Literature DB >> 28989342

Experimental Investigation on Minimum Frame Rate Requirements of High-Speed Videoendoscopy for Clinical Voice Assessment.

Dimitar D Deliyski1,2,3,4, Maria Eg Powell2,4, Stephanie Rc Zacharias2,4,5, Terri Treman Gerlach6, Alessandro de Alarcon1,3.   

Abstract

This study investigated the impact of high-speed videoendoscopy (HSV) frame rates on the assessment of nine clinically-relevant vocal-fold vibratory features. Fourteen adult patients with voice disorder and 14 adult normal controls were recorded using monochromatic rigid HSV at a rate of 16000 frames per second (fps) and spatial resolution of 639×639 pixels. The 16000-fps data were downsampled to 16 other rate denominations. Using paired comparisons design, nine common clinical vibratory features were visually compared between the downsampled and the original images. Three raters reported the thresholds at which: (1) a detectable difference between the two videos was first noticed, and (2) differences between the two videos would result in a change of clinical rating. Results indicated that glottal edge, mucosal wave magnitude and extent, aperiodicity, contact and loss of contact of the vocal folds were the vibratory features most sensitive to frame rate. Of these vibratory features, the glottal edge was selected for further analysis, due to its higher rating reliability, universal prevalence and consistent definition. Rates of 8000 fps were found to be free from visually-perceivable feature degradation, and for rates of 5333 fps, degradation was minimal. For rates of 4000 fps and higher, clinical assessments of glottal edge were not affected. Rates of 2000 fps changed the clinical ratings in over 16% of the samples, which could lead to inaccurate functional assessment.

Entities:  

Keywords:  clinical voice assessment; frame rate; high-speed videoendoscopy; laryngeal imaging

Year:  2014        PMID: 28989342      PMCID: PMC5630145          DOI: 10.1016/j.bspc.2014.11.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomed Signal Process Control        ISSN: 1746-8094            Impact factor:   3.880


  6 in total

1.  Commentary on why laryngeal stroboscopy really works: clarifying misconceptions surrounding Talbot's law and the persistence of vision.

Authors:  Daryush D Mehta; Dimitar D Deliyski; Robert E Hillman
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Mucosal wave: a normophonic study across visualization techniques.

Authors:  Heather S Shaw; Dimitar D Deliyski
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2006-10-02       Impact factor: 2.009

3.  Clinical implementation of laryngeal high-speed videoendoscopy: challenges and evolution.

Authors:  Dimitar D Deliyski; Pencho P Petrushev; Heather Shaw Bonilha; Terri Treman Gerlach; Bonnie Martin-Harris; Robert E Hillman
Journal:  Folia Phoniatr Logop       Date:  2007-11-30       Impact factor: 0.849

4.  Videokymography in voice disorders: what to look for?

Authors:  Jan G Svec; Frantisek Sram; Harm K Schutte
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 1.547

5.  Videokymography: high-speed line scanning of vocal fold vibration.

Authors:  J G Svec; H K Schutte
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 2.009

6.  Mitigation of temporal aliasing via harmonic modeling of laryngeal waveforms in high-speed videoendoscopy.

Authors:  Takeshi Ikuma; Melda Kunduk; Andrew J McWhorter
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.840

  6 in total
  11 in total

1.  Adductory Vocal Fold Kinematic Trajectories During Conventional Versus High-Speed Videoendoscopy.

Authors:  Manuel Diaz-Cadiz; Victoria S McKenna; Jennifer M Vojtech; Cara E Stepp
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2019-06-10       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Visualizing the movement of the contact between vocal folds during vibration by using array-based transmission ultrasonic glottography.

Authors:  Bowen Jing; Pengju Chigan; Zhengtong Ge; Liang Wu; Supin Wang; Mingxi Wan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  The effect of high-speed videoendoscopy configuration on reduced-order model parameter estimates by Bayesian inference.

Authors:  Jonathan J Deng; Paul J Hadwin; Sean D Peterson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Utility of Laryngeal High-speed Videoendoscopy in Clinical Voice Assessment.

Authors:  Stephanie R C Zacharias; Dimitar D Deliyski; Terri Treman Gerlach
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 2.009

5.  Temporal Segmentation for Laryngeal High-Speed Videoendoscopy in Connected Speech.

Authors:  Maryam Naghibolhosseini; Dimitar D Deliyski; Stephanie R C Zacharias; Alessandro de Alarcon; Robert F Orlikoff
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 2.009

6.  Efficacy of Videostroboscopy and High-Speed Videoendoscopy to Obtain Functional Outcomes From Perioperative Ratings in Patients With Vocal Fold Mass Lesions.

Authors:  Maria E Powell; Dimitar D Deliyski; Steven M Zeitels; James A Burns; Robert E Hillman; Terri Treman Gerlach; Daryush D Mehta
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2019-04-17       Impact factor: 2.009

7.  Spatial Segmentation for Laryngeal High-Speed Videoendoscopy in Connected Speech.

Authors:  Ahmed M Yousef; Dimitar D Deliyski; Stephanie R C Zacharias; Alessandro de Alarcon; Robert F Orlikoff; Maryam Naghibolhosseini
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2020-11-27       Impact factor: 2.300

8.  Detection of Vocal Fold Image Obstructions in High-Speed Videoendoscopy During Connected Speech in Adductor Spasmodic Dysphonia: A Convolutional Neural Networks Approach.

Authors:  Ahmed M Yousef; Dimitar D Deliyski; Stephanie R C Zacharias; Maryam Naghibolhosseini
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 2.300

9.  Comparison of Videostroboscopy to Stroboscopy Derived From High-Speed Videoendoscopy for Evaluating Patients With Vocal Fold Mass Lesions.

Authors:  Maria E Powell; Dimitar D Deliyski; Robert E Hillman; Steven M Zeitels; James A Burns; Daryush D Mehta
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 2.408

10.  Impact of Subharmonic and Aperiodic Laryngeal Dynamics on the Phonatory Process Analyzed in Ex Vivo Rabbit Models.

Authors:  Fabian Thornton; Michael Döllinger; Stefan Kniesburges; David Berry; Christoph Alexiou; Anne Schützenberger
Journal:  Appl Sci (Basel)       Date:  2019-05-13       Impact factor: 2.679

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.