investigate the analytical performances of NRBC enumeration on five top of the range HAs.
METHODS: We evaluated the within-run and between-day precision, limit of blank (LoB), limit of detection (LoD), and limit of quantitation (LoQ) of XE-2100 and XN-module (Sysmex), ADVIA 2120i (Siemens), BC-6800 (Mindray), and UniCel DxH 800 (Beckman Coulter). Automated NRBC counts were also compared with optical microscopy (OM).
RESULTS: The limits of detection for NRBC of the BC-6800, XN-module, XE-2100, UniCel DxH 800, and ADVIA 2120i are 0.035×109 /L, 0.019×109 /L, 0.067×109 /L, 0.038×109 /L, and 0.167×109 /L, respectively. Our data indicated excellent performance in terms of precision. The agreement with OM was excellent for BC-6800, XN-module, and XE-2100 (Bias 0.023, 0.019, and 0.033×109 /L, respectively). ADVIA 2120i displayed a significant constant error and UniCel DxH 800 both proportional and small constant error.
CONCLUSION: Regards to NRBC counting, the performances shown by BC-6800, XN-module, and XE-2100 are excellent also a low count, ADVIA 2120i and UniCel DxH 800 need to be improved.
© 2017 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  automated counting; blood cell count; erythroblasts; laboratory hematology; nucleated red blood cells

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28990291     DOI: 10.1111/ijlh.12722

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Lab Hematol        ISSN: 1751-5521            Impact factor:   2.877


  2 in total

Review 1.  The Blood Circulating Rare Cell Population. What is it and What is it Good For?

Authors:  Stefan Schreier; Wannapong Triampo
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2020-03-25       Impact factor: 6.600

2.  Prognostic Value of Nucleated RBCs for Patients With Suspected Sepsis in the Emergency Department: A Single-Center Prospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Erik K Amundsen; Christina Binde; Erik E Christensen; Olav Klingenberg; Dag Kvale; Aleksander R Holten
Journal:  Crit Care Explor       Date:  2021-07-16
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.