| Literature DB >> 28986997 |
Yumi Araki1,2, Akiko Suganami3, Suzu Endo1, Yuta Masuda1, Keijo Fukushima1, John W Regan4, Toshihiko Murayama2, Yutaka Tamura3, Hiromichi Fujino1.
Abstract
The 2-series of prostaglandin E (PGE2 ) is regarded as a pro-cancer prostanoid, whereas the 1-series (PGE1 ) and the 3-series (PGE3 ) are considered to act as anti-cancer prostanoids. In the present study, we provide possible reasons why PGE1 and PGE3 , but not PGE2 , exert anti-cancer effects by focusing on each diverged E-type prostanoid (EP)4 receptor-mediated signaling pathway. PGE1 , PGE2 and PGE3 function as full agonists in terms of Gαs - and Gαi -protein-mediated signaling. However, PGE1 and PGE3 function as partial agonists of T-cell factor (TCF)/β-catenin (β-cat)-mediated activity, the well-known cancer-related signaling pathway. Furthermore, pretreatment with PGE1 or PGE3 almost completely reduces PGE2 -induced TCF/β-cat activity. These results provide a plausible reason why PGE1 and PGE3 function as anti-cancer prostanoids as a result of novel biased activity for EP4 receptors.Entities:
Keywords: zzm321990PGEzzm3219901zzm321990; zzm321990PGEzzm3219902zzm321990; zzm321990PGEzzm3219903zzm321990; E-type prostanoid 4 receptors; TCF/β-catenin signaling; biased ligands
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28986997 DOI: 10.1002/1873-3468.12878
Source DB: PubMed Journal: FEBS Lett ISSN: 0014-5793 Impact factor: 4.124