Abrar Ahmad Chughtai1, C Raina MacIntyre2, Yang Zheng3, Quanyi Wang3, Zafar Iqbal Toor4, Tham Chi Dung5, Nguyen Tran Hien5, Holly Seale6. 1. School of Public Health & Community Medicine, UNSW Medicine, University of New South Wales, Australia. 2. School of Public Health and Community Medicine, UNSW Medicine, University of New South Wales, Australia and National Centre for Immunization Research and Surveillance of Vaccine Preventable Diseases (NCIRS), The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Australia. 3. The Beijing Center for Disease Prevention and Control (CDC), Beijing, China. 4. National TB Control Program (NTP), Ministry of Health, Pakistan. 5. National Institute of Hygiene and Epidemiology (NIHE), Hanoi, Vietnam. 6. School of Public Health and Community Medicine, UNSW Medicine, University of New South Wales, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There is an ongoing debate regarding the type of respiratory protection that should be recommended for use for healthcare workers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was conducted in three countries: China, Pakistan and Vietnam. RESULTS: In China and Pakistan, the infection control guidelines were developed to be in line with the recommendations from the World Health Organization (WHO) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, while in the Vietnamese guidelines the recommendations correspond with the WHO suggestions only. The guidelines from all three countries document the need for training and fit testing; however there is no system to monitor the training and fit testing programs. Across the three countries, there was some inconsistency with regard to the types of products (i.e. masks vs. respirators) recommended for influenza, severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) and tuberculosis. CONCLUSIONS: Available evidence should be examined and a comprehensive policy should be developed on the use of masks and respirators. The policy should address critical areas such as regulation, training, fit testing and reuse.
BACKGROUND: There is an ongoing debate regarding the type of respiratory protection that should be recommended for use for healthcare workers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was conducted in three countries: China, Pakistan and Vietnam. RESULTS: In China and Pakistan, the infection control guidelines were developed to be in line with the recommendations from the World Health Organization (WHO) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, while in the Vietnamese guidelines the recommendations correspond with the WHO suggestions only. The guidelines from all three countries document the need for training and fit testing; however there is no system to monitor the training and fit testing programs. Across the three countries, there was some inconsistency with regard to the types of products (i.e. masks vs. respirators) recommended for influenza, severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) and tuberculosis. CONCLUSIONS: Available evidence should be examined and a comprehensive policy should be developed on the use of masks and respirators. The policy should address critical areas such as regulation, training, fit testing and reuse.
Entities:
Keywords:
Healthcare-associated infections; infection control; infectious diseases; public health
Authors: Robert B Lawrence; Matthew G Duling; Catherine A Calvert; Christopher C Coffey Journal: J Occup Environ Hyg Date: 2006-09 Impact factor: 2.155
Authors: B Dimitrova; A Hutchings; R Atun; F Drobniewski; G Marchenko; S Zakharova; I Fedorin; R J Coker Journal: Int J Tuberc Lung Dis Date: 2005-01 Impact factor: 2.373
Authors: Katy-Anne Thompson; John V Pappachan; Allan M Bennett; Himanshu Mittal; Susan Macken; Brian K Dove; Jonathan S Nguyen-Van-Tam; Vicky R Copley; Sarah O'Brien; Peter Hoffman; Simon Parks; Andrew Bentley; Barbara Isalska; Gail Thomson Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-02-13 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Donald K Milton; M Patricia Fabian; Benjamin J Cowling; Michael L Grantham; James J McDevitt Journal: PLoS Pathog Date: 2013-03-07 Impact factor: 6.823
Authors: Dang Ha Le; Sharon A Bloom; Quang Hien Nguyen; Susan A Maloney; Quynh Mai Le; Katrin C Leitmeyer; Huy Anh Bach; Mary G Reynolds; Joel M Montgomery; James A Comer; Peter W Horby; Aileen J Plant Journal: Emerg Infect Dis Date: 2004-02 Impact factor: 6.883
Authors: C R Macintyre; H Seale; P Yang; Y Zhang; W Shi; A Almatroudi; A Moa; X Wang; X Li; X Pang; Q Wang Journal: Epidemiol Infect Date: 2013-12-05 Impact factor: 2.451