| Literature DB >> 28989588 |
Hossein Rahimi1, Mohammad Hadi Sadeghian2, Mohammad Reza Keramati2, Amir Hossein Jafarian2, Sepideh Shakeri3, Seyyede Fatemeh Shams3, Neda Motamedi3, Maryam Sheikhi3, Hossein Ayatollahi2.
Abstract
Background: Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is one of the most prevalent adult leukemias. This malignancy is known by lymphocytosis for a duration of more than 3 months. In fact, it is a heterogeneous clinical disease with changeable progression. Chromosomal aberrations are significant parameters to predict result and survival rate and find treatment strategies for each patient. Cytogenetic methods are known as sensitive and relatively new procedures to detect abnormalities in genome. Materials andEntities:
Keywords: Chromosomal aberration; Interphase FISH (I-FISH); Polymerase chain reaction (PCR); chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)
Year: 2017 PMID: 28989588 PMCID: PMC5625472
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Hematol Oncol Stem Cell Res ISSN: 2008-2207
laboratory finding of CCL patient in north east of Iran comparison to CI
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| M:10.93 | M: 11.50-15.80 |
|
| 160 | 4.40-11.30 |
|
| 182 | 172 -450 |
|
M: Male, F: Female, CI: Confidence interval
Fig1del 13q14,nucish(DLEU×1,13q34×2)[100]
Fig2del11q22,nucish (ATM×1,SE11×2)[100]
Fig3del 17p13, nucish(P53×1,SE17×2)[100]
Clinical, laboratory information of patients
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20 | 4 | 18 | 6 | Number |
| 53.50 | 63.20 | 65.33 | 63.00 | Median age |
| 20 | 4 | 12 | 2 | Male |
| 0 | 0 | 6 | 4 | Female |
| Rie staging | ||||
| 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 | 1 |
| 8 | 4 | 6 | 0 | 2 |
| 8 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 3 |
| 118.80 | 35.00 | 211.33 | 95.00 | WBC (¬103/mm3) |
| 107.00 | 110.00 | 105.00 | 130.00 | Hb (g/dl) |
| 10.62 | 13.00 | 10.60 | 11.00 | Plt (103/mm3) |
| 50.00 | 00.00 | 0.00 | 33.33 | Splenomegaly (%) |
| 10.00 | 00.00 | 11.11 | 100.00 | Axillary lymphadenopathy |
| 00.00 | 00.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | Ventral lymphadenopathy |
| 20.00 | 50.00 | 22.22 | 0.00 | Cervical lymphadenopathy |
Clinical findings of 22 CLL patients
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M | 60 | Del13q14 | Pos | Cervical | 89 | 210 |
|
| M | 59 | NO | Neg | Axillary | 65 | 190 |
|
| F | 65 | Del13q14 | Neg | Axillary | 95 | 130 |
|
| M | 60 | NO | Pos | Axillary & | 110 | 150 |
|
| M | 45 | NO | Neg | Neg | 150 | 230 |
|
| M | 50 | NO | Pos | Cervical | 150.2 | 110 |
|
| M | 71 | Del13q14 | Neg | Axillary | 450 | 80 |
|
| M | 56 | Del11q | Neg | Axillary | 35 | 135 |
|
| M | 55 | NO | Pos | Axillary & ventral | 130 | 220 |
|
| M | 53 | Del13q14 | Neg | Axillary | 161 | 175 |
|
| F | 67 | Del13q14 | Pos | Axillary | 157.5 | 179 |
|
| M | 62 | Del13q14 | Pos | Axillary | 85 | 190 |
|
| M | 55 | NO | Neg | Axillary | 69.2 | 183 |
|
| F | 61 | Del17q | Neg | Axillary | 92 | 137 |
|
| M | 57 | No | Pos | Axillary &ventral | 113 | 170 |
|
| M | 50 | No | Neg | No | 470 | 215 |
|
| M | 53 | No | Pos | Axillary | 142 | 100 |
|
| M | 53 | Del13q | Neg | Axillary | 138 | 75 |
|
| M | 53 | Del11q | Neg | Axillary& cervical | 100 | 155 |
|
| M | 58 | Pos | Axillary & ventral | 65 | 230 |
| |
| M | 59 | Del13q | Neg | Axillary &ventral | 159.4 | 182.5 |
|
| F | 63 | Del13q | Neg | Axillary | 159 | 191 |
|