Literature DB >> 28987400

Minimum Distance of Suture Anchors Used for Rotator Cuff Repair Without Decreasing the Pullout Strength: A Biomechanical Study.

Jun Kawakami1, Nobuyuki Yamamoto1, Hideaki Nagamoto2, Eiji Itoi3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the minimum distance between the anchors without decreasing the pullout strength using the polyurethane foams and the porcine bones.
METHODS: Metal screw-type anchors and PEEK (polyether ether ketone) coil-type anchors were used. Two same-type suture anchors were placed into the polyurethane foams and porcine bones. The polyurethane foams were 3 different densities simulating severe osteoporosis, osteoporosis, and normal bone. The distances between the centers of anchors were set at 4, 6, 8, and 10 mm. The pair of anchors were loaded to failure if they had not been pulled out after cyclic loading from 50 to 200 N, 10 cycles per each 50-N increment. Mode of failure, ultimate load to failure, displacement of the anchor, and number of cycles completed were recorded.
RESULTS: In all polyurethane foams of 3 different densities with use of metal screw-type anchors, the 4-mm group demonstrated a significantly lower ultimate load to failure compared with the 6-, 8-, and 10-mm groups (P < .01). There were no significant differences in the load to failure among the 6-, 8-, and 10-mm groups. Porcine bone or PEEK coil-type anchor showed results similar to those of the metal screw-type anchors.
CONCLUSION: For the 2 tested anchors, the minimum distance between the anchors without decreasing the pullout strength was 6 mm (center to center) regardless of bone density in a biomechanical study. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Although it has been thought that the minimum distance between the anchors without decreasing the pullout strength was 1 cm (center to center), our data showed that it was 6 mm.
Copyright © 2017 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28987400     DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2017.07.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  5 in total

1.  Comparison of two arthroscopic repair techniques for small-medium supraspinatus tendon tear: 1 triple-loaded vs 2 double-loaded metallic sutures anchors.

Authors:  Massimiliano Piatti; Massimo Gorla; Marco Turati; Robert J Omeljaniuk; Diego Gaddi; Marco Bigoni
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2022-07-09

2.  Enhancing percutaneous pedicle screw fixation with hydroxyapatite granules: A biomechanical study using an osteoporotic bone model.

Authors:  Haruo Kanno; Toshimi Aizawa; Ko Hashimoto; Eiji Itoi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Can magnetic resonance imaging accurately and reliably measure humeral cortical thickness?

Authors:  Peter N Chalmers; Garrett V Christensen; Hiroaki Ishikawa; Heath B Henninger; Eugene G Kholmovski; Megan Mills; Robert Z Tashjian
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2021-12-11

4.  3D-Printed Double-Helical Biodegradable Iron Suture Anchor: A Rabbit Rotator Cuff Tear Model.

Authors:  Wen-Chih Liu; Chih-Hau Chang; Chung-Hwan Chen; Chun-Kuan Lu; Chun-Hsien Ma; Shin-I Huang; Wei-Lun Fan; Hsin-Hsin Shen; Pei-I Tsai; Kuo-Yi Yang; Yin-Chih Fu
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 3.748

5.  Mobility Assessment of the Supraspinatus in a Porcine Cadaver Model Using a Sensor-Enhanced, Arthroscopic Grasper.

Authors:  Felix Porschke; Christoph Luecke; Thorsten Guehring; Christel Weiss; Stefan Studier-Fischer; Paul Alfred Gruetzner; Marc Schnetzke
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2020-08-13       Impact factor: 3.934

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.