Hanna Boogaard1, Annemoon M van Erp2, Katherine D Walker2, Rashid Shaikh2. 1. Health Effects Institute, 75 Federal Street, Suite 1400, Boston, MA, 02110-1817, USA. jboogaard@healtheffects.org. 2. Health Effects Institute, 75 Federal Street, Suite 1400, Boston, MA, 02110-1817, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Assessing health effects of air quality interventions is of ever-increasing interest. Given the prominent role Health Effects Institute (HEI) has played in accountability research, this review focuses on HEI's recent experiences, the challenges it has encountered, and provides possible directions for future research. RECENT FINDINGS: Most accountability studies to date have focused on effects of relatively short-term, local-scale, and sometimes temporary interventions. Only a few recent accountability studies have sought to investigate large-scale, multiyear regulatory programs. Common challenges encountered include lack of statistical power, how to account appropriately for background trends in air quality and health, and difficulties in direct attribution of changes in air pollution and health to a single intervention among many regulatory actions. New methods have been developed for accountability research that has shown promise addressing some of those challenges, including use of causal inference methods. These and other approaches that would enhance the attribution of changes in air quality and health directly to an intervention should continue to be further explored. In addition, integration of social and behavioral sciences in accountability research is warranted, and climate related co-benefits and dis-benefits may be considered.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Assessing health effects of air quality interventions is of ever-increasing interest. Given the prominent role Health Effects Institute (HEI) has played in accountability research, this review focuses on HEI's recent experiences, the challenges it has encountered, and provides possible directions for future research. RECENT FINDINGS: Most accountability studies to date have focused on effects of relatively short-term, local-scale, and sometimes temporary interventions. Only a few recent accountability studies have sought to investigate large-scale, multiyear regulatory programs. Common challenges encountered include lack of statistical power, how to account appropriately for background trends in air quality and health, and difficulties in direct attribution of changes in air pollution and health to a single intervention among many regulatory actions. New methods have been developed for accountability research that has shown promise addressing some of those challenges, including use of causal inference methods. These and other approaches that would enhance the attribution of changes in air quality and health directly to an intervention should continue to be further explored. In addition, integration of social and behavioral sciences in accountability research is warranted, and climate related co-benefits and dis-benefits may be considered.
Keywords:
Accountability; Actions; Air pollution; Health; Interventions; Regulations
Authors: Frank Kelly; H Ross Anderson; Ben Armstrong; Richard Atkinson; Ben Barratt; Sean Beevers; Dick Derwent; David Green; Ian Mudway; Paul Wilkinson Journal: Res Rep Health Eff Inst Date: 2011-04
Authors: Douglas W Dockery; David Q Rich; Patrick G Goodman; Luke Clancy; Pamela Ohman-Strickland; Prethibha George; Tania Kotlov Journal: Res Rep Health Eff Inst Date: 2013-07
Authors: Susann Henschel; Richard Atkinson; Ariana Zeka; Alain Le Tertre; Antonis Analitis; Klea Katsouyanni; Olivier Chanel; Mathilde Pascal; Bertil Forsberg; Sylvia Medina; Patrick G Goodman Journal: Int J Public Health Date: 2012-05-17 Impact factor: 3.380
Authors: Luisa V Giles; Prabjit Barn; Nino Künzli; Isabelle Romieu; Murray A Mittleman; Stephan van Eeden; Ryan Allen; Chris Carlsten; Dave Stieb; Curtis Noonan; Audrey Smargiassi; Joel D Kaufman; Shakoor Hajat; Tom Kosatsky; Michael Brauer Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2010-08-20 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Jacob Burns; Hanna Boogaard; Stephanie Polus; Lisa M Pfadenhauer; Anke C Rohwer; Annemoon M van Erp; Ruth Turley; Eva Rehfuess Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2019-05-20
Authors: Jacob Burns; Sabine Hoffmann; Christoph Kurz; Michael Laxy; Stephanie Polus; Eva Rehfuess Journal: Atmos Environ (1994) Date: 2020-11-22 Impact factor: 4.798
Authors: Jaime Benavides; Sebastian T Rowland; Jenni A Shearston; Yanelli Nunez; Darby W Jack; Marianthi-Anna Kioumourtzoglou Journal: Curr Environ Health Rep Date: 2022-04-07