Literature DB >> 28989492

Encouraging practitioners in infection prevention and control to publish: a cross-sectional survey.

Lynn Melone1, Lesley Price1, Jennie Wilson2.   

Abstract

AIM: The aim of this cross-sectional survey was to determine the views of infection prevention and control practitioners (IPCPs) on publishing research.
METHODS: A convenience sample was obtained by approaching delegates at the 2015 Infection Prevention Society conference and data were captured via a hand-held electronic device.
FINDINGS: Of the 79 respondents, most (83%) read the Journal of Infection Prevention (JIP) and found it useful for informing their practice (72%). However, most (91%) had never published in JIP, and less than half (40%) published elsewhere. The main barrier to publication was not having work suitable for publication (38%). Support (37%), training in writing for publication (10%) and time (9%) were considered to be important facilitators in encouraging respondents to publish. DISCUSSION: Strategies that support IPCPs in developing their writing skills may encourage more IPCPs to disseminate evidence to support best practice by publishing their work in peer-reviewed journals.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Barriers and facilitators; writing for publication

Year:  2016        PMID: 28989492      PMCID: PMC5102086          DOI: 10.1177/1757177416663838

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Infect Prev        ISSN: 1757-1782


  10 in total

1.  Facilitating writing by practitioners: survey of practitioners who have published.

Authors:  Marlys M Staudt; Catherine Dulmus; Guy A Bennett
Journal:  Soc Work       Date:  2003-01

Review 2.  How to get published: seven easy steps.

Authors:  John W Albarran; Julie Scholes
Journal:  Nurs Crit Care       Date:  2005 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.325

3.  Writing for publication: pressures, barriers and support strategies.

Authors:  Adam Keen
Journal:  Nurse Educ Today       Date:  2006-08-14       Impact factor: 3.442

4.  Writing for publication in medical education: the benefits of a faculty development workshop and peer writing group.

Authors:  Yvonne Steinert; Peter J McLeod; Stephen Liben; Linda Snell
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.650

5.  Writing for publication: perspectives of graduate nursing students and doctorally prepared faculty.

Authors:  Donna A Dowling; Carol Savrin; Gregory C Graham
Journal:  J Nurs Educ       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 1.726

6.  Writing for publication.

Authors:  M M Lawrence; M A Folcik
Journal:  J Nurs Staff Dev       Date:  1996 Nov-Dec

7.  Writing for publication made easy for nurses: an evaluation.

Authors:  Annette Richardson; Debbie Carrick-Sen
Journal:  Br J Nurs       Date:  2011 Jun 24-Jul 7

Review 8.  Getting published: reflections of a collaborative writing group.

Authors:  Valerie Ness; Kathleen Duffy; Jacqueline McCallum; Lesley Price
Journal:  Nurse Educ Today       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 3.442

9.  A survey of midwives' attitudes to, and involvement in, research: the first stage in identifying needs for a staff development programme.

Authors:  C Hicks
Journal:  Midwifery       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 2.372

10.  Supporting academic publication: evaluation of a writing course combined with writers' support group.

Authors:  Claire M Rickard; Matthew R McGrail; Rebecca Jones; Peter O'Meara; Anske Robinson; Mollie Burley; Gillian Ray-Barruel
Journal:  Nurse Educ Today       Date:  2008-12-25       Impact factor: 3.442

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.