Literature DB >> 28989545

A modified risk set approach to biomarker evaluation studies.

Debashis Ghosh1.   

Abstract

There is tremendous scientific and medical interest in the use of biomarkers to better facilitate medical decision making. In this article, we present a simple framework for assessing the predictive ability of a biomarker. The methodology requires use of techniques from a subfield of survival analysis termed semicompeting risks; results are presented to make the article self-contained. As we show in the article, one natural interpretation of semicompeting risks model is in terms of modifying the classical risk set approach to survival analysis that is more germane to medical decision making. A crucial parameter for evaluating biomarkers is the predictive hazard ratio, which is different from the usual hazard ratio from Cox regression models for right-censored data. This quantity will be defined; its estimation, inference and adjustment for covariates will be discussed. Aspects of causal inference related to these procedures will also be described. The methodology is illustrated with an evaluation of serum albumin in terms of predicting death in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Association; Causal Effect; Copula; Cross-ratio; Dependence; Diagnostics

Year:  2016        PMID: 28989545      PMCID: PMC5627622          DOI: 10.1007/s12561-016-9166-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Biosci        ISSN: 1867-1764


  16 in total

Review 1.  Biomarkers and surrogate endpoints: preferred definitions and conceptual framework.

Authors: 
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 6.875

Review 2.  Phases of biomarker development for early detection of cancer.

Authors:  M S Pepe; R Etzioni; Z Feng; J D Potter; M L Thompson; M Thornquist; M Winget; Y Yasui
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2001-07-18       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 3.  Limitations of the odds ratio in gauging the performance of a diagnostic, prognostic, or screening marker.

Authors:  Margaret Sullivan Pepe; Holly Janes; Gary Longton; Wendy Leisenring; Polly Newcomb
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2004-05-01       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  Semi-parametric inferences for association with semi-competing risks data.

Authors:  Debashis Ghosh
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2006-06-30       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 5.  Multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors.

Authors:  F E Harrell; K L Lee; D B Mark
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1996-02-28       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Meta-analysis for surrogacy: accelerated failure time models and semicompeting risks modeling.

Authors:  Debashis Ghosh; Jeremy M G Taylor; Daniel J Sargent
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2011-06-13       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Random-effects models for longitudinal data.

Authors:  N M Laird; J H Ware
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Evaluating serial cancer marker studies in patients at risk of recurrent disease.

Authors:  M H Gail
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Primary biliary cirrhosis: prediction of short-term survival based on repeated patient visits.

Authors:  P A Murtaugh; E R Dickson; G M Van Dam; M Malinchoc; P M Grambsch; A L Langworthy; C H Gips
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 17.425

10.  Markers for early detection of cancer: statistical guidelines for nested case-control studies.

Authors:  Stuart G Baker; Barnett S Kramer; Sudhir Srivastava
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2002-02-28       Impact factor: 4.615

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.