Literature DB >> 28988826

Clinical diagnostic tools for vitamin D assessment.

Iltaf Shah1, M Kalim Akhtar2, Soleiman Hisaindee2, Muhammad A Rauf2, Mohammed Sadig2, S Salman Ashraf2.   

Abstract

Vitamin D deficiency has been implicated in a plethora of diseases including rheumatoid arthritis, Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's disease, and osteoporosis. Deficiency of this vitamin is a global epidemic affecting both developing and developed nations. Within a clinical context, the qualitative and quantitative analysis of vitamin D is therefore vital. The main metabolic markers for assessing vitamin D status in humans are the hydroxylated forms of vitamin D, 25OHD3 and 25OHD2 on account of their long half-lives within the body and excellent stability. An adequate level for healthy individuals of these hydroxylated forms is estimated to be around 20-40ng/ml of blood. There are three main analytical techniques for determining the levels of 25OHD3 and 25OHD2. The first technique is immunoassay-based and can be performed in a rapid, high throughput, automated manner, allowing as many as 240 tests per hour with the duration of each assay as little as 18min. Furthermore, it offers excellent sensitivity with a detection range of 3.4-156ng/ml. A major downside of immunoassays is that they are unable to distinguish between the various forms of vitamin D. While HPLC is a highthroughput low cost instrument it is not a very sensitive technique and cannot quantify the down stream metabolites of vitamin D. The third technique, namely liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS/), provides excellent sensitivity with a wide dynamic range from 0.068pg/ml to 100ng/ml. Additionally, it offers a high level of separation and permits identification of vitamin D-related metabolites. However, a huge limitation with LC/MS/MS is their poor throughput for sample analyses. As yet, there is no analytical technique which combines the fine detection capabilities of LC/MS/MS and the rapid, automated format of immunoassay, for vitamin D analyses. Future attention therefore needs to be given to this area if the current clinical diagnostic tools for vitamin D analysis are to be further improved.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  HPLC; Immunoassays; LC/MS/MS; Vitamin D

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28988826     DOI: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2017.10.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol        ISSN: 0960-0760            Impact factor:   4.292


  11 in total

1.  Comparison of vitamin D metabolites in wild and captive baboons.

Authors:  Toni E Ziegler; Amita Kapoor; Neil C Binkley; Karen S Rice; Jeffrey Rogers; Clifford J Jolly; Jane E Phillips-Conroy
Journal:  Am J Primatol       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 2.371

2.  Vitamin D Status Assessment: Lack of Correlation between Serum and Hair 25-Hydroxycholecalciferol Levels in Healthy Young Adults.

Authors:  Zsolt Gáll; Brigitta Csukor; Melinda Urkon; Lénárd Farczádi; Melinda Kolcsár
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-14

Review 3.  The serum vitamin D metabolome: What we know and what is still to discover.

Authors:  Robert C Tuckey; Chloe Y S Cheng; Andrzej T Slominski
Journal:  J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2018-09-08       Impact factor: 4.292

Review 4.  Role of Vitamin D in Cognitive Dysfunction: New Molecular Concepts and Discrepancies between Animal and Human Findings.

Authors:  Zsolt Gáll; Orsolya Székely
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-10-20       Impact factor: 5.717

5.  A Non-Invasive Hair Test to Determine Vitamin D3 Levels.

Authors:  Iltaf Shah; Mohammad Mansour; Sheikh Jobe; Emadaldeen Salih; Declan Naughton; Syed Salman Ashraf
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 4.411

6.  Association Between Serum Vitamin D Levels and Parkinson's Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Xiaoyue Luo; Ruwei Ou; Rajib Dutta; Yuan Tian; Hai Xiong; Huifang Shang
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 4.003

7.  Differential Impact of Serum 25-Hydroxyvitamin D3 Levels on the Prognosis of Patients with Liver Cirrhosis According to MELD and Child-Pugh Scores.

Authors:  Tae Hyung Kim; Seung Gyu Yun; Jimi Choi; Hyun Gil Goh; Han Ah Lee; Sun Young Yim; Seong Ji Choi; Young Sun Lee; Eileen L Yoon; Young Kul Jung; Yeon Seok Seo; Ji Hoon Kim; Hyung Joon Yim; Jong Eun Yeon; Kwan Soo Byun; Soon Ho Um
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 2.153

Review 8.  Epimers of Vitamin D: A Review.

Authors:  Bashar Al-Zohily; Asma Al-Menhali; Salah Gariballa; Afrozul Haq; Iltaf Shah
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-01-11       Impact factor: 5.923

9.  Vitamin D Status in Children With Short Stature: Accurate Determination of Serum Vitamin D Components Using High-Performance Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry.

Authors:  Bei Xu; Yue Feng; Lingling Gan; Yamei Zhang; Wenqiang Jiang; Jiafu Feng; Lin Yu
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-10-13       Impact factor: 5.555

10.  Cytoprotective Effect of Vitamin D on Doxorubicin-Induced Cardiac Toxicity in Triple Negative Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Kevin J Lee; Griffin Wright; Hannah Bryant; Leigh Ann Wiggins; Valeria L Dal Zotto; Michele Schuler; Christopher Malozzi; Michael V Cohen; Natalie R Gassman
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-07-12       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.