Souzana Achilleos1, Marianthi-Anna Kioumourtzoglou2, Chih-Da Wu3, Joel D Schwartz4, Petros Koutrakis5, Stefania I Papatheodorou6. 1. Department of Environmental Health, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA. Electronic address: soa080@mail.harvard.edu. 2. Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY, USA. 3. Department of Forestry and Natural Resources, National Chiayi University, Chiayi, Taiwan. 4. Department of Environmental Health, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA. 5. Department of Environmental Health, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA. 6. Cyprus International Institute for Environmental and Public Health, Cyprus University of Technology, Limassol, Cyprus.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The link between PM2.5 exposure and adverse health outcomes is well documented from studies across the world. However, the reported effect estimates vary across studies, locations and constituents. We aimed to conduct a meta-analysis on associations between short-term exposure to PM2.5 constituents and mortality using city-specific estimates, and explore factors that may explain some of the observed heterogeneity. METHODS: We systematically reviewed epidemiological studies on particle constituents and mortality using PubMed and Web of Science databases up to July 2015.We included studies that examined the association between short-term exposure to PM2.5 constituents and all-cause, cardiovascular, and respiratory mortality, in the general adult population. Each study was summarized based on pre-specified study key parameters (e.g., location, time period, population, diagnostic classification standard), and we evaluated the risk of bias using the Office of Health Assessment and Translation (OHAT) Method for each included study. We extracted city-specific mortality risk estimates for each constituent and cause of mortality. For multi-city studies, we requested the city-specific risk estimates from the authors unless reported in the article. We performed random effects meta-analyses using city-specific estimates, and examined whether the effects vary across regions and city characteristics (PM2.5 concentration levels, air temperature, elevation, vegetation, size of elderly population, population density, and baseline mortality). RESULTS: We found a 0.89% (95% CI: 0.68, 1.10%) increase in all-cause, a 0.80% (95% CI: 0.41, 1.20%) increase in cardiovascular, and a 1.10% (95% CI: 0.59, 1.62%) increase in respiratory mortality per 10μg/m3 increase in PM2.5. Accounting for the downward bias induced by studies of single days, the all-cause mortality estimate increased to 1.01% (95% CI: 0.81, 1.20%). We found significant associations between mortality and several PM2.5 constituents. The most consistent and stronger associations were observed for elemental carbon (EC) and potassium (K). For most of the constituents, we observed high variability of effect estimates across cities. CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis suggests that (a) combustion elements such as EC and K have a stronger association with mortality, (b) single lag studies underestimate effects, and (c) estimates of PM2.5 and constituents differ across regions. Accounting for PM mass in constituent's health models may lead to more stable and comparable effect estimates across different studies. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO: CRD42017055765.
BACKGROUND: The link between PM2.5 exposure and adverse health outcomes is well documented from studies across the world. However, the reported effect estimates vary across studies, locations and constituents. We aimed to conduct a meta-analysis on associations between short-term exposure to PM2.5 constituents and mortality using city-specific estimates, and explore factors that may explain some of the observed heterogeneity. METHODS: We systematically reviewed epidemiological studies on particle constituents and mortality using PubMed and Web of Science databases up to July 2015.We included studies that examined the association between short-term exposure to PM2.5 constituents and all-cause, cardiovascular, and respiratory mortality, in the general adult population. Each study was summarized based on pre-specified study key parameters (e.g., location, time period, population, diagnostic classification standard), and we evaluated the risk of bias using the Office of Health Assessment and Translation (OHAT) Method for each included study. We extracted city-specific mortality risk estimates for each constituent and cause of mortality. For multi-city studies, we requested the city-specific risk estimates from the authors unless reported in the article. We performed random effects meta-analyses using city-specific estimates, and examined whether the effects vary across regions and city characteristics (PM2.5 concentration levels, air temperature, elevation, vegetation, size of elderly population, population density, and baseline mortality). RESULTS: We found a 0.89% (95% CI: 0.68, 1.10%) increase in all-cause, a 0.80% (95% CI: 0.41, 1.20%) increase in cardiovascular, and a 1.10% (95% CI: 0.59, 1.62%) increase in respiratory mortality per 10μg/m3 increase in PM2.5. Accounting for the downward bias induced by studies of single days, the all-cause mortality estimate increased to 1.01% (95% CI: 0.81, 1.20%). We found significant associations between mortality and several PM2.5 constituents. The most consistent and stronger associations were observed for elemental carbon (EC) and potassium (K). For most of the constituents, we observed high variability of effect estimates across cities. CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis suggests that (a) combustion elements such as EC and K have a stronger association with mortality, (b) single lag studies underestimate effects, and (c) estimates of PM2.5 and constituents differ across regions. Accounting for PM mass in constituent's health models may lead to more stable and comparable effect estimates across different studies. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO: CRD42017055765.
Authors: Howard Balshem; Mark Helfand; Holger J Schünemann; Andrew D Oxman; Regina Kunz; Jan Brozek; Gunn E Vist; Yngve Falck-Ytter; Joerg Meerpohl; Susan Norris; Gordon H Guyatt Journal: J Clin Epidemiol Date: 2011-01-05 Impact factor: 6.437
Authors: Therese F Mar; Kazuhiko Ito; Jane Q Koenig; Timothy V Larson; Delbert J Eatough; Ronald C Henry; Eugene Kim; Francine Laden; Ramona Lall; Lucas Neas; Matthias Stölzel; Pentti Paatero; Philip K Hopke; George D Thurston Journal: J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol Date: 2005-11-16 Impact factor: 5.563
Authors: Antonella Zanobetti; Marie S O'Neill; Carina J Gronlund; Joel D Schwartz Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2012-04-09 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Orly Stampfer; Omar Torres Cassio; Jason A Grajales; Jessica L Black; Elena Austin; Edmund Seto; Catherine J Karr Journal: Prog Community Health Partnersh Date: 2022
Authors: Sandra Cortés; Cinthya Leiva; María José Ojeda; Natalia Bustamante-Ara; Wanjiku Wambaa; Alan Dominguez; Carlos Pasten Salvo; Camila Rodriguez Peralta; Bárbara Rojas Arenas; Diego Vargas Mesa; Ericka Ahumada-Padilla Journal: Environ Health Insights Date: 2022-06-27
Authors: Chen Chen; Dandan Xu; Mike Z He; Yanwen Wang; Zonghao Du; Yanjun Du; Yan Qian; Dongsheng Ji; Tiantian Li Journal: Environ Sci Technol Date: 2018-09-12 Impact factor: 9.028
Authors: Magdalena Fandiño-Del-Rio; Josiah L Kephart; Kendra N Williams; Gary Malpartida; Dana Boyd Barr; Kyle Steenland; Kirsten Koehler; William Checkley Journal: Indoor Air Date: 2021-03-22 Impact factor: 6.554
Authors: Xerxes Seposo; Audrey Lynn A Arcilla; Jose Guillermo N De Guzman; Enrico Miguel S Dizon; Andrea Nova R Figuracion; Christina Micaela M Morales; Pauleena Katriona A Tugonon; Geminn Louis C Apostol Journal: Chronic Dis Transl Med Date: 2021-02-23