Literature DB >> 28987563

Prospective validation of a preoperative risk score model based on pancreatic texture to predict postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Riccardo Casadei1, Claudio Ricci2, Giovanni Taffurelli2, Carlo Alberto Pacilio2, Mariacristina Di Marco3, Nico Pagano2, Carla Serra2, Lucia Calculli3, Donatella Santini3, Francesco Minni2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In 2015, basing on objective preoperative factors related to pancreas remnant texture (body mass index, Wirsung duct size and preoperative diagnosis), we proposed a score model to predict the risk of postoperative pancreatic fistula after partial pancreatectomies. The aim of the present study was to prospectively validate this preoperative predictive risk score for postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy.
METHODS: Prospective study of consecutive patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy in which a preoperative risk score, based on factors related to the pancreatic texture, was calculated. The risk score model was tested by comparison with subjective intraoperative assessment of the pancreas remnant texture and drain amylase value on postoperative day 1. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratio and area under the curve were calculated.
RESULTS: Eighty-four patients who underwent pancreaticoduodnectomy were analyzed. Clinically relevant pancreatic fistulas rate was 40.6%. The risk score model with a cut-off of 6 increased the odds of pancreatic fistula approximately 3 fold but it was not independently related to it. On the contrary, considering a cut-off of 5, the risk score model increased the odds of pancreatic fistula 11-16 fold and it was independently related to it. The new risk score model and pancreatic texture had high sensitivity (97% and 88%, respectively) and low specificity (34% and 60%, respectively) while the amylase drain value had low sensitivity (44%) and high specificity (92%).
CONCLUSIONS: The preoperative risk score model with a cut-off of 5 was a useful predictor of clinically relevant pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy. The drain amylase value represents a complementary factor to the risk score in predicting a pancreatic fistula.
Copyright © 2017 IJS Publishing Group Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Pancreas texture; Pancreaticoduodenectomy; Postoperative pancreatic fistula

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28987563     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.09.070

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Surg        ISSN: 1743-9159            Impact factor:   6.071


  9 in total

1.  Application of a novel embeddedness-like pancreaticojejunostomy anastomosis technique used in pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Xuefeng Xu; Yang Lv; Lei Zhang; Baobao Xin; Jian-Ang Li; Dansong Wang; Tiantao Kuang; Wenhui Lou; Dayong Jin
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 2.967

2.  The Yonsei experience of 104 laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomies: a propensity score-matched analysis with open pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Sang Hyup Han; Chang Moo Kang; Ho Kyoung Hwang; Dong Sup Yoon; Woo Jung Lee
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-07-08       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Preoperative risk evaluation for pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Ryan J Ellis; D Brock Hewitt; Jason B Liu; Mark E Cohen; Ryan P Merkow; David J Bentrem; Karl Y Bilimoria; Anthony D Yang
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-04-05       Impact factor: 3.454

4.  Surgical outcomes are hampered after endoscopic ultrasonography-guided ethanol lavage and/or Taxol injection in cystic lesions of the pancreas.

Authors:  Seong-Ryong Kim; Song Cheol Kim; Ki Byung Song; Kwang-Min Park; Dae Wook Hwang; Jae Hoon Lee; Sang Hyun Shin; Bong Jun Kwak; Young-Joo Lee
Journal:  Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg       Date:  2021-08-31

Review 5.  Predictive value of drain pancreatic amylase concentration for postoperative pancreatic fistula on postoperative day 1 after pancreatic resection: An updated meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yao Liu; Yang Li; Ling Wang; Ci-Jun Peng
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.817

6.  Validation of original and alternative fistula risk scores in postoperative pancreatic fistula.

Authors:  Youngju Ryu; Sang Hyun Shin; Dae Joon Park; Naru Kim; Jin Seok Heo; Dong Wook Choi; In Woong Han
Journal:  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 7.027

7.  Blumgart Anastomosis After Pancreaticoduodenectomy. A Comprehensive Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Meta-Regression.

Authors:  Claudio Ricci; Carlo Ingaldi; Laura Alberici; Nico Pagano; Cristina Mosconi; Giovanni Marasco; Francesco Minni; Riccardo Casadei
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a retrospective study of 200 cases and the optimization of the single-center learning curve.

Authors:  Yi-Chen Tang; Qin-Qin Liu; Yong-Gang He; Jing Li; Xiao-Bing Huang
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2021-07       Impact factor: 1.241

9.  Perioperative risk of pancreatic head resection-nomogram-based prediction of severe postoperative complications as a decisional aid for clinical practice.

Authors:  J Hipp; L Rist; S Chikhladze; D A Ruess; S Fichtner-Feigl; U A Wittel
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 2.895

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.