Literature DB >> 28989587

High Prevalence of Vitamin D Deficiency in Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients and Its Adverse Outcome.

Fatere Seyedalipour1, Ava Mansouri2, Mohammad Vaezi3, Kheirollah Gholami1,2, Kazem Heidari2, Molouk Hadjibabaie1,2, Ardeshir Ghavamzadeh3.   

Abstract

Background: Although several studies have supported a preventive and therapeutic role of vitamin D (Vit D) for different types of cancers, we face insufficient documentation in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). So, we examined whether the serum calcidiol (25(OH)D) levels at the time of induction therapy have any impact on response and relapse in AML patients. Materials and
Methods: Blood samples were collected from 65 patients on days 0 and 28th of treatment to evaluate serum concentration of 25(OH)D and its effects on complete remission (CR) achievement, relapse rate and hospitalization length.
Results: Of the 65 patients who were included in the study, 38 were male (58.5%) and 27 were female (41.5%). Median age at the time of treatment was 37 years (range 15-68). 6% of the participants were older than 60 years. In regard to 25(OH)D levels, 81.5% of AML patients were deficient (levels <20 ng/ml). There was a significant difference in CR between patients with sufficient and deficient level of 25(OH)D. Deficient patients had longer length of hospitalization than those with sufficient levels. Also Vitamin D deficient patients had higher serum ALP levels. The mean level of 25(OH)D on treatment day 28th in our study was significantly lower than the baseline value.
Conclusion: The results of the study showed that serum 25(OH)D levels deficiency was highly prevalent among Iranian AML patients. Furthermore, higher Vit D levels in AML patients were associated with better outcome in these patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acute myeloid leukemia (AML); Relapse; Remission; Vitamin D

Year:  2017        PMID: 28989587      PMCID: PMC5625471     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Hematol Oncol Stem Cell Res        ISSN: 2008-2207


Introduction

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is caused by reduced capacity of myeloid precursors to differentiate into more mature cellular elements. Consequently, accumulation of leukemic blasts in the bone marrow causes reduction in the production of normal red blood cells, platelets, and mature granulocytes which leads to anemia, bleeding, and an increased risk of infection [1]-[3] . Eight major variants of AML are defined by the French-American-British (FAB) classification system based on morphologic characteristics (AML m0-7)[4]. AML-M3 also known as acute promyelocytic leukemia has different treatment from other AML subtypes   3 . After AML (non- m3) diagnosis, induction chemotherapy is given to clear the bone marrow and peripheral blood of all blast cells in order to regenerate normal blood cell components [5],[6] . Twenty to 30% of young adult patients and 50% of older adult patients with newly diagnosed AML will fail to attain a complete response (CR) with intensive induction chemotherapy as a result of drug resistance. In addition, a large percentage of patients who initially attain a CR will relapse. The therapy that provides the best chance for cure of patients with relapsed or refractory AML is allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation [7]-[9] . Vitamin D (Vit D) is a fat-soluble vitamin that is produced by the human skin (the major source of VitD) in response to solar ultraviolet-Bradiation (UVB) and very little amount supplied from the food[   10 ]. In addition to significant clinical role in skeletal health, Vit D potentially regulates many other cellular functions. Extra skeletal effects of Vit D on cellular differentiation, controlling proliferation, apoptosis and immune modulation have been demonstrated[11],[12]. Vit D is metabolized in the liver to 25-hydroxyVit D (25(OH)D),the major circulating metabolite- and further in the kidney, to 1,25-dihydroxyVit D (1,25(OH)2D), the bioactive form of Vit D. The measurement of 25(OH)D metabolite in serum is a clinical tool for determining Vit D status[   13 ]. Vit D deficiency is very common around the world. In the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES 2005-2006), 41.6 percent of adult participants (≥20 years) had 25(OH)D levels below 20 ng/mL [14],[15] . Epidemiologic studies have suggested an association between Vit D deficiency and AML [16]-[18] . In addition, in the early 1980s, in vitro data showed the ability of 1,25(OH)2D to differentiate AML cells into mature myeloid cells[   19 ]. Several studies have shown that low serum 25(OH)D levels were associated with inferior event-free survival and overall survival in diffuse large B- and T-cell lymphoma patients[   20 ] and decreased time until initiation of treatment in newly diagnosed chronic lymphoblastic leukemia (CLL) patients[   21 ]. The following values were used to classify Vit D status; Vit D deficiency for values of 20 ng/mL or less; Vit D insufficiency for values between 20.1 and 29.9 ng/mL, and normal state (Vit D sufficiency) for values of 30 ng/mL or above [11], [22] . Based on the above considerations, we prospectively tested the hypothesis that serum 25(OH)D levels prior to start of treatment have impact on response and relapse in patients diagnosed with AML.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study design The present study was designed as a prospective cohort study to determine (for the first time in Iran) the levels of 25(OH)D in Iranian AML-diagnosed population. This cohort was evaluated duringthe 1-year period between February 2015 and March 2016 at the Hematology, Oncology and Stem Cell Transplantation Research Center, Shariati Hospital affiliated with Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. The study protocol was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS), and followed the principles outlined by the Helsinki Declaration. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. Patients All new diagnosed AML patients above 15 years old admitted to the Hematology-Oncology Unit, Shariati Hospital between February 2015 and March 2016 were included in the study. Patients with AML-M3, patients with resistant or relapsed AML, secondary AML caused by cytotoxic drugs or radiotherapy and history of hematologic disease such as myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) or myeloproliferative disorder were excluded from the study. Finally, 65 patients were included in the study, and followed up 6 months after initiation of induction chemotherapy. Overview of treatment All AML patients received intensive first-line therapy with "7+3" regimens, which combined a 7-day continuous intravenous (IV) infusion of cytarabine (100 or 200 mg/m2/day) with an anthracycline (daunorubicin 90 mg/m²/day on days 1 to 3 as an IV bolus injection). The most commonly used anthracycline in this regimen was daunorubicin, but idarubicin might be used instead. The initial response to treatment was evaluated 7 to 10 days after the final doses of induction chemotherapy with a unilateral bone marrow aspirate and biopsy to demonstrate adequate marrow hypoplasia. A subsequent bone marrow exam was performed after recovery of neutrophils and platelets to document the remission status. Patients in complete remission (CR) received consolidation with "5+2" regimens (5 days cytarabine + 2 days daunorubicin at the same doses). Goal of treatment The traditional goal of treatment of AML was to produce and maintain a complete remission. The criteria for complete remission were platelet count higher than 100,000 cells/µL, neutrophil count higher than 1,000 cells/µL, and bone marrow specimen with less than 5% blasts[        23 ], which were evaluated on the 28th day of treatment. Then patients were followed for 6 months to assess relapse of disease. Serum 25(OH)D levels measurement Deficiencies in Vit D levels were neither assessed nor treated routinely.Two fasting venous blood samples (5 mL) were taken from each patient on the day before initiation of induction chemotherapy regimen and day 28 after treatment. Blood samples were centrifuged and serum extraction was done. Serum samples were then frozen immediately in -80°C and serum 25(OH)D concentrations were measured at the end of the study period. Serum 25(OH)D concentrations were measured by ELISA (immunodiagnostic System, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium). Samples were diluted with biotin-labeled 25(OH)D. The diluted samples were incubated in microtiter wells, which were coated with highly specific sheep 25(OH)D antibody for 2 hours at room temperature before aspiration and washing. Enzyme-labeled avidin was added and complexed selectively to biotin, then color was developed using a chromogenic substrate. The absorbance of the stopped reaction was read in a microtiter plate reader and color intensity was inversely proportional to the concentration of 25(OH)D. The patients were divided into two groups based on level of 25(OH)D (values < 20 ng/mL and values ≥ 20ng/ml). Data collection Baseline patients' demographic data, including sex, age, weight, height and type of AML were collected from the patients' medical records and databases. Laboratory parameters, including serum electrolytes (Na+, K+, Mg+2 and Ca+2), renal function tests (serum creatinine and urea), liver enzymes (Alanine aminotranspherase, Aspartate aminotranspherase and alkaline phosphatase) liver function indexes(serum albumin and Inter National Ratio (INR)) and molecular tests (WT1, FLT3) were also evaluated at the time of recruitment. Outcome parameters (i.e. Complete Blood Cell (CBC), leukemic blasts, hospitalization length and relapse) were collected. Outcome data Two serum concentrations of calcidiol (25(OH)D) were recorded for each patient (related to blood samples of days 0 and 28th of treatment) as the optimal indicator of Vit D status. The endpoints chosen for this study were: achieving a complete remission, relapse rate during 6 months, disease-free for six months (patients who attained complete remission with first induction therapy and did not relapse within 6 months) and the length of hospital stay within the period of 6 months. Hospitalization time was calculated as the number of days spent in the hospital during induction treatment and 6-month follow-up. Statistical analysis Statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences) version 21 software (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Continuous variables were presented as mean ± 0standard deviation (SD) or median (IQR). Categorical variables were reported as frequencies (percentages). Differences between two groups (Vit D deficient and sufficient) for continuous variables were tested using unpaired Student’s t-test or Mann-Whitney test according to the characteristics of the data distribution. Differences for categorical variables were analyzed with the chi-square and Fisher’s exact tests. Correlations were sought using the Pearson’s and Spearman’s coefficients for variables of normal and abnormal distributions, respectively. For all analyses, a two-sided p-value < 0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance.

Results

Of the 65 patients who were included in the study, 38 were male (58.5%) and 27 were female (41.5%). Median age at the time of treatment start was 37 years (range 15-68) and 6% of patients were older than 60 years. In regard to 25(OH)D levels, 53 (81.5%) of AML patients had levels <20 ng/ml, while 9 (13.8%) and 3 (4.7%) of patients had levels between 20.1 and 29.9 ng/mL and ≥30 ng/ml , respectively. In other terms, 95.3% of all evaluated AML patients showed suboptimal Vit D levels (<30 ng/ml). The mean of 25(OH)D levels in patient groups with deficiency was 10.47 ng/ml. Clinical and molecular characterization of the 65 AML patients enrolled in this study is summarized in Table 1 in terms of their 25(OH)D levels. The patients were divided into two groups based on level of 25(OH)D (values < 20 ng/mL and values ≥ 20ng/ml). No significant differences in age, gender or body mass index (BMI) were observed between patients with normal or low 25(OH)D levels. Moreover, molecular characteristics (FLT3 and WT1) were not different in two groups.
Table 1

Clinical characteristics of patients in regard to their serum 25(OH)D levels

Patient characteristics whole cohort N=65 Deficient (<20 ng/ml) N=53 (81.5%) Sufficient (≥20ng/ml) N=12 (18.5%) P
Mean age (years)37.6±13.635.8±12.345.3±17.00.09
Median age (years, range)37(15-68)36(15-64)47(17-68)
Gender
Male n (%)3832 (60.4)6 (50)0.51
Female n (%)2721 (39.6)6 (50)
BMI (kg/m2)24.223.925.50.33
FLT3 present n (%)16(24.6)14 (26.4)2 (16.7)0.71
WT1 mutated present n (%)58 (89.2)47 (88.7)11 (91.7)0.99
Serum calcium level (mg/dL)8.24±0.668.24±0.648.27±0.770.54
Serum phosphorus level (mg/dL)3.68±0.803.65±0.703.78±1.170.72
Serum magnesium level (mg/dL)1.88±0.231.89±0.2111.78±0.260.20
Serum sodium level (mg/dL)140.51±2.88140.41±2.62140.91±3.9100.69
Serum potassium level (mg/dL)3.98±0.394.03±0.363.77±0.500.17
Serum creatinine level (mg/dL)0.86±0.190.85±0.190.89±0.230.58
Blood urea concentration (mg/dL)13.61±4.5013.25±4.3515.33±4.990.11
Serum Albumin level (mg/dL)3.69±0.463.68±0.483.75±0.370.47
INR1.22±0.191.21±0.181.26±0.230.56
Serum ALT level (mg/dL)29.12±17.2429.34±18.0028.16±14.050.96
Serum AST level (mg/dL)24.83±11.1725.47±11.4322.00±9.900.42
Serum ALP level (mg/dL)174.07±79.07183.66±81.62131.75±49.880.04*
Hemoglobin g/dL8.57±1.798.57±1.798.53±1.890.71
Platelet count ×109/L63.13±84.4851.89±44.07112.83±170.410.44
WBC count ×109/L20.04±46.1225.20±50.1513.52±19.160.45

Lab data presented as mean ± Standard Deviation, 25(OH) D: 25 hydroxy vitamin D, ALT: Alanine aminotranspherase, AST: Aspartate aminotranspherase, BMI: Body mass index, ALP: Alkaline phosphatase, INR: International normalized ratio, WBC: White blood cell

Significant difference

There was no significant difference in the baseline clinical characteristics of patients with and without Vit D deficiency, except for alkaline phosphatase (ALP). Vit D deficient patients had higher serum ALP levels (P = 0.04). Two patients were excluded from study due to discontinuation of their treatment in the first week. Twenty-one patients (33.3%) had bone marrow specimen with more than 5% blasts on the day 28 of treatment and failed to achieve complete remission and 42 patients (66.7%) attained a complete remission (CR) with intensive induction chemotherapy. Of the 42 patients who had responded to initial treatment, 10 (23.8%) patients relapsed within 6 months. Serum 25(OH)D levels regarding the response rate, relapse, disease-free for 6 months and length of hospitalization have been shown in Table 2.
Table 2

Outcomes of patients in regard to their serum 25(OH)D levels

Characteristics of Patients whole cohort N=63 Deficient (<20 ng/ml) N=51 (81%) Sufficient (≥20ng/ml) N=12 (19%) P
Complete Remission n (%) 42(66.7)31(60.8)11(91.7)0.04#
Relapse* n (%)10 (23.8)8(25)2(18.1)0.9
Disease-free for 6 months n (%) 32(50.7)23(45.1)9(75)0.06
Median length of hospitalization(days, range)40 (22-74)44.5 (22-68)32.5 (24-74)0.04#

Relapse in patients with initial CR (from 42 patients),

significant difference

The mean level of 25(OH)D on the 28th day of treatment in our study was 12.8±8.5ng/ml which was lower than baseline (14.1±10.6ng/ml, P= 0.03). Clinical characteristics of patients in regard to their serum 25(OH)D levels Lab data presented as mean ± Standard Deviation, 25(OH) D: 25 hydroxy vitamin D, ALT: Alanine aminotranspherase, AST: Aspartate aminotranspherase, BMI: Body mass index, ALP: Alkaline phosphatase, INR: International normalized ratio, WBC: White blood cell Significant difference Outcomes of patients in regard to their serum 25(OH)D levels Relapse in patients with initial CR (from 42 patients), significant difference

Discussion

This is the first study that reports the incidence of Vit D deficiency in Iranian newly diagnosed AML (non M3) patients and evaluates its effects on response to induction chemotherapy, the relapse of the disease in patients and disease-free for 6 months. In this study, we found Vit D deficiency in most of the newly diagnosed AML (non M3) patients before the beginning of their intensive induction chemotherapy and on the 28th day of treatment. We also found that the levels of 25(OH)D are significantly correlated with poor outcome. Like other studies in healthy Iranian population and patients, we found that Vit D deficiency is more frequent in younger adults[24],[25]. In the Middle East, predisposing factors of Vit D deficiency are inadequate sun exposure, lack of Vit D food fortification program, clothing habit, skin type, polymorphism in Vit D receptor, and lack of supplementation[   26 ]. But, since the use of Vit D supplements has received considerable attention in recent years among the elderly population, they mostly have sufficient levels of Vit D[   25 ]. The median age at diagnosis of AML in previous studies was approximately 67 years[   27 ], while the median age registered in our study was 37 years and several other studies also reported the lower age of AML diagnosis in Iran [28], [29] . Looking at these two statements, we can draw the conclusion that there is a probable correlation between Vit D deficiency and AML occurrence in younger adults. Vit D deficiency has been reported to predispose individuals to increased risk of developing a number of cancers. Compelling epidemiological and experimental evidence support a role for Vit D in cancer prevention and treatment in many types of cancers[16]-[18], [30] . Several physiological and pathological conditions are related to an individual’s Vit D status. For example, chronic inflammatory conditions, liver and renal dysfunction and low serum albumin can affect 25(OH)D levels[   13 ]. These contributing factors have been ruled out by testing different lab parameters. In the present study, we have shown that baseline Vit D status before start of treatment is associated with the probability of CR attainment and CR rate is higher in patients with sufficient Vit D levels. In accordance with our study, several other studies demonstrated that low serum Vit D levels are associated with shorter survival in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and secondary oligoblastic AML[   31 ] and worse outcome in (non-hodgkin's lymphoma) NHL(20)and CLL[   21 ]. Also,a cohort of 97 newly diagnosed AML patients treated on similar protocols (7+3+3) showed that patients with subnormal 25(OH)D3 (<32ng/ml) had significantly worse progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared to those with normal 25(OH)D3 levels (≥32ng/ml)[32]. In vivo/in vitro studies as well as surveys of myeloid leukemia cell lines  have indicated that Vit D is generally capable of modulating several critical cellular processes, including inhibition of carcinogenesis by induction of cellular differentiation, inhibition of proliferation and promotion of apoptosis [33]-[37] . Vit D has other important effects such as the suppression of tumor angiogenesis, invasion and metastasis[   38 ]. A significant inverse relationship was found between 25(OH)D levels and length of hospital stay. Similar findings were reported in other studies in critically ill patients and low serum levels of 25(OH)D was associated with increased time of ICU stay [25],[39],[40] . Likewise, in Radujkovic et al’s. study, lower VitD levels were associated with significantly longer hospitalization during treatment with azathioprin in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome and secondary oligoblastic AML due to more febrile neutropenia episodes[   31 ]. Low serum 25(OH)D leads to systemic inflammatory response syndrome, nosocomial bloodstream, respiratory tract infections, acute kidney disease, metabolic dysfunction and all-cause mortality [41]-[43] , which may cause prolonged hospitalization. In addition, in our study, lower rate of CR in Vit D deficient group and consequently the need for more intensive chemotherapy drugs could be associated with prolonged length of hospitalization. Moreover, we have found that low levels of Vit D had significantly higher serum levels of ALP like other studies[   44 ]. Low 25(OH)D levels may be associated with secondary hyperparathyroidism and abnormal bone mineralization. Thus, increased levels of parathyroid hormone (PTH) and increased ALP levels should prompt suspicion of Vit D deficiency in some patients[   44 ]. Another significant finding in this study was the difference between baseline levels of Vit D and day 28th of treatment. In Fakih et al. study, chemotherapy was associated with a significant risk of severe Vit D deficiency in patients with colorectal cancer[   45 ]. It is plausible that patients undergoing chemotherapy less likely experience sunlight exposure, less able to absorb Vit D due to subclinical mucositis and less able to metabolize 25(OH)D into inactive compounds such as 24,25(OH)2Vit D through the activation of CYP3A4 or other metabolizing enzymes.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, we found that deficiency in serum 25(OH)D levels was highly prevalent in Iranian AML patients. Furthermore, higher Vit D level in AML patients was associated with its better outcome. This study can provide a rationale for the design of clinical trials with larger sample size in order to evaluate the benefits of Vit D supplementation in deficient AML patients.
  43 in total

Review 1.  Vitamin D deficiency.

Authors:  Michael F Holick
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-07-19       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  1 alpha,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3 induces differentiation of human myeloid leukemia cells.

Authors:  C Miyaura; E Abe; T Kuribayashi; H Tanaka; K Konno; Y Nishii; T Suda
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  1981-10-15       Impact factor: 3.575

3.  Prevalence and correlates of vitamin D deficiency in US adults.

Authors:  Kimberly Y Z Forrest; Wendy L Stuhldreher
Journal:  Nutr Res       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 4.  Vitamin D: Metabolism, Molecular Mechanism of Action, and Pleiotropic Effects.

Authors:  Sylvia Christakos; Puneet Dhawan; Annemieke Verstuyf; Lieve Verlinden; Geert Carmeliet
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 37.312

5.  Cognitive impairment, fatigue, and cytokine levels in patients with acute myelogenous leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome.

Authors:  Christina A Meyers; Maher Albitar; Elihu Estey
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2005-08-15       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Relationship between vitamin D status and ICU outcomes in veterans.

Authors:  Jason D McKinney; Beth A Bailey; Linda H Garrett; Prith Peiris; Todd Manning; Alan N Peiris
Journal:  J Am Med Dir Assoc       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 4.669

7.  A phase 3 study of three induction regimens and of priming with GM-CSF in older adults with acute myeloid leukemia: a trial by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group.

Authors:  Jacob M Rowe; Donna Neuberg; William Friedenberg; John M Bennett; Elisabeth Paietta; Adel Z Makary; Jane L Liesveld; Camille N Abboud; Gordon Dewald; F Ann Hayes; Martin S Tallman; Peter H Wiernik
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2003-09-25       Impact factor: 22.113

8.  Time from diagnosis to intensive chemotherapy initiation does not adversely impact the outcome of patients with acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Sarah Bertoli; Emilie Bérard; Françoise Huguet; Anne Huynh; Suzanne Tavitian; François Vergez; Sophie Dobbelstein; Nicole Dastugue; Véronique Mansat-De Mas; Eric Delabesse; Eliane Duchayne; Cécile Demur; Audrey Sarry; Valérie Lauwers-Cances; Guy Laurent; Michel Attal; Christian Récher
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 22.113

9.  Low 25(OH) vitamin D3 levels are associated with adverse outcome in newly diagnosed, intensively treated adult acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Hun Ju Lee; Josephia R Muindi; Wei Tan; Qiang Hu; Dan Wang; Song Liu; Gregory E Wilding; Laurie A Ford; Sheila N J Sait; Annemarie W Block; Araba A Adjei; Maurice Barcos; Elizabeth A Griffiths; James E Thompson; Eunice S Wang; Candace S Johnson; Donald L Trump; Meir Wetzler
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2013-10-25       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 10.  High prevalence of vitamin D inadequacy and implications for health.

Authors:  Michael F Holick
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 7.616

View more
  6 in total

1.  Influence of vitamin D on cancer risk and treatment: Why the variability?

Authors:  M Rita I Young; Ying Xiong
Journal:  Trends Cancer Res       Date:  2018

2.  Vitamin D and its receptor polymorphisms: New possible prognostic biomarkers in leukemias.

Authors:  Seyed Mohammad Sadegh Pezeshki; Ali Amin Asnafi; Abbas Khosravi; Mohammad Shahjahani; Shirin Azizidoost; Saeid Shahrabi
Journal:  Oncol Rev       Date:  2018-10-08

3.  Impact of vitamin D level at diagnosis and transplantation on the prognosis of hematological malignancy: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yusuke Ito; Akira Honda; Mineo Kurokawa
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2022-03-08

Review 4.  Targeting the Tumor Microenvironment in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: The Future of Immunotherapy and Natural Products.

Authors:  Christopher Hino; Bryan Pham; Daniel Park; Chieh Yang; Michael H K Nguyen; Simmer Kaur; Mark E Reeves; Yi Xu; Kevin Nishino; Lu Pu; Sue Min Kwon; Jiang F Zhong; Ke K Zhang; Linglin Xie; Esther G Chong; Chien-Shing Chen; Vinh Nguyen; Dan Ran Castillo; Huynh Cao
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2022-06-14

Review 5.  Vitamin D: Promises on the Horizon and Challenges Ahead for Fighting Pancreatic Cancer.

Authors:  Daoyan Wei; Liang Wang; Xiangsheng Zuo; Robert S Bresalier
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-31       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 6.  To D or not to D: vitamin D in hematopoietic cell transplantation.

Authors:  Sanghee Hong; Christina S Ferraro; Betty K Hamilton; Navneet S Majhail
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2020-04-25       Impact factor: 5.483

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.