Literature DB >> 28990155

Treatment decisions and employment of breast cancer patients: Results of a population-based survey.

Reshma Jagsi1, Paul H Abrahamse2, Kamaria L Lee1, Lauren P Wallner3, Nancy K Janz4, Ann S Hamilton5, Kevin C Ward6, Monica Morrow7, Allison W Kurian8, Christopher R Friese9, Sarah T Hawley10, Steven J Katz11.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Many patients with breast cancer work for pay at the time of their diagnosis, and the treatment plan may threaten their livelihood. Understanding work experiences in a contemporary population-based sample is necessary to inform initiatives to reduce the burden of cancer care.
METHODS: Women who were 20 to 79 years old and had been diagnosed with stage 0 to II breast cancer, as reported to the Georgia and Los Angeles Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registries in 2014-2015, were surveyed. Of the 3672 eligible women, 2502 responded (68%); 1006 who reported working before their diagnosis were analyzed. Multivariate models evaluated correlates of missing work for >1 month and stopping work altogether versus missing work for ≤1 month.
RESULTS: In this diverse sample, most patients (62%) underwent lumpectomy; 16% underwent unilateral mastectomy (8% with reconstruction); and 23% underwent bilateral mastectomy (19% with reconstruction). One-third (33%) received chemotherapy. Most (84%) worked full-time before their diagnosis; however, only 50% had paid sick leave, 39% had disability benefits, and 38% had flexible work schedules. Surgical treatment was strongly correlated with missing >1 month of work (odds ratio [OR] for bilateral mastectomy with reconstruction vs lumpectomy, 7.8) and with stopping work altogether (OR for bilateral mastectomy with reconstruction vs lumpectomy, 3.1). Chemotherapy receipt (OR for missing >1 month, 1.3; OR for stopping work altogether, 3.9) and race (OR for missing >1 month for blacks vs whites, 2.0; OR for stopping work altogether for blacks vs whites, 1.7) also correlated. Those with paid sick leave were less likely to stop working (OR, 0.5), as were those with flexible schedules (OR, 0.3).
CONCLUSIONS: Working patients who received more aggressive treatments were more likely to experience substantial employment disruptions. Cancer 2017;123:4791-9.
© 2017 American Cancer Society. © 2017 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  breast cancer; chemotherapy; employment; job; mastectomy; work

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28990155      PMCID: PMC5716845          DOI: 10.1002/cncr.30959

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  23 in total

1.  Change in working time in a population-based cohort of patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  Marie Høyer; Karin Nordin; Johan Ahlgren; Leif Bergkvist; Mats Lambe; Birgitta Johansson; Claudia Lampic
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-07-09       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 2.  Responding to employment concerns of cancer survivors.

Authors:  Pamela Farley Short; Mary M Vargo
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-11-10       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Not working 3 years after breast cancer: predictors in a population-based study.

Authors:  Mélanie Drolet; Elizabeth Maunsell; Jacques Brisson; Chantal Brisson; Benoît Mâsse; Luc Deschênes
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-10-11       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 4.  Cancer survivors at work: a generation of progress.

Authors:  Barbara Hoffman
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 508.702

Review 5.  Factors reported to influence the return to work of cancer survivors: a literature review.

Authors:  Evelien R Spelten; Mirjam A G Sprangers; Jos H A M Verbeek
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2002 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.894

6.  Increasing use of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy for breast cancer patients: a trend toward more aggressive surgical treatment.

Authors:  Todd M Tuttle; Elizabeth B Habermann; Erin H Grund; Todd J Morris; Beth A Virnig
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-10-22       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Return to work after early-stage breast cancer: a cohort study into the effects of treatment and cancer-related symptoms.

Authors:  Fulya Balak; Corné A M Roelen; Petra C Koopmans; Elike E Ten Berge; Johan W Groothoff
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2008-08-01

8.  Factors influencing changes in employment among women with newly diagnosed breast cancer.

Authors:  Michael J Hassett; A James O'Malley; Nancy L Keating
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2009-06-15       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  The impact of sociodemographic, treatment, and work support on missed work after breast cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Mahasin S Mujahid; Nancy K Janz; Sarah T Hawley; Jennifer J Griggs; Ann S Hamilton; Steven J Katz
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2009-04-10       Impact factor: 4.872

10.  Trends in Reoperation After Initial Lumpectomy for Breast Cancer: Addressing Overtreatment in Surgical Management.

Authors:  Monica Morrow; Paul Abrahamse; Timothy P Hofer; Kevin C Ward; Ann S Hamilton; Allison W Kurian; Steven J Katz; Reshma Jagsi
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2017-10-01       Impact factor: 31.777

View more
  25 in total

1.  Decline in Racial Disparities in Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction: A Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Analysis from 1998 to 2014.

Authors:  Amanda R Sergesketter; Samantha M Thomas; Whitney O Lane; Jonah P Orr; Ronnie L Shammas; Oluwadamilola M Fayanju; Rachel A Greenup; Scott T Hollenbeck
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 4.730

2.  Patient-reported financial toxicity and adverse medical consequences in head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Whitney H Beeler; Emily L Bellile; Keith A Casper; Elizabeth Jaworski; Nicholas J Burger; Kelly M Malloy; Matthew E Spector; Andrew G Shuman; Andrew Rosko; Chaz L Stucken; Steven B Chinn; Aleksandar F Dragovic; Christina H Chapman; Dawn Owen; Shruti Jolly; Carol R Bradford; Mark E P Prince; Francis P Worden; Reshma Jagsi; Michelle L Mierzwa; Paul L Swiecicki
Journal:  Oral Oncol       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 5.337

3.  Insurance Coverage, Employment Status, and Financial Well-Being of Young Women Diagnosed with Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Florence K L Tangka; Sujha Subramanian; Madeleine Jones; Patrick Edwards; Timothy Flanigan; Yevgeniya Kaganova; Kevin W Smith; Cheryll C Thomas; Nikki A Hawkins; Juan Rodriguez; Temeika Fairley; Gery P Guy
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 4.254

4.  Employment trends in young women following a breast cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Shoshana M Rosenberg; Ines Vaz-Luis; Jingyi Gong; Padma Sheila Rajagopal; Kathryn J Ruddy; Rulla M Tamimi; Lidia Schapira; Steven Come; Virginia Borges; Janet S de Moor; Ann H Partridge
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2019-05-30       Impact factor: 4.872

5.  Financial Costs and Burden Related to Decisions for Breast Cancer Surgery.

Authors:  Rachel A Greenup; Christel Rushing; Laura Fish; Brittany M Campbell; Lisa Tolnitch; Terry Hyslop; Jeffrey Peppercorn; Stephanie B Wheeler; S Yousuf Zafar; Evan R Myers; E Shelley Hwang
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2019-07-29       Impact factor: 3.840

6.  Uptake, Results, and Outcomes of Germline Multiple-Gene Sequencing After Diagnosis of Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Allison W Kurian; Kevin C Ward; Ann S Hamilton; Dennis M Deapen; Paul Abrahamse; Irina Bondarenko; Yun Li; Sarah T Hawley; Monica Morrow; Reshma Jagsi; Steven J Katz
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 31.777

Review 7.  Impact of Cancer on Employment.

Authors:  Victoria S Blinder; Francesca M Gany
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-12-05       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 8.  Where advocacy meets patient-centered care-cost considerations in breast reconstruction decision-making.

Authors:  Whitney Lane; Brett T Phillips; Anaeze C Offodile
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2021-01

9.  A sequential explanatory study of the employment experiences of population-based breast, colorectal, and prostate cancer survivors.

Authors:  Shoshana Adler Jaffe; Dolores D Guest; Andrew L Sussman; Charles L Wiggins; Jessica Anderson; Jean A McDougall
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2021-06-27       Impact factor: 2.506

10.  Magnitude of reduction in risk of second contralateral breast cancer with bilateral mastectomy in patients with breast cancer: Data from California, 1998 through 2015.

Authors:  Allison W Kurian; Alison J Canchola; Cindy S Ma; Christina A Clarke; Scarlett L Gomez
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 6.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.