Mohammad Suliman1, Mohammad Al Qadire2, Manar Alazzam3, Sami Aloush4, Arwa Alsaraireh5, Faris A Alsaraireh6. 1. Department of Community and Mental Health Nursing, Princess Salma Faculty of Nursing, Al-alBayt University, Mafraq, Jordan. Electronic address: Mbarahemah@aabu.edu.jo. 2. Department of Adult Health Nursing, Princess Salma Faculty of Nursing, Al-alBayt University, Mafraq, Jordan. Electronic address: mohammadqadire@aabu.edu.jo. 3. Department of Community and Mental Health Nursing, Princess Salma Faculty of Nursing, Al-alBayt University, Mafraq, Jordan. Electronic address: alazzam@aabu.edu.jo. 4. Department of Community and Mental Health Nursing, Princess Salma Faculty of Nursing, Al-alBayt University, Mafraq, Jordan. 5. Department of Maternity and Child Health Nursing, School of Nursing, Mutah University, AL-Karak, Jordan. 6. Community and Mental Health Nursing, School of Nursing, Mutah University, AL-Karak, Jordan. Electronic address: Fares_gf@mutah.edu.jo.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Student nurses are at high risk of blood-borne pathogens transmitted via Needle Stick Injury (NSI). Understanding various aspects of NSI is essential if they are to avoid the risks associated with it. OBJECTIVES: The study was conducted to measure student nurses' level of knowledge about NSI and to examine its prevalence and post-exposure measures in Jordan. DESIGN: A cross-sectional and descriptive design was used. SAMPLE AND SETTING: A sample of 279 student nurses studying at one private and four government universities distributed throughout Jordan. METHOD: The study used an online survey composed of 22 questions developed from NSI literature. The questionnaire was divided into three parts: background, to measure students' demographics; knowledge, to measure nurses' understanding of NSI; and prevalence, to measure exposure to NSI and the follow-up measures. Student nurses were recruited through Facebook. The survey was available online for one full semester in 2016/2017. RESULTS: The total number of completed surveys was 279 (response rate=61%). Most of the students were female (n=198; 71%), in their fourth year (n=114; 40.9%). Their mean age was 21years (SD=2.5). The mean score for the knowledge part was 7 out of 10 (SD=1.7). Almost a third of the students had at least one incident of exposure to NSI (n=73; 26.2%). Most of the students who had suffered NSI did not inform their clinical instructors (67.1%) or write an incident report (86.3%). The results showed that there was no significant difference in the knowledge total scores between males and females or between students across different universities. However, a significant difference was found between students in different years of study (F (276, 2)=6.77, p=0.001). CONCLUSION: Student nurses in Jordan have a moderate understanding of issues regarding NSI. This knowledge improved with seniority. However, exposure to NSI and its under-reporting is a prevalent problem. This study recommends focusing on NSI in the nursing curriculum, and providing more protection and post-exposure intervention for students during their clinical practice.
BACKGROUND: Student nurses are at high risk of blood-borne pathogens transmitted via Needle Stick Injury (NSI). Understanding various aspects of NSI is essential if they are to avoid the risks associated with it. OBJECTIVES: The study was conducted to measure student nurses' level of knowledge about NSI and to examine its prevalence and post-exposure measures in Jordan. DESIGN: A cross-sectional and descriptive design was used. SAMPLE AND SETTING: A sample of 279 student nurses studying at one private and four government universities distributed throughout Jordan. METHOD: The study used an online survey composed of 22 questions developed from NSI literature. The questionnaire was divided into three parts: background, to measure students' demographics; knowledge, to measure nurses' understanding of NSI; and prevalence, to measure exposure to NSI and the follow-up measures. Student nurses were recruited through Facebook. The survey was available online for one full semester in 2016/2017. RESULTS: The total number of completed surveys was 279 (response rate=61%). Most of the students were female (n=198; 71%), in their fourth year (n=114; 40.9%). Their mean age was 21years (SD=2.5). The mean score for the knowledge part was 7 out of 10 (SD=1.7). Almost a third of the students had at least one incident of exposure to NSI (n=73; 26.2%). Most of the students who had suffered NSI did not inform their clinical instructors (67.1%) or write an incident report (86.3%). The results showed that there was no significant difference in the knowledge total scores between males and females or between students across different universities. However, a significant difference was found between students in different years of study (F (276, 2)=6.77, p=0.001). CONCLUSION: Student nurses in Jordan have a moderate understanding of issues regarding NSI. This knowledge improved with seniority. However, exposure to NSI and its under-reporting is a prevalent problem. This study recommends focusing on NSI in the nursing curriculum, and providing more protection and post-exposure intervention for students during their clinical practice.