PURPOSE: To evaluate the MRI features of paraduodenal pancreatitis (PDP) and to define useful signs to differentiate PDP from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). MATERIAL AND METHODS: We reviewed the MRI scans of 56 patients, 28 affected by PDP and 28 by PDAC, all pathologically proven. The following parameters were evaluated: signal intensity of the lesion on T1-, T2-WI, DWI (b800) and after contrast medium administration; presence of cysts; dilation of common hepatic duct and main pancreatic duct; focal thickening of the second portion of the duodenum; maximum diameter and volume of the lesion. RESULTS: Both PDPs and PDACs were more frequently hypointense on T1-WI, iso-hyperintense on T2-WI, hypointense in the pancreatic phase and iso-hypointense in the venous phase (p>0.05); in the delayed phase most PDP were hyperintense (p=0.0031); on DWI 71.4% PDPs were isointense and all PDACs were hyperintense (p=0.0041). Cystic components were present in 85.7% PDPs (p=0.0011); double duct sign was present in 50% PDACs (p=0.0048); focal thickening of the duodenum was depicted in 89.3 PDPs (p=0.0012). PDPs were larger than PDACs (p=0.0003). CONCLUSION: The most suggestive signs of PDP are: signal hyperintensity in the delayed phase, isointensity on DWI, presence of cysts, focal thickening of the duodenum and large size of the lesion.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the MRI features of paraduodenal pancreatitis (PDP) and to define useful signs to differentiate PDP from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). MATERIAL AND METHODS: We reviewed the MRI scans of 56 patients, 28 affected by PDP and 28 by PDAC, all pathologically proven. The following parameters were evaluated: signal intensity of the lesion on T1-, T2-WI, DWI (b800) and after contrast medium administration; presence of cysts; dilation of common hepatic duct and main pancreatic duct; focal thickening of the second portion of the duodenum; maximum diameter and volume of the lesion. RESULTS: Both PDPs and PDACs were more frequently hypointense on T1-WI, iso-hyperintense on T2-WI, hypointense in the pancreatic phase and iso-hypointense in the venous phase (p>0.05); in the delayed phase most PDP were hyperintense (p=0.0031); on DWI 71.4% PDPs were isointense and all PDACs were hyperintense (p=0.0041). Cystic components were present in 85.7% PDPs (p=0.0011); double duct sign was present in 50% PDACs (p=0.0048); focal thickening of the duodenum was depicted in 89.3 PDPs (p=0.0012). PDPs were larger than PDACs (p=0.0003). CONCLUSION: The most suggestive signs of PDP are: signal hyperintensity in the delayed phase, isointensity on DWI, presence of cysts, focal thickening of the duodenum and large size of the lesion.