Literature DB >> 2898791

Drug discrimination studies with MDMA and amphetamine.

R Oberlender1, D E Nichols.   

Abstract

The term entactogen has recently been introduced to describe a new pharmacological class of compounds best represented by 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine, MDMA, and its alpha-ethyl homologue MBDB. The present study was designed to test the similarities of the discriminative stimulus properties produced by MDMA and MBDB, as well as to elaborate further the distinction between entactogens, hallucinogens and stimulants. Two groups of rats were trained to discriminate saline from either racemic MDMA hydrochloride (1.75 mg/kg) or S-(+)-amphetamine sulfate (1.0 mg/kg) in a two-lever drug discrimination task. The (+/-)-MDMA cue completely generalized to S-(+)-MDMA, S-(+)-amphetamine, (+/-)-MDA, S-(+)-MBDB, (+/-)-MBDB, R-(-)-MDMA, and R-(-)-MBDB, but not to LSD or DOM. The S-(+)-amphetamine cue generalized to (+/-)-methamphetamine, but not to racemic MDMA or MBDB, nor to their optical isomers. The S-(+)-isomers of both MDMA and MBDB were more potent than the R-(-)-isomers. The results indicate that MDMA and MBDB may share a component of their discriminative stimulus properties which is different from both stimulants and hallucinogens. Although MDA and MDMA have been shown to be amphetamine-like, the lack of stimulant effects for MBDB suggests that amphetamine-like stimulant activity is not necessary for a compound to share discriminative stimulus properties with MDMA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 2898791     DOI: 10.1007/bf00212770

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)        ISSN: 0033-3158            Impact factor:   4.530


  35 in total

Review 1.  Discriminative stimulus properties of amphetamine and structurally related phenalkylamines.

Authors:  R Young; R A Glennon
Journal:  Med Res Rev       Date:  1986 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 12.944

Review 2.  Differences between the mechanism of action of MDMA, MBDB, and the classic hallucinogens. Identification of a new therapeutic class: entactogens.

Authors:  D E Nichols
Journal:  J Psychoactive Drugs       Date:  1986 Oct-Dec

3.  Derivatives of 1-(1,3-benzodioxol-5-yl)-2-butanamine: representatives of a novel therapeutic class.

Authors:  D E Nichols; A J Hoffman; R A Oberlender; P Jacob; A T Shulgin
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 7.446

4.  MDA: a psychoactive agent with dual stimulus effects.

Authors:  R A Glennon; R Young
Journal:  Life Sci       Date:  1984-01-23       Impact factor: 5.037

5.  Further investigation of the discriminative stimulus properties of MDA.

Authors:  R A Glennon; R Young
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 3.533

6.  Stereochemical effects of 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) and related amphetamine derivatives on inhibition of uptake of [3H]monoamines into synaptosomes from different regions of rat brain.

Authors:  T D Steele; D E Nichols; G K Yim
Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  1987-07-15       Impact factor: 5.858

7.  Hallucinogenic amphetamine selectively destroys brain serotonin nerve terminals.

Authors:  G Ricaurte; G Bryan; L Strauss; L Seiden; C Schuster
Journal:  Science       Date:  1985-09-06       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Discriminative profile of MDMA.

Authors:  M D Schechter
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 3.533

9.  The effects of 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) and 3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine (MDA) on monoaminergic systems in the rat brain.

Authors:  D M Stone; D C Stahl; G R Hanson; J W Gibb
Journal:  Eur J Pharmacol       Date:  1986-08-22       Impact factor: 4.432

10.  MDA and DOM: substituted amphetamines that do not produce amphetamine-like discriminative stimuli in the rat.

Authors:  H E Shannon
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 4.530

View more
  27 in total

1.  Reinstatement of extinguished amphetamine self-administration by 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) and its enantiomers in rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  Jessica McClung; William Fantegrossi; Leonard L Howell
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2010-03-23       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 2.  Dark Classics in Chemical Neuroscience: 3,4-Methylenedioxymethamphetamine.

Authors:  Lee E Dunlap; Anne M Andrews; David E Olson
Journal:  ACS Chem Neurosci       Date:  2018-07-12       Impact factor: 4.418

3.  MDMA produces stimulant-like conditioned locomotor activity.

Authors:  L H Gold; G F Koob
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  A role for the mesolimbic dopamine system in the psychostimulant actions of MDMA.

Authors:  L H Gold; C B Hubner; G F Koob
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  Reinforcement schedule effects in rats trained to discriminate 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) or cocaine.

Authors:  Daniel Kueh; Lisa E Baker
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2006-09-23       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  The effects of fluoxetine on the subjective and physiological effects of 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) in humans.

Authors:  Manuel Tancer; Chris-Ellyn Johanson
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2006-10-18       Impact factor: 4.530

7.  Discriminative stimulus and locomotor effects of para-substituted and benzofuran analogs of amphetamine.

Authors:  Sean B Dolan; Michael J Forster; Michael B Gatch
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 4.492

8.  Amphetamine derivatives induce locomotor hyperactivity by acting as indirect serotonin agonists.

Authors:  C W Callaway; M P Johnson; L H Gold; D E Nichols; M A Geyer
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 4.530

9.  Comparison of the discriminative stimulus effects of dimethyltryptamine with different classes of psychoactive compounds in rats.

Authors:  Michael B Gatch; Margaret A Rutledge; Theresa Carbonaro; Michael J Forster
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2009-03-14       Impact factor: 4.530

10.  Discriminative stimulus effects of 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine and its enantiomers in mice: pharmacokinetic considerations.

Authors:  William E Fantegrossi; Naoki Murai; Brian O Mathúna; Nieves Pizarro; Rafael de la Torre
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2009-03-10       Impact factor: 4.030

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.