Literature DB >> 28987332

Disparities in cancer screening by occupational characteristics.

Stacey A Fedewa1, Ann Goding Sauer2, Carol DeSantis2, Rebecca L Siegel2, Ahmedin Jemal2.   

Abstract

Cancer screening patterns according to occupation characteristics in the United States are not well known, but could be used to help inform cancer control efforts. We examined cervical (CC), breast (BC) and colorectal cancer (CRC) screening prevalence and prevalence ratios (PR) by occupational characteristics in 2010, 2013 and 2015 National Health Interview Surveys (NHIS) among eligible US workers (CC women 21-65years; n=20,997), (BC women ≥40years; n=14,258) and (CRC men and women ≥50years; n=17,333). Cervical, breast and colorectal cancer screening prevalence among US workers was 84.0%, 68.9%, and 56.8%, respectively. Unadjusted prevalence ratios for cervical (PR=0.92, 95%CI 0.90, 0.94), breast (PR=0.86, 95%CI 0.83, 0.90) and colorectal cancer screening (PR=0.83, 95%CI 0.80, 0.87) were lower among workers in small (<25 employees) compared to large organizations (≥500 employees). People in food service, construction, production, and sales occupations were 13-26%, 17-28% and 9-30% less likely to be up to date with cervical, breast, and colorectal cancer screening, respectively, compared to healthcare professionals. Adjustment for socioeconomic factors and insurance status eliminated most associations. Disparities in cancer screening by occupational characteristics were mostly attributed to lower socioeconomic status and lack of insurance. These findings underscore the need for innovative public health strategies to improve cancer screening in vulnerable populations.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; Cancer prevention; Cancer screening; Cervical cancer; Colorectal cancer; Race/ethnicity

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28987332     DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.10.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Med        ISSN: 0091-7435            Impact factor:   4.018


  10 in total

1.  Evaluating and Improving Cancer Screening Process Quality in a Multilevel Context: The PROSPR II Consortium Design and Research Agenda.

Authors:  Elisabeth F Beaber; Aruna Kamineni; Andrea N Burnett-Hartman; Brian Hixon; Sarah C Kobrin; Christopher I Li; Malia Oliver; Katharine A Rendle; Celette Sugg Skinner; Kaitlin Todd; Yingye Zheng; Rebecca A Ziebell; Erica S Breslau; Jessica Chubak; Douglas A Corley; Robert T Greenlee; Jennifer S Haas; Ethan A Halm; Stacey Honda; Christine Neslund-Dudas; Debra P Ritzwoller; Joanne E Schottinger; Jasmin A Tiro; Anil Vachani; V Paul Doria-Rose
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2022-08-02       Impact factor: 4.090

2.  Long-Term Colorectal Cancer Incidence and Mortality After Colonoscopy Screening According to Individuals' Risk Profiles.

Authors:  Kai Wang; Wenjie Ma; Kana Wu; Shuji Ogino; Edward L Giovannucci; Andrew T Chan; Mingyang Song
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2021-09-04       Impact factor: 11.816

3.  Social inequalities in cervical cancer screening: a discrete choice experiment among French general practitioners and gynaecologists.

Authors:  Thibaut Raginel; Guillaume Grandazzi; Guy Launoy; Mélanie Trocmé; Véronique Christophe; Célia Berchi; Lydia Guittet
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-07-27       Impact factor: 2.655

4.  Healthy lifestyle, endoscopic screening, and colorectal cancer incidence and mortality in the United States: A nationwide cohort study.

Authors:  Kai Wang; Wenjie Ma; Kana Wu; Shuji Ogino; Andrew T Chan; Edward L Giovannucci; Mingyang Song
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 11.069

5.  Unemployment and cancer screening: Baseline estimates to inform health care delivery in the context of COVID-19 economic distress.

Authors:  Stacey A Fedewa; K Robin Yabroff; Priti Bandi; Robert A Smith; Nigar Nargis; Zhiyuan Zheng; Jeffrey Drope; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2021-11-08       Impact factor: 6.921

6.  Cancer disparities related to poverty and rurality for 22 top cancers in Florida.

Authors:  Jaclyn M Hall; Sarah M Szurek; Heedeok Cho; Yi Guo; Michael S Gutter; Georges E Khalil; Jonathan D Licht; Elizabeth A Shenkman
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2022-07-22

Review 7.  Role of Occupation in Shaping Cancer Disparities.

Authors:  Giulia Collatuzzo; Federica Teglia; Paolo Boffetta
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-31       Impact factor: 6.575

8.  Abnormal Pap Follow-Up among Criminal-Legal Involved Women in Three U.S. Cities.

Authors:  Chelsea Salyer; Ashlyn Lipnicky; Meredith Bagwell-Gray; Jennifer Lorvick; Karen Cropsey; Megha Ramaswamy
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Socioeconomic status and colorectal cancer screening behaviors in a vulnerable multiethnic population.

Authors:  Eduardo J Santiago-Rodríguez; Natalie A Rivadeneira; Jacqueline M Torres; Urmimala Sarkar; Robert A Hiatt
Journal:  Ethn Health       Date:  2020-10-29       Impact factor: 2.732

10.  State Variation in Low-Dose Computed Tomography Scanning for Lung Cancer Screening in the United States.

Authors:  Stacey A Fedewa; Ella A Kazerooni; Jamie L Studts; Robert A Smith; Priti Bandi; Ann Goding Sauer; Megan Cotter; Helmneh M Sineshaw; Ahmedin Jemal; Gerard A Silvestri
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2021-08-02       Impact factor: 13.506

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.