Irene Thompson1, Colin Lavelle1, Laurence Leonard2. 1. Infection Prevention and Control, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Foyer, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast, UK. 2. School of Nursing and Midwifery, Queens University Belfast, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Clostridium difficile (C. difficile) is a leading cause of infectious diarrhoea in hospitals. Sending faecal samples for testing expedites diagnosis and appropriate treatment. Clinical suspicion of C. difficile based on patient history, signs and symptoms is the basis for sampling. Sending faecal samples from patients with diarrhoea 'just in case' the patient has C. difficile may be an indication of poor clinical management. AIM: To evaluate the effectiveness of an intervention by an Infection Prevention and Control Team (IPCT) in reducing inappropriate faecal samples sent for C. difficile testing. METHOD: An audit of numbers of faecal samples sent before and after a decision-making algorithm was introduced. The number of samples received in the laboratory was retrospectively counted for 12-week periods before and after an algorithm was introduced. FINDINGS: There was a statistically significant reduction in the mean number of faecal samples sent post the algorithm. Results were compared to a similar intervention carried out in 2009 in which the same message was delivered by a memorandum. In 2009 the memorandum had no effect on the overall number of weekly samples being sent. CONCLUSION: An algorithm intervention had an effect on the number of faecal samples being sent for C. difficile testing and thus contributed to the effective use of the laboratory service.
BACKGROUND:Clostridium difficile (C. difficile) is a leading cause of infectious diarrhoea in hospitals. Sending faecal samples for testing expedites diagnosis and appropriate treatment. Clinical suspicion of C. difficile based on patient history, signs and symptoms is the basis for sampling. Sending faecal samples from patients with diarrhoea 'just in case' the patient has C. difficile may be an indication of poor clinical management. AIM: To evaluate the effectiveness of an intervention by an Infection Prevention and Control Team (IPCT) in reducing inappropriate faecal samples sent for C. difficile testing. METHOD: An audit of numbers of faecal samples sent before and after a decision-making algorithm was introduced. The number of samples received in the laboratory was retrospectively counted for 12-week periods before and after an algorithm was introduced. FINDINGS: There was a statistically significant reduction in the mean number of faecal samples sent post the algorithm. Results were compared to a similar intervention carried out in 2009 in which the same message was delivered by a memorandum. In 2009 the memorandum had no effect on the overall number of weekly samples being sent. CONCLUSION: An algorithm intervention had an effect on the number of faecal samples being sent for C. difficile testing and thus contributed to the effective use of the laboratory service.
Authors: Katherine Schultz; Emily Sickbert-Bennett; Ashley Marx; David J Weber; Lauren M DiBiase; Stacy Campbell-Bright; Lauren E Bode; Mike Baker; Tom Belhorn; Mark Buchanan; Sherie Goldbach; Jacci Harden; Emily Hoke; Beth Huenniger; Jonathan J Juliano; Michael Langston; Heather Ritchie; William A Rutala; Jason Smith; Shelley Summerlin-Long; Lisa Teal; Peter Gilligan Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2018-08-27 Impact factor: 5.948